SAGEval: The frontiers of Satisfactory Agent based NLG Evaluation for reference-free open-ended text

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.16077v1
• Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 04:07:16 GMT
• Title: SAGEval: The frontiers of Satisfactory Agent based NLG Evaluation for reference-free open-ended text
• Authors: Reshmi Ghosh, Tianyi Yao, Lizzy Chen, Sadid Hasan, Tianwei Chen, Dario Bernal, Huitian Jiao, H M Sajjad Hossain,
• Abstract summary: This paper identifies the need to develop robust evaluation approaches for natural language generation, wherein references/ground labels doesn't exist or isn't amply available. We show that the critiquing Agent is able to rectify scores from LLM evaluators, thereby reducing the need for labeled data even for complex NLG evaluation scenarios.
• Score: 0.848663031844483
• License:
• Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) integrations into applications like Microsoft365 suite and Google Workspace for creating/processing documents, emails, presentations, etc. has led to considerable enhancements in productivity and time savings. But as these integrations become more more complex, it is paramount to ensure that the quality of output from the LLM-integrated applications are relevant and appropriate for use. Identifying the need to develop robust evaluation approaches for natural language generation, wherein references/ground labels doesn't exist or isn't amply available, this paper introduces a novel framework called "SAGEval" which utilizes a critiquing Agent to provide feedback on scores generated by LLM evaluators. We show that the critiquing Agent is able to rectify scores from LLM evaluators, in absence of references/ground-truth labels, thereby reducing the need for labeled data even for complex NLG evaluation scenarios, like the generation of JSON-structured forms/surveys with responses in different styles like multiple choice, likert ratings, single choice questions, etc.

Related papers

• LatteReview: A Multi-Agent Framework for Systematic Review Automation Using Large Language Models [0.0]
  LatteReview is a Python-based framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) and multi-agent systems to automate key elements of the systematic review process. The framework supports features such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for incorporating external context, multimodal reviews, Pydantic-based validation for structured inputs and outputs, and asynchronous programming for handling large-scale datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-05T17:53:00Z)
• Socio-Emotional Response Generation: A Human Evaluation Protocol for LLM-Based Conversational Systems [9.101091541480434]
  We propose a neural architecture that includes an intermediate step in planning socio-emotional strategies before response generation. Our study shows that predicting a sequence of expected strategy labels and using this sequence to generate a response yields better results than a direct end-to-end generation scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T08:15:36Z)
• DocETL: Agentic Query Rewriting and Evaluation for Complex Document Processing [10.712756715779822]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in analyzing unstructured data. LLMs outputs for user-defined operations are often inaccurate, even with optimized prompts. We present DocETL, a system that optimize complex document processing pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T03:22:35Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [69.4501863547618]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios. With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance. Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• DCA-Bench: A Benchmark for Dataset Curation Agents [9.60250892491588]
  We propose a dataset curation agent benchmark, DCA-Bench, to measure large language models' capability of detecting hidden dataset quality issues. Specifically, we collect diverse real-world dataset quality issues from eight open dataset platforms as a testbed. The proposed benchmark can also serve as a testbed for measuring the capability of LLMs in problem discovery rather than just problem-solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T14:02:23Z)
• RepEval: Effective Text Evaluation with LLM Representation [55.26340302485898]
  RepEval is a metric that leverages the projection of Large Language Models (LLMs) representations for evaluation. Our work underscores the richness of information regarding text quality embedded within LLM representations, offering insights for the development of new metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T13:50:55Z)
• Exploring Precision and Recall to assess the quality and diversity of LLMs [82.21278402856079]
  We introduce a novel evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) such as textscLlama-2 and textscMistral. This approach allows for a nuanced assessment of the quality and diversity of generated text without the need for aligned corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T13:53:26Z)
• ML-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models and Agents for Machine Learning Tasks on Repository-Level Code [76.84199699772903]
  ML-Bench is a benchmark rooted in real-world programming applications that leverage existing code repositories to perform tasks. To evaluate both Large Language Models (LLMs) and AI agents, two setups are employed: ML-LLM-Bench for assessing LLMs' text-to-code conversion within a predefined deployment environment, and ML-Agent-Bench for testing autonomous agents in an end-to-end task execution within a Linux sandbox environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T12:03:21Z)
• Not All Metrics Are Guilty: Improving NLG Evaluation by Diversifying References [123.39034752499076]
  Div-Ref is a method to enhance evaluation benchmarks by enriching the number of references. We conduct experiments to empirically demonstrate that diversifying the expression of reference can significantly enhance the correlation between automatic evaluation and human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T11:53:29Z)
• Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedback [127.75419038610455]
  Large language models (LLMs) are able to generate human-like, fluent responses for many downstream tasks. This paper proposes a LLM-Augmenter system, which augments a black-box LLM with a set of plug-and-play modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T18:48:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.