The broader spectrum of in-context learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.03782v2
• Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 18:28:06 GMT
• Title: The broader spectrum of in-context learning
• Authors: Andrew Kyle Lampinen, Stephanie C. Y. Chan, Aaditya K. Singh, Murray Shanahan,
• Abstract summary: We provide a perspective that situates this type of supervised few-shot learning within a much broader spectrum of metalearned in-context learning. We suggest that any distribution of sequences in which context non-trivially decreases loss on subsequent predictions can be elicited. We close by suggesting that research on in-context learning should consider this broader spectrum in-context capabilities and types of generalization.
• Score: 13.111927028942329
• License:
• Abstract: The ability of language models to learn a task from a few examples in context has generated substantial interest. Here, we provide a perspective that situates this type of supervised few-shot learning within a much broader spectrum of meta-learned in-context learning. Indeed, we suggest that any distribution of sequences in which context non-trivially decreases loss on subsequent predictions can be interpreted as eliciting a kind of in-context learning. We suggest that this perspective helps to unify the broad set of in-context abilities that language models exhibit $\unicode{x2014}$ such as adapting to tasks from instructions or role play, or extrapolating time series. This perspective also sheds light on potential roots of in-context learning in lower-level processing of linguistic dependencies (e.g. coreference or parallel structures). Finally, taking this perspective highlights the importance of generalization, which we suggest can be studied along several dimensions: not only the ability to learn something novel, but also flexibility in learning from different presentations, and in applying what is learned. We discuss broader connections to past literature in meta-learning and goal-conditioned agents, and other perspectives on learning and adaptation. We close by suggesting that research on in-context learning should consider this broader spectrum of in-context capabilities and types of generalization.

Related papers

• Toward Understanding In-context vs. In-weight Learning [50.24035812301655]
  We identify simplified distributional properties that give rise to the emergence and disappearance of in-context learning. We then extend the study to a full large language model, showing how fine-tuning on various collections of natural language prompts can elicit similar in-context and in-weight learning behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T14:09:00Z)
• In-context Learning in Presence of Spurious Correlations [8.055478206164105]
  We study the possibility of training an in-context learner for classification tasks involving spurious features. We find that the conventional approach of training in-context learners is susceptible to spurious features. We propose a novel technique to train such a learner for a given classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T04:26:36Z)
• Improving In-Context Learning in Diffusion Models with Visual Context-Modulated Prompts [83.03471704115786]
  We introduce improved Prompt Diffusion (iPromptDiff) in this study. iPromptDiff integrates an end-to-end trained vision encoder that converts visual context into an embedding vector. We show that a diffusion-based vision foundation model, when equipped with this visual context-modulated text guidance and a standard ControlNet structure, exhibits versatility and robustness across a variety of training tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T14:15:52Z)
• MAGNIFICo: Evaluating the In-Context Learning Ability of Large Language Models to Generalize to Novel Interpretations [37.13707912132472]
  Humans possess a remarkable ability to assign novel interpretations to linguistic expressions. Large Language Models (LLMs) have a knowledge cutoff and are costly to finetune repeatedly. We systematically analyse the ability of LLMs to acquire novel interpretations using in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T00:02:38Z)
• RAVEN: In-Context Learning with Retrieval-Augmented Encoder-Decoder Language Models [57.12888828853409]
  RAVEN is a model that combines retrieval-augmented masked language modeling and prefix language modeling. Fusion-in-Context Learning enables the model to leverage more in-context examples without requiring additional training. Our work underscores the potential of retrieval-augmented encoder-decoder language models for in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T17:59:18Z)
• SINC: Self-Supervised In-Context Learning for Vision-Language Tasks [64.44336003123102]
  We propose a framework to enable in-context learning in large language models. A meta-model can learn on self-supervised prompts consisting of tailored demonstrations. Experiments show that SINC outperforms gradient-based methods in various vision-language tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-15T08:33:08Z)
• How Do In-Context Examples Affect Compositional Generalization? [86.57079616209474]
  In this paper, we present CoFe, a test suite to investigate in-context compositional generalization. We find that the compositional generalization performance can be easily affected by the selection of in-context examples. Our systematic experiments indicate that in-context examples should be structurally similar to the test case, diverse from each other, and individually simple.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T16:32:18Z)
• The Learnability of In-Context Learning [16.182561312622315]
  We propose a first-of-its-kind PAC based framework for in-context learnability. Our framework includes an initial pretraining phase, which fits a function to the pretraining distribution. We show that in-context learning is more about identifying the task than about learning it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-14T13:28:39Z)
• Rethinking the Role of Scale for In-Context Learning: An Interpretability-based Case Study at 66 Billion Scale [60.336655143884904]
  We investigate the hypothesis that the ability of a large language model to in-context learn-perform a task is not uniformly spread across its underlying components. We find substantial overlap in the set of attention heads (unimportant) for in-context learning across tasks and number of in-context examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-18T14:36:07Z)
• Towards a theory of out-of-distribution learning [23.878004729029644]
  We propose a chronological approach to defining different learning tasks using the provably approximately correct (PAC) learning framework. We will start with in-distribution learning and progress to recently proposed lifelong or continual learning. Our hope is that this work will inspire a universally agreed-upon approach to quantifying different types of learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-29T15:35:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.