Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16576v1
• Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 15:31:26 GMT
• Title: Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs
• Authors: Yifan Xia, Zichen Xie, Peiyu Liu, Kangjie Lu, Yan Liu, Wenhai Wang, Shouling Ji,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess Large Language Models in detecting cryptographic misuses. Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives. The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks.
• Score: 60.32717556756674
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: While the automated detection of cryptographic API misuses has progressed significantly, its precision diminishes for intricate targets due to the reliance on manually defined patterns. Large Language Models (LLMs), renowned for their contextual understanding, offer a promising avenue to address existing shortcomings. However, applying LLMs in this security-critical domain presents challenges, particularly due to the unreliability stemming from LLMs' stochastic nature and the well-known issue of hallucination. To explore the prevalence of LLMs' unreliable analysis and potential solutions, this paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess LLMs in detecting cryptographic misuses, utilizing a comprehensive dataset encompassing both manually-crafted samples and real-world projects. Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives. Nevertheless, we demonstrate how a constrained problem scope, coupled with LLMs' self-correction capability, significantly enhances the reliability of the detection. The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks. Moreover, we identify the failure patterns that persistently hinder LLMs' reliability, including both cryptographic knowledge deficiency and code semantics misinterpretation. Guided by these insights, we develop an LLM-based workflow to examine open-source repositories, leading to the discovery of 63 real-world cryptographic misuses. Of these, 46 have been acknowledged by the development community, with 23 currently being addressed and 6 resolved. Reflecting on developers' feedback, we offer recommendations for future research and the development of LLM-based security tools.

Related papers

• Beyond Binary: Towards Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detection via Role Recognition and Involvement Measurement [51.601916604301685]
  Large language models (LLMs) generate content that can undermine trust in online discourse. Current methods often focus on binary classification, failing to address the complexities of real-world scenarios like human-AI collaboration. To move beyond binary classification and address these challenges, we propose a new paradigm for detecting LLM-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T08:14:10Z)
• PertEval: Unveiling Real Knowledge Capacity of LLMs with Knowledge-Invariant Perturbations [22.011216436252845]
  We present PertEval, a toolkit for probing large language models' knowledge capacity. PertEval employs human-like restatement techniques to generate on-the-fly test samples from static benchmarks. Our findings provide insights for advancing more robust and genuinely knowledgeable LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T06:38:32Z)
• Unveiling the Misuse Potential of Base Large Language Models via In-Context Learning [61.2224355547598]
  Open-sourcing of large language models (LLMs) accelerates application development, innovation, and scientific progress. Our investigation exposes a critical oversight in this belief. By deploying carefully designed demonstrations, our research demonstrates that base LLMs could effectively interpret and execute malicious instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T13:22:54Z)
• A Comprehensive Study of the Capabilities of Large Language Models for Vulnerability Detection [9.422811525274675]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated great potential for code generation and other software engineering tasks. Vulnerability detection is of crucial importance to maintaining the security, integrity, and trustworthiness of software systems. Recent work has applied LLMs to vulnerability detection using generic prompting techniques, but their capabilities for this task and the types of errors they make remain unclear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T21:47:36Z)
• LLMs Cannot Reliably Identify and Reason About Security Vulnerabilities (Yet?): A Comprehensive Evaluation, Framework, and Benchmarks [17.522223535347905]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been suggested for use in automated vulnerability repair, but benchmarks showing they can consistently identify security-related bugs are lacking. We develop SecLLMHolmes, a fully automated evaluation framework that performs the most detailed investigation to date on whether LLMs can reliably identify and reason about security-related bugs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T20:19:43Z)
• Understanding the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Detecting Security Vulnerabilities [12.82645410161464]
  We evaluate the effectiveness of 16 pre-trained Large Language Models on 5,000 code samples from five diverse security datasets. Overall, LLMs show modest effectiveness in detecting vulnerabilities, obtaining an average accuracy of 62.8% and F1 score of 0.71 across datasets. We find that advanced prompting strategies that involve step-by-step analysis significantly improve performance of LLMs on real-world datasets in terms of F1 score (by upto 0.18 on average)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T13:17:20Z)
• ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks [91.55895047448249]
  This paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases. We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets. Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:37:32Z)
• TRACE: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Continual Learning in Large Language Models [52.734140807634624]
  Aligned large language models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional capabilities in task-solving, following instructions, and ensuring safety. Existing continual learning benchmarks lack sufficient challenge for leading aligned LLMs. We introduce TRACE, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate continual learning in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T16:38:49Z)
• Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMs [59.596335292426105]
  This paper collects the first open-source dataset to evaluate safeguards in large language models. We train several BERT-like classifiers to achieve results comparable with GPT-4 on automatic safety evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T14:02:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.