Theory building for empirical software engineering in qualitative research: Operationalization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02384v1
• Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 11:15:27 GMT
• Title: Theory building for empirical software engineering in qualitative research: Operationalization
• Authors: Jorge Pérez, Jessica Díaz, Ángel González-Prieto, Sergio Gil-Borrás,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a set of procedures to systematize the operationalization phase in theory building. We operationalize the concepts and propositions that make up our theory to generate constructs and empirically testable hypotheses.
• Score: 4.268591926288843
• License:
• Abstract: Context: This work is part of a research project whose ultimate goal is to systematize theory building in qualitative research in the field of software engineering. The proposed methodology involves four phases: conceptualization, operationalization, testing, and application. In previous work, we performed the conceptualization of a theory that investigates the structure of IT departments and teams when software-intensive organizations adopt a culture called DevOps. Objective: This paper presents a set of procedures to systematize the operationalization phase in theory building and their application in the context of DevOps team structures. Method: We operationalize the concepts and propositions that make up our theory to generate constructs and empirically testable hypotheses. Instead of using causal relations to operationalize the propositions, we adopt logical implication, which avoids the problems associated with causal reasoning. Strategies are proposed to ensure that the resulting theory aligns with the criterion of parsimony. Results: The operationalization phase is described from three perspectives: specification, implementation, and practical application. First, the operationalization process is formally defined. Second, a set of procedures for operating both concepts and propositions is described. Finally, the usefulness of the proposed procedures is demonstrated in a case study. Conclusions: This paper is a pioneering contribution in offering comprehensive guidelines for theory operationalization using logical implication. By following established procedures and using concrete examples, researchers can better ensure the success of their theory-building efforts through careful operationalization.

Related papers

• Inference-Time Computations for LLM Reasoning and Planning: A Benchmark and Insights [49.42133807824413]
  We examine the reasoning and planning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in solving complex tasks. Recent advances in inference-time techniques demonstrate the potential to enhance LLM reasoning without additional training. OpenAI's o1 model shows promising performance through its novel use of multi-step reasoning and verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T04:11:29Z)
• LogiDynamics: Unraveling the Dynamics of Logical Inference in Large Language Model Reasoning [49.58786377307728]
  This paper adopts an exploratory approach by introducing a controlled evaluation environment for analogical reasoning. We analyze the comparative dynamics of inductive, abductive, and deductive inference pipelines. We investigate advanced paradigms such as hypothesis selection, verification, and refinement, revealing their potential to scale up logical inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T15:54:53Z)
• Constructor Theory as Process Theory [0.0]
  We show how to formulate fundamental notions of constructor theory within the canvas of process theory. We answer the question of how constructor theory relates to the broader body of process-theoretic literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-14T12:58:55Z)
• Multi-Scenario Empirical Assessment of Agile Governance Theory: A Technical Report [55.2480439325792]
  Agile Governance Theory (AGT) has emerged as a potential model for organizational chains of responsibility across business units and teams. This study aims to assess how AGT is reflected in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-03T18:50:36Z)
• Cognitive Architecture for Decision-Making Based on Brain Principles Programming (in Russian) [0.34410212782758043]
  We describe a cognitive architecture intended to solve a wide range of problems based on the five identified principles of brain activity. We provide a basic ontology for a number of practical applications as well as for the functional domain based upon it, describe the proposed architecture, and give possible examples of the execution of these applications in this architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-18T16:34:05Z)
• Hierarchical Optimization-Derived Learning [58.69200830655009]
  We establish a new framework, named Hierarchical ODL (HODL), to simultaneously investigate the intrinsic behaviors of optimization-derived model construction and its corresponding learning process. This is the first theoretical guarantee for these two coupled ODL components: optimization and learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T03:35:13Z)
• A Methodology and Software Architecture to Support Explainability-by-Design [0.0]
  This paper describes Explainability-by-Design, a holistic methodology characterised by proactive measures to include explanation capability in the design of decision-making systems. The methodology consists of three phases: (A) Explanation Requirement Analysis, (B) Explanation Technical Design, and (C) Explanation Validation. It was shown that the approach is tractable in terms of development time, which can be as low as two hours per sentence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-13T15:34:29Z)
• Cognitive Architecture for Decision-Making Based on Brain Principles Programming [0.3867363075280543]
  We describe a cognitive architecture intended to solve a wide range of problems based on the five identified principles of brain activity. We provide a basic ontology for a number of practical applications as well as for the functional domain based upon it, describe the proposed architecture, and give possible examples of the execution of these applications in this architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T04:25:20Z)
• Active Inference in Robotics and Artificial Agents: Survey and Challenges [51.29077770446286]
  We review the state-of-the-art theory and implementations of active inference for state-estimation, control, planning and learning. We showcase relevant experiments that illustrate its potential in terms of adaptation, generalization and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-03T12:10:26Z)
• Proceedings of the Sixteenth Workshop on Logical Frameworks and Meta-Languages: Theory and Practice [0.0]
  Design, implementation and their use in reasoning tasks have been the focus of considerable research over the last two decades. This workshop brings together designers, implementors and practitioners to discuss various aspects impinging on the structure and utility of logical frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-14T05:19:09Z)
• Forecasting: theory and practice [65.71277206849244]
  This article provides a non-systematic review of the theory and the practice of forecasting. We provide an overview of a wide range of theoretical, state-of-the-art models, methods, principles, and approaches. We then demonstrate how such theoretical concepts are applied in a variety of real-life contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-04T16:56:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.