Keeping Experts in the Loop: Expert-Guided Optimization for Clinical Data Classification using Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02173v1
• Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 05:05:13 GMT
• Title: Keeping Experts in the Loop: Expert-Guided Optimization for Clinical Data Classification using Large Language Models
• Authors: Nader Karayanni, Aya Awwad, Chein-Lien Hsiao, Surish P Shanmugam,
• Abstract summary: StructEase is a novel framework that bridges the gap between automation and the input of human expertise in prompt engineering.<n>A core innovation of the framework is SamplEase, an iterative sampling algorithm that identifies high-value cases where expert feedback drives significant performance improvements.
• Score: 0.5249805590164902
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Since the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs), the challenge of effectively leveraging their potential in healthcare has taken center stage. A critical barrier to using LLMs for extracting insights from unstructured clinical notes lies in the prompt engineering process. Despite its pivotal role in determining task performance, a clear framework for prompt optimization remains absent. Current methods to address this gap take either a manual prompt refinement approach, where domain experts collaborate with prompt engineers to create an optimal prompt, which is time-intensive and difficult to scale, or through employing automatic prompt optimizing approaches, where the value of the input of domain experts is not fully realized. To address this, we propose StructEase, a novel framework that bridges the gap between automation and the input of human expertise in prompt engineering. A core innovation of the framework is SamplEase, an iterative sampling algorithm that identifies high-value cases where expert feedback drives significant performance improvements. This approach minimizes expert intervention, to effectively enhance classification outcomes. This targeted approach reduces labeling redundancy, mitigates human error, and enhances classification outcomes. We evaluated the performance of StructEase using a dataset of de-identified clinical narratives from the US National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), demonstrating significant gains in classification performance compared to current methods. Our findings underscore the value of expert integration in LLM workflows, achieving notable improvements in F1 score while maintaining minimal expert effort. By combining transparency, flexibility, and scalability, StructEase sets the foundation for a framework to integrate expert input into LLM workflows in healthcare and beyond.

Related papers

• Supervised Optimism Correction: Be Confident When LLMs Are Sure [91.7459076316849]
  We establish a novel theoretical connection between supervised fine-tuning and offline reinforcement learning. We show that the widely used beam search method suffers from unacceptable over-optimism. We propose Supervised Optimism Correction, which introduces a simple yet effective auxiliary loss for token-level $Q$-value estimations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T07:50:03Z)
• A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization [103.59317151002693]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated unprecedented generative capabilities. Their alignment with human values remains critical for ensuring helpful and harmless deployments. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently gained prominence as a streamlined alternative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T08:45:15Z)
• Towards more Contextual Agents: An extractor-Generator Optimization Framework [0.0]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have demonstrated remarkable success in solving complex tasks across a wide range of general-purpose applications. However, their performance often degrades in context-specific scenarios, such as specialized industries or research domains. To address this challenge, our work introduces a systematic approach to enhance the contextual adaptability of LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:07:06Z)
• Self Iterative Label Refinement via Robust Unlabeled Learning [9.936885864460896]
  Self-refinement methods for large language models (LLMs) often suffer from inherent biases and overconfidence. We introduce an iterative refinement pipeline that employs the Unlabeled-Unlabeled learning framework to improve LLM-generated pseudo-labels for classification tasks. Our approach iteratively denoises and refines the initial pseudo-labels, thereby mitigating the adverse effects of internal biases with minimal human supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T06:04:18Z)
• Framework for Progressive Knowledge Fusion in Large Language Models Through Structured Conceptual Redundancy Analysis [0.0]
  The organization of latent knowledge within large-scale models poses unique challenges when addressing overlapping representations and optimizing contextual accuracy. A framework was proposed to restructure these redundancies through advanced clustering techniques and dynamic thresholding. Evaluations revealed improved memory efficiency and faster inference times, alongside better alignment in latent knowledge clusters that enhanced interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T11:34:04Z)
• Direct Preference Optimization Using Sparse Feature-Level Constraints [47.15096507230884]
  Feature-level constrained Preference Optimization is a novel method designed to simplify the alignment process while ensuring stability. Our approach enjoys efficiency by using sparse features activated in a well-trained sparse autoencoder and the quality of sequential KL divergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T07:54:13Z)
• Minstrel: Structural Prompt Generation with Multi-Agents Coordination for Non-AI Experts [22.500968440666398]
  LangGPT is a structural prompt design framework. Minstrel is a multi-generative agent system with reflection to automate the generation of structural prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-20T12:30:03Z)
• FactorLLM: Factorizing Knowledge via Mixture of Experts for Large Language Models [50.331708897857574]
  We introduce FactorLLM, a novel approach that decomposes well-trained dense FFNs into sparse sub-networks without requiring any further modifications. FactorLLM achieves comparable performance to the source model securing up to 85% model performance while obtaining over a 30% increase in inference speed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T16:45:16Z)
• FedEGG: Federated Learning with Explicit Global Guidance [90.04705121816185]
  Federated Learning (FL) holds great potential for diverse applications owing to its privacy-preserving nature. Existing methods help address these challenges via optimization-based client constraints, adaptive client selection, or the use of pre-trained models or synthetic data. We present bftextFedEGG, a new FL algorithm that constructs a global guiding task using a well-defined, easy-to-converge learning task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T04:25:21Z)
• Extending Token Computation for LLM Reasoning [5.801044612920816]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are pivotal in advancing natural language processing. LLMs often struggle with complex reasoning tasks due to inefficient attention distributions. We introduce a novel method for extending computed tokens in the Chain-of-Thought process, utilizing attention mechanism optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T03:23:58Z)
• LLM Inference Unveiled: Survey and Roofline Model Insights [62.92811060490876]
  Large Language Model (LLM) inference is rapidly evolving, presenting a unique blend of opportunities and challenges. Our survey stands out from traditional literature reviews by not only summarizing the current state of research but also by introducing a framework based on roofline model. This framework identifies the bottlenecks when deploying LLMs on hardware devices and provides a clear understanding of practical problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T07:33:05Z)
• PhaseEvo: Towards Unified In-Context Prompt Optimization for Large Language Models [9.362082187605356]
  We present PhaseEvo, an efficient automatic prompt optimization framework that combines the generative capability of LLMs with the global search proficiency of evolution algorithms. PhaseEvo significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline methods by a large margin whilst maintaining good efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T17:47:10Z)
• PromptAgent: Strategic Planning with Language Models Enables Expert-level Prompt Optimization [60.00631098364391]
  PromptAgent is an optimization method that crafts expert-level prompts equivalent in quality to those handcrafted by experts. Inspired by human-like trial-and-error exploration, PromptAgent induces precise expert-level insights and in-depth instructions. We apply PromptAgent to 12 tasks spanning three practical domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T07:47:01Z)
• Realistic Unsupervised CLIP Fine-tuning with Universal Entropy Optimization [101.08992036691673]
  This paper explores a realistic unsupervised fine-tuning scenario, considering the presence of out-of-distribution samples from unknown classes. In particular, we focus on simultaneously enhancing out-of-distribution detection and the recognition of instances associated with known classes. We present a simple, efficient, and effective approach called Universal Entropy Optimization (UEO)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-24T16:47:17Z)
• When Demonstrations Meet Generative World Models: A Maximum Likelihood Framework for Offline Inverse Reinforcement Learning [62.00672284480755]
  This paper aims to recover the structure of rewards and environment dynamics that underlie observed actions in a fixed, finite set of demonstrations from an expert agent. Accurate models of expertise in executing a task has applications in safety-sensitive applications such as clinical decision making and autonomous driving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T04:14:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.