Curriculum-enhanced GroupDRO: Challenging the Norm of Avoiding Curriculum Learning in Subpopulation Shift Setups

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15272v1
• Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:38:56 GMT
• Title: Curriculum-enhanced GroupDRO: Challenging the Norm of Avoiding Curriculum Learning in Subpopulation Shift Setups
• Authors: Antonio Barbalau,
• Abstract summary: In subpopulation shift scenarios, a Curriculum Learning (CL) approach would only serve to imprint the model weights, early on, with the easily learnable spurious correlations. We propose a Curriculum-enhanced Group Distributionally Robust Optimization (CeGDRO) approach, which prioritizes the hardest bias-confirming samples and the easiest bias-conflicting samples.
• Score: 2.719510212909501
• License:
• Abstract: In subpopulation shift scenarios, a Curriculum Learning (CL) approach would only serve to imprint the model weights, early on, with the easily learnable spurious correlations featured. To the best of our knowledge, none of the current state-of-the-art subpopulation shift approaches employ any kind of curriculum. To overcome this, we design a CL approach aimed at initializing the model weights in an unbiased vantage point in the hypothesis space which sabotages easy convergence towards biased hypotheses during the final optimization based on the entirety of the available data. We hereby propose a Curriculum-enhanced Group Distributionally Robust Optimization (CeGDRO) approach, which prioritizes the hardest bias-confirming samples and the easiest bias-conflicting samples, leveraging GroupDRO to balance the initial discrepancy in terms of difficulty. We benchmark our proposed method against the most popular subpopulation shift datasets, showing an increase over the state-of-the-art results across all scenarios, up to 6.2% on Waterbirds.

Related papers

• Mind the GAP: Improving Robustness to Subpopulation Shifts with Group-Aware Priors [46.03963664373476]
  We develop a family of group-aware prior (GAP) distributions over neural network parameters that explicitly favor models that generalize well under subpopulation shifts. We demonstrate that training withGAP yields state-of-the-art performance -- even when only retraining the final layer of a previously trained non-robust model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T21:00:26Z)
• Take the Bull by the Horns: Hard Sample-Reweighted Continual Training Improves LLM Generalization [165.98557106089777]
  A key challenge is to enhance the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) amid a looming shortage of high-quality training data. Our study starts from an empirical strategy for the light continual training of LLMs using their original pre-training data sets. We then formalize this strategy into a principled framework of Instance-Reweighted Distributionally Robust Optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T04:10:57Z)
• Group Robust Classification Without Any Group Information [5.053622900542495]
  This study contends that current bias-unsupervised approaches to group robustness continue to rely on group information to achieve optimal performance. bias labels are still crucial for effective model selection, restricting the practicality of these methods in real-world scenarios. We propose a revised methodology for training and validating debiased models in an entirely bias-unsupervised manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T01:29:18Z)
• Improving Generalization of Alignment with Human Preferences through Group Invariant Learning [56.19242260613749]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) enables the generation of responses more aligned with human preferences. Previous work shows that Reinforcement Learning (RL) often exploits shortcuts to attain high rewards and overlooks challenging samples. We propose a novel approach that can learn a consistent policy via RL across various data groups or domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T13:54:15Z)
• Bias Amplification Enhances Minority Group Performance [10.380812738348899]
  We propose BAM, a novel two-stage training algorithm. In the first stage, the model is trained using a bias amplification scheme via introducing a learnable auxiliary variable for each training sample. In the second stage, we upweight the samples that the bias-amplified model misclassifies, and then continue training the same model on the reweighted dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T04:40:08Z)
• Consistency Regularization for Generalizable Source-free Domain Adaptation [62.654883736925456]
  Source-free domain adaptation (SFDA) aims to adapt a well-trained source model to an unlabelled target domain without accessing the source dataset. Existing SFDA methods ONLY assess their adapted models on the target training set, neglecting the data from unseen but identically distributed testing sets. We propose a consistency regularization framework to develop a more generalizable SFDA method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T07:45:53Z)
• Modeling the Q-Diversity in a Min-max Play Game for Robust Optimization [61.39201891894024]
  Group distributionally robust optimization (group DRO) can minimize the worst-case loss over pre-defined groups. We reformulate the group DRO framework by proposing Q-Diversity. Characterized by an interactive training mode, Q-Diversity relaxes the group identification from annotation into direct parameterization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-20T07:02:27Z)
• Ranking & Reweighting Improves Group Distributional Robustness [14.021069321266516]
  We propose a ranking-based training method called Discounted Rank Upweighting (DRU) to learn models that exhibit strong OOD performance on the test data. Results on several synthetic and real-world datasets highlight the superior ability of our group-ranking-based (akin to soft-minimax) approach in selecting and learning models that are robust to group distributional shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T20:37:16Z)
• Proposal Distribution Calibration for Few-Shot Object Detection [65.19808035019031]
  In few-shot object detection (FSOD), the two-step training paradigm is widely adopted to mitigate the severe sample imbalance. Unfortunately, the extreme data scarcity aggravates the proposal distribution bias, hindering the RoI head from evolving toward novel classes. We introduce a simple yet effective proposal distribution calibration (PDC) approach to neatly enhance the localization and classification abilities of the RoI head.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T05:09:11Z)
• Distributionally Robust Models with Parametric Likelihood Ratios [123.05074253513935]
  Three simple ideas allow us to train models with DRO using a broader class of parametric likelihood ratios. We find that models trained with the resulting parametric adversaries are consistently more robust to subpopulation shifts when compared to other DRO approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-13T12:43:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.