Group Robust Classification Without Any Group Information

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.18555v1
• Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 01:29:18 GMT
• Title: Group Robust Classification Without Any Group Information
• Authors: Christos Tsirigotis, Joao Monteiro, Pau Rodriguez, David Vazquez, Aaron Courville
• Abstract summary: This study contends that current bias-unsupervised approaches to group robustness continue to rely on group information to achieve optimal performance. bias labels are still crucial for effective model selection, restricting the practicality of these methods in real-world scenarios. We propose a revised methodology for training and validating debiased models in an entirely bias-unsupervised manner.
• Score: 5.053622900542495
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Empirical risk minimization (ERM) is sensitive to spurious correlations in the training data, which poses a significant risk when deploying systems trained under this paradigm in high-stake applications. While the existing literature focuses on maximizing group-balanced or worst-group accuracy, estimating these accuracies is hindered by costly bias annotations. This study contends that current bias-unsupervised approaches to group robustness continue to rely on group information to achieve optimal performance. Firstly, these methods implicitly assume that all group combinations are represented during training. To illustrate this, we introduce a systematic generalization task on the MPI3D dataset and discover that current algorithms fail to improve the ERM baseline when combinations of observed attribute values are missing. Secondly, bias labels are still crucial for effective model selection, restricting the practicality of these methods in real-world scenarios. To address these limitations, we propose a revised methodology for training and validating debiased models in an entirely bias-unsupervised manner. We achieve this by employing pretrained self-supervised models to reliably extract bias information, which enables the integration of a logit adjustment training loss with our validation criterion. Our empirical analysis on synthetic and real-world tasks provides evidence that our approach overcomes the identified challenges and consistently enhances robust accuracy, attaining performance which is competitive with or outperforms that of state-of-the-art methods, which, conversely, rely on bias labels for validation.

Related papers

• Efficient Bias Mitigation Without Privileged Information [14.21628601482357]
  Deep neural networks trained via empirical risk minimisation often exhibit significant performance disparities across groups. Existing bias mitigation methods that aim to address this issue often rely on group labels for training or validation. We propose Targeted Augmentations for Bias Mitigation (TAB), a framework that leverages the entire training history of a helper model to identify spurious samples. We show that TAB improves worst-group performance without any group information or model selection, outperforming existing methods while maintaining overall accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T09:56:13Z)
• Binary Classification with Confidence Difference [100.08818204756093]
  This paper delves into a novel weakly supervised binary classification problem called confidence-difference (ConfDiff) classification. We propose a risk-consistent approach to tackle this problem and show that the estimation error bound the optimal convergence rate. We also introduce a risk correction approach to mitigate overfitting problems, whose consistency and convergence rate are also proven.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T11:44:50Z)
• Bias Amplification Enhances Minority Group Performance [10.380812738348899]
  We propose BAM, a novel two-stage training algorithm. In the first stage, the model is trained using a bias amplification scheme via introducing a learnable auxiliary variable for each training sample. In the second stage, we upweight the samples that the bias-amplified model misclassifies, and then continue training the same model on the reweighted dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T04:40:08Z)
• Consistency Regularization for Generalizable Source-free Domain Adaptation [62.654883736925456]
  Source-free domain adaptation (SFDA) aims to adapt a well-trained source model to an unlabelled target domain without accessing the source dataset. Existing SFDA methods ONLY assess their adapted models on the target training set, neglecting the data from unseen but identically distributed testing sets. We propose a consistency regularization framework to develop a more generalizable SFDA method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T07:45:53Z)
• Delving into Identify-Emphasize Paradigm for Combating Unknown Bias [52.76758938921129]
  We propose an effective bias-conflicting scoring method (ECS) to boost the identification accuracy. We also propose gradient alignment (GA) to balance the contributions of the mined bias-aligned and bias-conflicting samples. Experiments are conducted on multiple datasets in various settings, demonstrating that the proposed solution can mitigate the impact of unknown biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T14:50:24Z)
• Pushing the Accuracy-Group Robustness Frontier with Introspective Self-play [16.262574174989698]
  Introspective Self-play (ISP) is a simple approach to improve the uncertainty estimation of a deep neural network under dataset bias. We show that ISP provably improves the bias-awareness of the model representation and the resulting uncertainty estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T22:59:08Z)
• Take One Gram of Neural Features, Get Enhanced Group Robustness [23.541213868620837]
  Predictive performance of machine learning models trained with empirical risk minimization can degrade considerably under distribution shifts. We propose to partition the training dataset into groups based on Gram matrices of features extracted by an identification'' model. Our approach not only improves group robustness over ERM but also outperforms all recent baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-26T12:34:55Z)
• Distraction is All You Need for Fairness [0.0]
  We propose a strategy for training deep learning models called the Distraction module. This method can be theoretically proven effective in controlling bias from affecting the classification results. We demonstrate the potency of the proposed method by testing it on UCI Adult and Heritage Health datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T01:46:55Z)
• Measuring Fairness Under Unawareness of Sensitive Attributes: A Quantification-Based Approach [131.20444904674494]
  We tackle the problem of measuring group fairness under unawareness of sensitive attributes. We show that quantification approaches are particularly suited to tackle the fairness-under-unawareness problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-17T13:45:46Z)
• Unsupervised Learning of Debiased Representations with Pseudo-Attributes [85.5691102676175]
  We propose a simple but effective debiasing technique in an unsupervised manner. We perform clustering on the feature embedding space and identify pseudoattributes by taking advantage of the clustering results. We then employ a novel cluster-based reweighting scheme for learning debiased representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-06T05:20:46Z)
• Causal Feature Selection for Algorithmic Fairness [61.767399505764736]
  We consider fairness in the integration component of data management. We propose an approach to identify a sub-collection of features that ensure the fairness of the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T20:20:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.