ArtBrain: An Explainable end-to-end Toolkit for Classification and Attribution of AI-Generated Art and Style

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.01512v1
• Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 14:03:50 GMT
• Title: ArtBrain: An Explainable end-to-end Toolkit for Classification and Attribution of AI-Generated Art and Style
• Authors: Ravidu Suien Rammuni Silva, Ahmad Lotfi, Isibor Kennedy Ihianle, Golnaz Shahtahmassebi, Jordan J. Bird,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces AI-ArtBench, a dataset featuring 185,015 artistic images across 10 art styles. It includes 125,015 AI-generated images and 60,000 pieces of human-created artwork. The accuracy of attribution to the generative model reaches 0.999.
• Score: 2.7321177315998915
• License:
• Abstract: Recently, the quality of artworks generated using Artificial Intelligence (AI) has increased significantly, resulting in growing difficulties in detecting synthetic artworks. However, limited studies have been conducted on identifying the authenticity of synthetic artworks and their source. This paper introduces AI-ArtBench, a dataset featuring 185,015 artistic images across 10 art styles. It includes 125,015 AI-generated images and 60,000 pieces of human-created artwork. This paper also outlines a method to accurately detect AI-generated images and trace them to their source model. This work proposes a novel Convolutional Neural Network model based on the ConvNeXt model called AttentionConvNeXt. AttentionConvNeXt was implemented and trained to differentiate between the source of the artwork and its style with an F1-Score of 0.869. The accuracy of attribution to the generative model reaches 0.999. To combine the scientific contributions arising from this study, a web-based application named ArtBrain was developed to enable both technical and non-technical users to interact with the model. Finally, this study presents the results of an Artistic Turing Test conducted with 50 participants. The findings reveal that humans could identify AI-generated images with an accuracy of approximately 58%, while the model itself achieved a significantly higher accuracy of around 99%.

Related papers

• Art Forgery Detection using Kolmogorov Arnold and Convolutional Neural Networks [0.0]
  We leverage the growing improvements in AI to present an art authentication framework. We focus on a specialized model of a forger, rather than an artist, flipping the approach of traditional AI methods. We compare the results with Kolmogorov Arnold Networks (KAN) which, to the best of our knowledge, have never been tested in the art domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T09:32:11Z)
• Quality Assessment for AI Generated Images with Instruction Tuning [58.41087653543607]
  We first establish a novel Image Quality Assessment (IQA) database for AIGIs, termed AIGCIQA2023+. This paper presents a MINT-IQA model to evaluate and explain human preferences for AIGIs from Multi-perspectives with INstruction Tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-12T17:45:11Z)
• The Adversarial AI-Art: Understanding, Generation, Detection, and Benchmarking [47.08666835021915]
  We present a systematic attempt at understanding and detecting AI-generated images (AI-art) in adversarial scenarios. The dataset, named ARIA, contains over 140K images in five categories: artworks (painting), social media images, news photos, disaster scenes, and anime pictures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T21:00:13Z)
• AIGCOIQA2024: Perceptual Quality Assessment of AI Generated Omnidirectional Images [70.42666704072964]
  We establish a large-scale AI generated omnidirectional image IQA database named AIGCOIQA2024. A subjective IQA experiment is conducted to assess human visual preferences from three perspectives. We conduct a benchmark experiment to evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art IQA models on our database.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T10:08:23Z)
• Organic or Diffused: Can We Distinguish Human Art from AI-generated Images? [24.417027069545117]
  Distinguishing AI generated images from human art is a challenging problem. A failure to address this problem allows bad actors to defraud individuals paying a premium for human art and companies whose stated policies forbid AI imagery. We curate real human art across 7 styles, generate matching images from 5 generative models, and apply 8 detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T17:25:04Z)
• AI Art Neural Constellation: Revealing the Collective and Contrastive State of AI-Generated and Human Art [36.21731898719347]
  We conduct a comprehensive analysis to position AI-generated art within the context of human art heritage. Our comparative analysis is based on an extensive dataset, dubbed ArtConstellation'' Key finding is that AI-generated artworks are visually related to the principle concepts for modern period art made in 1800-2000.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T11:49:51Z)
• Learning to Evaluate the Artness of AI-generated Images [64.48229009396186]
  ArtScore is a metric designed to evaluate the degree to which an image resembles authentic artworks by artists. We employ pre-trained models for photo and artwork generation, resulting in a series of mixed models. This dataset is then employed to train a neural network that learns to estimate quantized artness levels of arbitrary images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T17:58:27Z)
• Towards Artistic Image Aesthetics Assessment: a Large-scale Dataset and a New Method [64.40494830113286]
  We first introduce a large-scale AIAA dataset: Boldbrush Artistic Image dataset (BAID), which consists of 60,337 artistic images covering various art forms. We then propose a new method, SAAN, which can effectively extract and utilize style-specific and generic aesthetic information to evaluate artistic images. Experiments demonstrate that our proposed approach outperforms existing IAA methods on the proposed BAID dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T12:59:15Z)
• Is synthetic data from generative models ready for image recognition? [69.42645602062024]
  We study whether and how synthetic images generated from state-of-the-art text-to-image generation models can be used for image recognition tasks. We showcase the powerfulness and shortcomings of synthetic data from existing generative models, and propose strategies for better applying synthetic data for recognition tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T06:54:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.