A Feedback Toolkit and Procedural Guidance for Teaching Thorough Testing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.00417v1
• Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 10:02:57 GMT
• Title: A Feedback Toolkit and Procedural Guidance for Teaching Thorough Testing
• Authors: Steffen Dick, Christoph Bockisch, Harrie Passier, Lex Bijlsma, Ruurd Kuiper,
• Abstract summary: Correctness is one of the more important criteria of qualitative software. Students do not receive sufficient feedback on code quality and tests unless specified in the assignment. We have developed a procedural guidance that guides students to an implementation with appropriate tests.
• Score: 0.7829352305480285
• License:
• Abstract: Correctness is one of the more important criteria of qualitative software. However, it is often taught in isolation and most students consider it only as an afterthought. They also do not receive sufficient feedback on code quality and tests unless specified in the assignment. To improve this, we developed a procedural guidance that guides students to an implementation with appropriate tests. Furthermore, we have developed a toolkit that students can use to independently get individual feedback on their solution and the adequateness of their tests. A key instrument is a test coverage analysis which allows for teachers to customize the feedback with constructive instructions specific to the current assignment to improve a student's test suite. In this paper, we outline the procedural guidance, explain the working of the feedback toolkit and present a method for using the toolkit in conjunction with the different steps of the procedural guidance.

Related papers

• A Block-Based Testing Framework for Scratch [9.390562437823078]
  We introduce a new category of blocks in Scratch that enables the creation of automated tests. With these blocks, students and teachers alike can create tests and receive feedback directly within the Scratch environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T14:11:26Z)
• Using Large Language Models for Student-Code Guided Test Case Generation in Computer Science Education [2.5382095320488665]
  Test cases are an integral part of programming assignments in computer science education. Test cases can be used as assessment items to test students' programming knowledge and provide personalized feedback on student-written code. We propose a large language model-based approach to automatically generate test cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-11T01:37:48Z)
• A large language model-assisted education tool to provide feedback on open-ended responses [2.624902795082451]
  We present a tool that uses large language models (LLMs), guided by instructor-defined criteria, to automate responses to open-ended questions. Our tool delivers rapid personalized feedback, enabling students to quickly test their knowledge and identify areas for improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T19:49:55Z)
• Automated Grading and Feedback Tools for Programming Education: A Systematic Review [7.776434991976473]
  Most papers assess the correctness of assignments in object-oriented languages. Few tools assess the maintainability, readability or documentation of the source code. Most tools offered fully automated assessment to allow for near-instantaneous feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T17:54:50Z)
• Active Teacher for Semi-Supervised Object Detection [80.10937030195228]
  We propose a novel algorithm called Active Teacher for semi-supervised object detection (SSOD) Active Teacher extends the teacher-student framework to an iterative version, where the label set is partially and gradually augmented by evaluating three key factors of unlabeled examples. With this design, Active Teacher can maximize the effect of limited label information while improving the quality of pseudo-labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T03:59:27Z)
• TEMPERA: Test-Time Prompting via Reinforcement Learning [57.48657629588436]
  We propose Test-time Prompt Editing using Reinforcement learning (TEMPERA) In contrast to prior prompt generation methods, TEMPERA can efficiently leverage prior knowledge. Our method achieves 5.33x on average improvement in sample efficiency when compared to the traditional fine-tuning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-21T22:38:20Z)
• Continuous Examination by Automatic Quiz Assessment Using Spiral Codes and Image Processing [69.35569554213679]
  Paper quizzes are affordable and within reach of campus education in classrooms. correction of the quiz is a considerable obstacle. We suggest mitigating the issue by a novel image processing technique.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T22:58:15Z)
• ProtoTransformer: A Meta-Learning Approach to Providing Student Feedback [54.142719510638614]
  In this paper, we frame the problem of providing feedback as few-shot classification. A meta-learner adapts to give feedback to student code on a new programming question from just a few examples by instructors. Our approach was successfully deployed to deliver feedback to 16,000 student exam-solutions in a programming course offered by a tier 1 university.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-23T22:41:28Z)
• Neural Multi-Task Learning for Teacher Question Detection in Online Classrooms [50.19997675066203]
  We build an end-to-end neural framework that automatically detects questions from teachers' audio recordings. By incorporating multi-task learning techniques, we are able to strengthen the understanding of semantic relations among different types of questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-16T02:17:04Z)
• Code Review in the Classroom [57.300604527924015]
  Young developers in a classroom setting provide a clear picture of the potential favourable and problematic areas of the code review process. Their feedback suggests that the process has been well received with some points to better the process. This paper can be used as guidelines to perform code reviews in the classroom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-19T06:07:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.