How Good is ChatGPT in Giving Adaptive Guidance Using Knowledge Graphs in E-Learning Environments?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.03856v1
• Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 04:05:43 GMT
• Title: How Good is ChatGPT in Giving Adaptive Guidance Using Knowledge Graphs in E-Learning Environments?
• Authors: Patrick Ocheja, Brendan Flanagan, Yiling Dai, Hiroaki Ogata,
• Abstract summary: This study introduces an approach that integrates dynamic knowledge graphs with large language models (LLMs) to offer nuanced student assistance. Central to this method is the knowledge graph's role in assessing a student's comprehension of topic prerequisites. Preliminary findings suggest students could benefit from this tiered support, achieving enhanced comprehension and improved task outcomes.
• Score: 0.8999666725996978
• License:
• Abstract: E-learning environments are increasingly harnessing large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 for tailored educational support. This study introduces an approach that integrates dynamic knowledge graphs with LLMs to offer nuanced student assistance. By evaluating past and ongoing student interactions, the system identifies and appends the most salient learning context to prompts directed at the LLM. Central to this method is the knowledge graph's role in assessing a student's comprehension of topic prerequisites. Depending on the categorized understanding (good, average, or poor), the LLM adjusts its guidance, offering advanced assistance, foundational reviews, or in-depth prerequisite explanations, respectively. Preliminary findings suggest students could benefit from this tiered support, achieving enhanced comprehension and improved task outcomes. However, several issues related to potential errors arising from LLMs were identified, which can potentially mislead students. This highlights the need for human intervention to mitigate these risks. This research aims to advance AI-driven personalized learning while acknowledging the limitations and potential pitfalls, thus guiding future research in technology and data-driven education.

Related papers

• Do Tutors Learn from Equity Training and Can Generative AI Assess It? [2.116573423199236]
  We evaluate tutor performance within an online lesson on enhancing tutors' skills when responding to students in potentially inequitable situations. We find marginally significant learning gains with increases in tutors' self-reported confidence in their knowledge. This work makes available a dataset of lesson log data, tutor responses, rubrics for human annotation, and generative AI prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-15T17:36:40Z)
• Embracing AI in Education: Understanding the Surge in Large Language Model Use by Secondary Students [53.20318273452059]
  Large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI's ChatGPT have opened up new avenues in education. Despite school restrictions, our survey of over 300 middle and high school students revealed that a remarkable 70% of students have utilized LLMs. We propose a few ideas to address such issues, including subject-specific models, personalized learning, and AI classrooms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T19:19:34Z)
• Utilizing ChatGPT in a Data Structures and Algorithms Course: A Teaching Assistant's Perspective [1.0650780147044159]
  This research delves into the use of ChatGPT in a data structures and algorithms (DSA) course, particularly when combined with TA supervision. The findings demonstrate that incorporating ChatGPT with structured prompts and active TA guidance enhances students' understanding of intricate algorithmic concepts, boosts engagement, and academic performance. The study underscores the importance of active TA involvement in reducing students' reliance on AI-generated content and amplifying the overall educational impact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T15:18:48Z)
• Exploring Knowledge Tracing in Tutor-Student Dialogues using LLMs [49.18567856499736]
  We investigate whether large language models (LLMs) can be supportive of open-ended dialogue tutoring. We apply a range of knowledge tracing (KT) methods on the resulting labeled data to track student knowledge levels over an entire dialogue. We conduct experiments on two tutoring dialogue datasets, and show that a novel yet simple LLM-based method, LLMKT, significantly outperforms existing KT methods in predicting student response correctness in dialogues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T22:31:39Z)
• CourseAssist: Pedagogically Appropriate AI Tutor for Computer Science Education [1.052788652996288]
  This poster introduces CourseAssist, a novel LLM-based tutoring system tailored for computer science education. Unlike generic LLM systems, CourseAssist uses retrieval-augmented generation, user intent classification, and question decomposition to align AI responses with specific course materials and learning objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T20:43:06Z)
• Knowledge Graphs as Context Sources for LLM-Based Explanations of Learning Recommendations [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) and generative AI have recently opened new doors for generating human-like explanations. This paper proposes an approach to utilize knowledge graphs (KG) as a source of factual context. We utilize the semantic relations in the knowledge graph to offer curated knowledge about learning recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T14:41:12Z)
• Evaluating and Optimizing Educational Content with Large Language Model Judgments [52.33701672559594]
  We use Language Models (LMs) as educational experts to assess the impact of various instructions on learning outcomes. We introduce an instruction optimization approach in which one LM generates instructional materials using the judgments of another LM as a reward function. Human teachers' evaluations of these LM-generated worksheets show a significant alignment between the LM judgments and human teacher preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T09:09:15Z)
• C-ICL: Contrastive In-context Learning for Information Extraction [54.39470114243744]
  c-ICL is a novel few-shot technique that leverages both correct and incorrect sample constructions to create in-context learning demonstrations. Our experiments on various datasets indicate that c-ICL outperforms previous few-shot in-context learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T11:28:08Z)
• Knowledge Tracing Challenge: Optimal Activity Sequencing for Students [0.9814642627359286]
  Knowledge tracing is a method used in education to assess and track the acquisition of knowledge by individual learners. We will present the results of the implementation of two Knowledge Tracing algorithms on a newly released dataset as part of the AAAI2023 Global Knowledge Tracing Challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T16:28:34Z)
• Aligning Large Language Models with Human: A Survey [53.6014921995006]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) trained on extensive textual corpora have emerged as leading solutions for a broad array of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Despite their notable performance, these models are prone to certain limitations such as misunderstanding human instructions, generating potentially biased content, or factually incorrect information. This survey presents a comprehensive overview of these alignment technologies, including the following aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T17:44:58Z)
• Personalized Education in the AI Era: What to Expect Next? [76.37000521334585]
  The objective of personalized learning is to design an effective knowledge acquisition track that matches the learner's strengths and bypasses her weaknesses to meet her desired goal. In recent years, the boost of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has unfolded novel perspectives to enhance personalized education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T12:23:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.