A Comparative Analysis of Vulnerability Management Tools: Evaluating Nessus, Acunetix, and Nikto for Risk Based Security Solutions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19123v1
• Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 13:14:24 GMT
• Title: A Comparative Analysis of Vulnerability Management Tools: Evaluating Nessus, Acunetix, and Nikto for Risk Based Security Solutions
• Authors: Swetha B, Susmitha NRK, Thirulogaveni J, Sruthi S,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a comparative analysis of three widely used vulnerability management tools: Nessus, Acunetix, and Nikto. Each tool is assessed based on its detection accuracy, risk scoring using the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS), ease of use, automation and reporting capabilities, performance metrics, and cost effectiveness.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: The evolving threat landscape in cybersecurity necessitates the adoption of advanced tools for effective vulnerability management. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of three widely used tools: Nessus, Acunetix, and Nikto. Each tool is assessed based on its detection accuracy, risk scoring using the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS), ease of use, automation and reporting capabilities, performance metrics, and cost effectiveness. The research addresses the challenges faced by organizations in selecting the most suitable tool for their unique security requirements.

Related papers

• Bringing Order Amidst Chaos: On the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Secure Software Engineering [0.0]
  The ever-evolving technological landscape offers both opportunities and threats, creating a dynamic space where chaos and order compete. Secure software engineering (SSE) must continuously address vulnerabilities that endanger software systems. This thesis seeks to bring order to the chaos in SSE by addressing domain-specific differences that impact AI accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T11:38:58Z)
• ChatNVD: Advancing Cybersecurity Vulnerability Assessment with Large Language Models [0.46873264197900916]
  This paper explores the potential application of Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance the assessment of software vulnerabilities. We develop three variants of ChatNVD, utilizing three prominent LLMs: GPT-4o mini by OpenAI, Llama 3 by Meta, and Gemini 1.5 Pro by Google. To evaluate their efficacy, we conduct a comparative analysis of these models using a comprehensive questionnaire comprising common security vulnerability questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T03:45:49Z)
• A Comprehensive Study on Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Tools for Android [22.558610938860124]
  VulsTotal is a unified evaluation platform for defining and describing tools' supported vulnerability types. We select 11 free and open-sourced SAST tools from a pool of 97 existing options, adhering to clearly defined criteria. We then unify 67 general/common vulnerability types for Android SAST tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T05:10:22Z)
• The Impact of SBOM Generators on Vulnerability Assessment in Python: A Comparison and a Novel Approach [56.4040698609393]
  Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) has been promoted as a tool to increase transparency and verifiability in software composition. Current SBOM generation tools often suffer from inaccuracies in identifying components and dependencies. We propose PIP-sbom, a novel pip-inspired solution that addresses their shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T10:12:37Z)
• EARBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [53.717918131568936]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction. Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results. However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges. This study introduces EARBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• SecScore: Enhancing the CVSS Threat Metric Group with Empirical Evidences [0.0]
  One of the most widely used vulnerability scoring systems (CVSS) does not address the increasing likelihood of emerging an exploit code. We present SecScore, an innovative vulnerability severity score that enhances CVSS Threat metric group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T12:25:55Z)
• An Extensive Comparison of Static Application Security Testing Tools [1.3927943269211593]
  Static Application Security Testing Tools (SASTTs) identify software vulnerabilities to support the security and reliability of software applications. Several studies have suggested that alternative solutions may be more effective than SASTTs due to their tendency to generate false alarms. Our SASTTs evaluation is based on a controlled, though synthetic, Java.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T09:37:54Z)
• ASSERT: Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models [65.79770974145983]
  ASSERT, Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming, consists of three methods -- semantically aligned augmentation, target bootstrapping, and adversarial knowledge injection. We partition our prompts into four safety domains for a fine-grained analysis of how the domain affects model performance. We find statistically significant performance differences of up to 11% in absolute classification accuracy among semantically related scenarios and error rates of up to 19% absolute error in zero-shot adversarial settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T17:10:28Z)
• Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox [68.26587052548287]
  Language Model (LM) agents and tools enable a rich set of capabilities but also amplify potential risks. High cost of testing these agents will make it increasingly difficult to find high-stakes, long-tailed risks. We introduce ToolEmu: a framework that uses an LM to emulate tool execution and enables the testing of LM agents against a diverse range of tools and scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T17:08:02Z)
• Leveraging Traceability to Integrate Safety Analysis Artifacts into the Software Development Process [51.42800587382228]
  Safety assurance cases (SACs) can be challenging to maintain during system evolution. We propose a solution that leverages software traceability to connect relevant system artifacts to safety analysis models. We elicit design rationales for system changes to help safety stakeholders analyze the impact of system changes on safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T16:03:27Z)
• Differential privacy and robust statistics in high dimensions [49.50869296871643]
  High-dimensional Propose-Test-Release (HPTR) builds upon three crucial components: the exponential mechanism, robust statistics, and the Propose-Test-Release mechanism. We show that HPTR nearly achieves the optimal sample complexity under several scenarios studied in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-12T06:36:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.