Fusing Physics-Driven Strategies and Cross-Modal Adversarial Learning: Toward Multi-Domain Applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.00341v1
• Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 03:47:17 GMT
• Title: Fusing Physics-Driven Strategies and Cross-Modal Adversarial Learning: Toward Multi-Domain Applications
• Authors: Hana Satou, Alan Mitkiy,
• Abstract summary: Cross-modal adversarial learning and physics-driven methods represent a cutting-edge direction for tackling challenges in scientific computing. This review focuses on analyzing how these two approaches can be synergistically integrated to enhance performance and robustness across diverse application domains.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: The convergence of cross-modal adversarial learning and physics-driven methods represents a cutting-edge direction for tackling challenges in complex multi-modal tasks and scientific computing. This review focuses on systematically analyzing how these two approaches can be synergistically integrated to enhance performance and robustness across diverse application domains. By addressing key obstacles such as modality discrepancies, limited data availability, and insufficient model robustness, this paper highlights the role of physics-based optimization frameworks in facilitating efficient and interpretable adversarial perturbation generation. The review also explores significant advancements in cross-modal adversarial learning, including applications in tasks such as image cross-modal retrieval (e.g., infrared and RGB matching), scientific computing (e.g., solving partial differential equations), and optimization under physical consistency constraints in vision systems. By examining theoretical foundations and experimental outcomes, this study demonstrates the potential of combining these approaches to handle complex scenarios and improve the security of multi-modal systems. Finally, we outline future directions, proposing a novel framework that unifies physical principles with adversarial optimization, providing a pathway for researchers to develop robust and adaptable cross-modal learning methods with both theoretical and practical significance.

Related papers

• On the Comparison between Multi-modal and Single-modal Contrastive Learning [50.74988548106031]
  We introduce a theoretical foundation for understanding the differences between multi-modal and single-modal contrastive learning. We identify the critical factor, which is the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), that impacts the generalizability in downstream tasks of both multi-modal and single-modal contrastive learning. Our analysis provides a unified framework that can characterize the optimization and generalization of both single-modal and multi-modal contrastive learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T06:21:17Z)
• Benchmarking Transferable Adversarial Attacks [6.898135768312255]
  The robustness of deep learning models against adversarial attacks remains a pivotal concern. This study systematically categorizes and critically evaluates various methodologies developed to augment the transferability of adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T08:36:16Z)
• SHARCS: Shared Concept Space for Explainable Multimodal Learning [3.899855581265356]
  We introduce SHARCS -- a novel concept-based approach for explainable multimodal learning. SHARCS learns and maps interpretable concepts from different heterogeneous modalities into a single unified concept-manifold. We show that SHARCS can operate and significantly outperform other approaches in practically significant scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-01T12:05:20Z)
• A Field Guide to Federated Optimization [161.3779046812383]
  Federated learning and analytics are a distributed approach for collaboratively learning models (or statistics) from decentralized data. This paper provides recommendations and guidelines on formulating, designing, evaluating and analyzing federated optimization algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-14T18:09:08Z)
• Hybrid analysis and modeling, eclecticism, and multifidelity computing toward digital twin revolution [0.0]
  We explore the challenges of (i) trustworthiness and generalizability in developing data-driven models, and (ii) seamless integration of interface learning and multifidelity coupling approaches. Addressing these challenges could enable the revolution of digital twin technologies for scientific and engineering applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T17:43:44Z)
• Congestion-aware Multi-agent Trajectory Prediction for Collision Avoidance [110.63037190641414]
  We propose to learn congestion patterns explicitly and devise a novel "Sense--Learn--Reason--Predict" framework. By decomposing the learning phases into two stages, a "student" can learn contextual cues from a "teacher" while generating collision-free trajectories. In experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed model is able to generate collision-free trajectory predictions in a synthetic dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T02:42:33Z)
• Investigating Bi-Level Optimization for Learning and Vision from a Unified Perspective: A Survey and Beyond [114.39616146985001]
  In machine learning and computer vision fields, despite the different motivations and mechanisms, a lot of complex problems contain a series of closely related subproblms. In this paper, we first uniformly express these complex learning and vision problems from the perspective of Bi-Level Optimization (BLO) Then we construct a value-function-based single-level reformulation and establish a unified algorithmic framework to understand and formulate mainstream gradient-based BLO methodologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-27T16:20:23Z)
• Behavior Priors for Efficient Reinforcement Learning [97.81587970962232]
  We consider how information and architectural constraints can be combined with ideas from the probabilistic modeling literature to learn behavior priors. We discuss how such latent variable formulations connect to related work on hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) and mutual information and curiosity based objectives. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework by applying it to a range of simulated continuous control domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T13:17:18Z)
• Importance Weighted Policy Learning and Adaptation [89.46467771037054]
  We study a complementary approach which is conceptually simple, general, modular and built on top of recent improvements in off-policy learning. The framework is inspired by ideas from the probabilistic inference literature and combines robust off-policy learning with a behavior prior. Our approach achieves competitive adaptation performance on hold-out tasks compared to meta reinforcement learning baselines and can scale to complex sparse-reward scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-10T14:16:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.