Evaluating and Improving the Robustness of Security Attack Detectors Generated by LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18216v1
• Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 10:48:37 GMT
• Title: Evaluating and Improving the Robustness of Security Attack Detectors Generated by LLMs
• Authors: Samuele Pasini, Jinhan Kim, Tommaso Aiello, Rocio Cabrera Lozoya, Antonino Sabetta, Paolo Tonella,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in software development to generate functions, such as attack detectors, that implement security requirements.<n>This is most likely due to the LLM lacking knowledge about some existing attacks and to the generated code being not evaluated in real usage scenarios.<n>We propose a novel approach integrating Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and Self-Ranking into the LLM pipeline.
• Score: 6.936401700600395
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in software development to generate functions, such as attack detectors, that implement security requirements. However, LLMs struggle to generate accurate code, resulting, e.g., in attack detectors that miss well-known attacks when used in practice. This is most likely due to the LLM lacking knowledge about some existing attacks and to the generated code being not evaluated in real usage scenarios. We propose a novel approach integrating Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and Self-Ranking into the LLM pipeline. RAG enhances the robustness of the output by incorporating external knowledge sources, while the Self-Ranking technique, inspired to the concept of Self-Consistency, generates multiple reasoning paths and creates ranks to select the most robust detector. Our extensive empirical study targets code generated by LLMs to detect two prevalent injection attacks in web security: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and SQL injection (SQLi). Results show a significant improvement in detection performance compared to baselines, with an increase of up to 71%pt and 37%pt in the F2-Score for XSS and SQLi detection, respectively.

Related papers

• Can LLMs Classify CVEs? Investigating LLMs Capabilities in Computing CVSS Vectors [15.43868945929965]
  We evaluate the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in generating CVSS scores for newly reported vulnerabilities. Our results show that while LLMs demonstrate potential in automating CVSS evaluation, embedding-based methods outperform them in scoring more subjective components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T21:10:57Z)
• Benchmarking LLMs and LLM-based Agents in Practical Vulnerability Detection for Code Repositories [8.583591493627276]
  We introduce JitVul, a vulnerability detection benchmark linking each function to its vulnerability-introducing and fixing commits. We show that ReAct Agents, leveraging thought-action-observation and interprocedural context, perform better than LLMs in distinguishing vulnerable from benign code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T15:22:24Z)
• Towards Copyright Protection for Knowledge Bases of Retrieval-augmented Language Models via Ownership Verification with Reasoning [58.57194301645823]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into real-world applications through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) mechanisms. Existing methods that can be generalized as watermarking techniques to protect these knowledge bases typically involve poisoning attacks. We propose name for harmless' copyright protection of knowledge bases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T09:15:56Z)
• Fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs): Improved Prompt Injection Attacks Detection [6.269725911814401]
  Large language models (LLMs) are becoming a popular tool as they have significantly advanced in their capability to tackle a wide range of language-based tasks. However, LLMs applications are highly vulnerable to prompt injection attacks, which poses a critical problem. This project explores the security vulnerabilities in relation to prompt injection attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T00:36:21Z)
• Aligning LLMs to Be Robust Against Prompt Injection [55.07562650579068]
  We show that alignment can be a powerful tool to make LLMs more robust against prompt injection attacks. Our method -- SecAlign -- first builds an alignment dataset by simulating prompt injection attacks. Our experiments show that SecAlign robustifies the LLM substantially with a negligible hurt on model utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T19:34:35Z)
• Efficiency Unleashed: Inference Acceleration for LLM-based Recommender Systems with Speculative Decoding [61.45448947483328]
  We introduce Lossless Acceleration via Speculative Decoding for LLM-based Recommender Systems (LASER) LASER features a Customized Retrieval Pool to enhance retrieval efficiency and Relaxed Verification to improve the acceptance rate of draft tokens. LASER achieves a 3-5x speedup on public datasets and saves about 67% of computational resources during the online A/B test.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-11T02:31:13Z)
• Rag and Roll: An End-to-End Evaluation of Indirect Prompt Manipulations in LLM-based Application Frameworks [12.061098193438022]
  Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is a technique commonly used to equip models with out of distribution knowledge. This paper investigates the security of RAG systems against end-to-end indirect prompt manipulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T12:26:05Z)
• Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs [60.32717556756674]
  This paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess Large Language Models in detecting cryptographic misuses. Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives. The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T15:31:26Z)
• AutoDetect: Towards a Unified Framework for Automated Weakness Detection in Large Language Models [95.09157454599605]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly powerful, but they still exhibit significant but subtle weaknesses. Traditional benchmarking approaches cannot thoroughly pinpoint specific model deficiencies. We introduce a unified framework, AutoDetect, to automatically expose weaknesses in LLMs across various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T15:16:45Z)
• Security Vulnerability Detection with Multitask Self-Instructed Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models [8.167614500821223]
  We introduce MSIVD, multitask self-instructed fine-tuning for vulnerability detection, inspired by chain-of-thought prompting and LLM self-instruction. Our experiments demonstrate that MSIVD achieves superior performance, outperforming the highest LLM-based vulnerability detector baseline (LineVul) with a F1 score of 0.92 on the BigVul dataset, and 0.48 on the PreciseBugs dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T19:18:05Z)
• Phantom: General Trigger Attacks on Retrieval Augmented Language Generation [30.63258739968483]
  Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) expands the capabilities of modern large language models (LLMs) We propose new attack vectors that allow an adversary to inject a single malicious document into a RAG system's knowledge base, and mount a backdoor poisoning attack. We demonstrate our attacks on multiple LLM architectures, including Gemma, Vicuna, and Llama, and show that they transfer to GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T21:19:24Z)
• Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models [79.0183835295533]
  We introduce the first benchmark for indirect prompt injection attacks, named BIPIA, to assess the risk of such vulnerabilities. Our analysis identifies two key factors contributing to their success: LLMs' inability to distinguish between informational context and actionable instructions, and their lack of awareness in avoiding the execution of instructions within external content. We propose two novel defense mechanisms-boundary awareness and explicit reminder-to address these vulnerabilities in both black-box and white-box settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T01:08:39Z)
• Understanding the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Detecting Security Vulnerabilities [12.82645410161464]
  We evaluate the effectiveness of 16 pre-trained Large Language Models on 5,000 code samples from five diverse security datasets. Overall, LLMs show modest effectiveness in detecting vulnerabilities, obtaining an average accuracy of 62.8% and F1 score of 0.71 across datasets. We find that advanced prompting strategies that involve step-by-step analysis significantly improve performance of LLMs on real-world datasets in terms of F1 score (by upto 0.18 on average)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T13:17:20Z)
• Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMs [59.596335292426105]
  This paper collects the first open-source dataset to evaluate safeguards in large language models. We train several BERT-like classifiers to achieve results comparable with GPT-4 on automatic safety evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T14:02:12Z)
• Red Teaming Language Model Detectors with Language Models [114.36392560711022]
  Large language models (LLMs) present significant safety and ethical risks if exploited by malicious users. Recent works have proposed algorithms to detect LLM-generated text and protect LLMs. We study two types of attack strategies: 1) replacing certain words in an LLM's output with their synonyms given the context; 2) automatically searching for an instructional prompt to alter the writing style of the generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T10:08:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.