Bringing Order Amidst Chaos: On the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Secure Software Engineering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05165v1
• Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 11:38:58 GMT
• Title: Bringing Order Amidst Chaos: On the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Secure Software Engineering
• Authors: Matteo Esposito,
• Abstract summary: The ever-evolving technological landscape offers both opportunities and threats, creating a dynamic space where chaos and order compete. Secure software engineering (SSE) must continuously address vulnerabilities that endanger software systems. This thesis seeks to bring order to the chaos in SSE by addressing domain-specific differences that impact AI accuracy.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Context. Developing secure and reliable software remains a key challenge in software engineering (SE). The ever-evolving technological landscape offers both opportunities and threats, creating a dynamic space where chaos and order compete. Secure software engineering (SSE) must continuously address vulnerabilities that endanger software systems and carry broader socio-economic risks, such as compromising critical national infrastructure and causing significant financial losses. Researchers and practitioners have explored methodologies like Static Application Security Testing Tools (SASTTs) and artificial intelligence (AI) approaches, including machine learning (ML) and large language models (LLMs), to detect and mitigate these vulnerabilities. Each method has unique strengths and limitations. Aim. This thesis seeks to bring order to the chaos in SSE by addressing domain-specific differences that impact AI accuracy. Methodology. The research employs a mix of empirical strategies, such as evaluating effort-aware metrics, analyzing SASTTs, conducting method-level analysis, and leveraging evidence-based techniques like systematic dataset reviews. These approaches help characterize vulnerability prediction datasets. Results. Key findings include limitations in static analysis tools for identifying vulnerabilities, gaps in SASTT coverage of vulnerability types, weak relationships among vulnerability severity scores, improved defect prediction accuracy using just-in-time modeling, and threats posed by untouched methods. Conclusions. This thesis highlights the complexity of SSE and the importance of contextual knowledge in improving AI-driven vulnerability and defect prediction. The comprehensive analysis advances effective prediction models, benefiting both researchers and practitioners.

Related papers

• Computational Safety for Generative AI: A Signal Processing Perspective [65.268245109828]
  computational safety is a mathematical framework that enables the quantitative assessment, formulation, and study of safety challenges in GenAI. We show how sensitivity analysis and loss landscape analysis can be used to detect malicious prompts with jailbreak attempts. We discuss key open research challenges, opportunities, and the essential role of signal processing in computational AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T02:26:50Z)
• LLMs in Software Security: A Survey of Vulnerability Detection Techniques and Insights [12.424610893030353]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are emerging as transformative tools for software vulnerability detection. This paper provides a detailed survey of LLMs in vulnerability detection. We address challenges such as cross-language vulnerability detection, multimodal data integration, and repository-level analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T21:33:38Z)
• Beyond the Surface: An NLP-based Methodology to Automatically Estimate CVE Relevance for CAPEC Attack Patterns [42.63501759921809]
  We propose a methodology leveraging Natural Language Processing (NLP) to associate Common Vulnerabilities and Exposure (CAPEC) vulnerabilities with Common Attack Patternion and Classification (CAPEC) attack patterns. Experimental evaluations demonstrate superior performance compared to state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-13T08:39:52Z)
• CTINEXUS: Leveraging Optimized LLM In-Context Learning for Constructing Cybersecurity Knowledge Graphs Under Data Scarcity [49.657358248788945]
  Textual descriptions in cyber threat intelligence (CTI) reports are rich sources of knowledge about cyber threats. Current CTI extraction methods lack flexibility and generalizability, often resulting in inaccurate and incomplete knowledge extraction. We propose CTINexus, a novel framework leveraging optimized in-context learning (ICL) of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T14:18:32Z)
• EARBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [53.717918131568936]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction. Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results. However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges. This study introduces EARBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• A Survey on Failure Analysis and Fault Injection in AI Systems [28.30817443151044]
  The complexity of AI systems has exposed their vulnerabilities, necessitating robust methods for failure analysis (FA) and fault injection (FI) to ensure resilience and reliability. This study fills this gap by presenting a detailed survey of existing FA and FI approaches across six layers of AI systems. Our findings reveal a taxonomy of AI system failures, assess the capabilities of existing FI tools, and highlight discrepancies between real-world and simulated failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T00:32:03Z)
• Dynamic Vulnerability Criticality Calculator for Industrial Control Systems [0.0]
  This paper introduces an innovative approach by proposing a dynamic vulnerability criticality calculator. Our methodology encompasses the analysis of environmental topology and the effectiveness of deployed security mechanisms. Our approach integrates these factors into a comprehensive Fuzzy Cognitive Map model, incorporating attack paths to holistically assess the overall vulnerability score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T09:48:47Z)
• Building Safe and Reliable AI systems for Safety Critical Tasks with Vision-Language Processing [1.2183405753834557]
  Current AI algorithms are unable to identify common causes for failure detection. Additional techniques are required to quantify the quality of predictions. This thesis will focus on vision-language data processing for tasks like classification, image captioning, and vision question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T18:05:59Z)
• Towards Automated Classification of Attackers' TTPs by combining NLP with ML Techniques [77.34726150561087]
  We evaluate and compare different Natural Language Processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques used for security information extraction in research. Based on our investigations we propose a data processing pipeline that automatically classifies unstructured text according to attackers' tactics and techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T09:59:21Z)
• Improving robustness of jet tagging algorithms with adversarial training [56.79800815519762]
  We investigate the vulnerability of flavor tagging algorithms via application of adversarial attacks. We present an adversarial training strategy that mitigates the impact of such simulated attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T19:57:19Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.