Model Contribution Rate Theory: An Empirical Examination
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.05978v1
- Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 15:56:23 GMT
- Title: Model Contribution Rate Theory: An Empirical Examination
- Authors: Vincil Bishop, Steven Simske,
- Abstract summary: The paper presents a systematic methodology for analyzing software developer productivity by refining contribution rate metrics to distinguish meaningful development efforts from anomalies.<n>The findings provide actionable insights for optimizing team performance and workflow management in modern software engineering practices.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The paper presents a systematic methodology for analyzing software developer productivity by refining contribution rate metrics to distinguish meaningful development efforts from anomalies. Using the Mean-High Model Contribution Rate (mhMCR) method, the research introduces a statistical framework that focuses on continuous contributions, mitigating distortions caused by tool-assisted refactoring, delayed commits, or automated changes. The methodology integrates clustering techniques, commit time deltas, and contribution sizes to isolate natural, logical work patterns and supports the accurate imputation of effort for contributions outside these patterns. Through empirical validation across multiple commercial repositories, the mhMCR method demonstrates enhanced precision in productivity measurement in identifying sustained developer activity. The findings provide actionable insights for optimizing team performance and workflow management in modern software engineering practices.
Related papers
- Advancing Embodied Agent Security: From Safety Benchmarks to Input Moderation [52.83870601473094]
Embodied agents exhibit immense potential across a multitude of domains.
Existing research predominantly concentrates on the security of general large language models.
This paper introduces a novel input moderation framework, meticulously designed to safeguard embodied agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-22T08:34:35Z) - A Data Balancing and Ensemble Learning Approach for Credit Card Fraud Detection [1.8921747725821432]
This research introduces an innovative method for identifying credit card fraud by combining the SMOTE-KMEANS technique with an ensemble machine learning model.
The proposed model was benchmarked against traditional models such as logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, and support vector machines.
Results demonstrated that the proposed model achieved superior performance, with an AUC of 0.96 when combined with the SMOTE-KMEANS algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T04:59:45Z) - FACT-AUDIT: An Adaptive Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic Fact-Checking Evaluation of Large Language Models [79.41859481668618]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced the fact-checking studies.
Existing automated fact-checking evaluation methods rely on static datasets and classification metrics.
We introduce FACT-AUDIT, an agent-driven framework that adaptively and dynamically assesses LLMs' fact-checking capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T07:44:22Z) - The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning [62.165534879284735]
Process Reward Models (PRMs) aim to identify and mitigate intermediate errors in the reasoning processes.
We develop a consensus filtering mechanism that effectively integrates Monte Carlo (MC) estimation with Large Language Models (LLMs)
We release a new state-of-the-art PRM that outperforms existing open-source alternatives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-13T13:10:16Z) - Contribution Rate Imputation Theory: A Conceptual Model [0.0]
"Theory of Contribution Rate Imputation" estimates developer effort by analyzing historical commit data and typical development rates.
Building on the Time-Delta Method, this approach calculates unobserved work periods using metrics like cyclomatic complexity and Levenshtein distance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T22:31:11Z) - Patched RTC: evaluating LLMs for diverse software development tasks [1.14219428942199]
This paper introduces Patched Round-Trip Correctness (Patched RTC), a novel evaluation technique for Large Language Models (LLMs)
Patched RTC offers a self-evaluating framework that measures consistency and robustness of model responses without human intervention.
Experiments comparing GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 models across different software development tasks reveal that Patched RTC effectively distinguishes model performance and task difficulty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T15:12:14Z) - Borrowing Strength in Distributionally Robust Optimization via Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes [35.53901341372684]
Our approach unifies regularized estimation, distributionally robust optimization, and hierarchical Bayesian modeling.
By employing a hierarchical Dirichlet process (HDP) prior, the method effectively handles multi-source data.
Numerical experiments validate the framework's efficacy in improving and stabilizing both prediction and parameter estimation accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-21T19:03:09Z) - Task-optimal data-driven surrogate models for eNMPC via differentiable simulation and optimization [42.72938925647165]
We present a method for end-to-end learning of Koopman surrogate models for optimal performance in a specific control task.
We evaluate the performance of our method by comparing it to that of other training algorithms on an existing economic nonlinear model predictive control (eNMPC) case study.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T14:28:43Z) - A Thorough Examination of Decoding Methods in the Era of LLMs [72.65956436513241]
Decoding methods play an indispensable role in converting language models from next-token predictors into practical task solvers.
This paper provides a comprehensive and multifaceted analysis of various decoding methods within the context of large language models.
Our findings reveal that decoding method performance is notably task-dependent and influenced by factors such as alignment, model size, and quantization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-10T11:14:53Z) - QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement.
QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights.
We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z) - Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for
Reasoning [64.27898739929734]
Process-Supervised Reward Model (PRM) furnishes LLMs with step-by-step feedback during the training phase.
We propose a greedy search algorithm that employs the step-level feedback from PRM to optimize the reasoning pathways explored by LLMs.
To explore the versatility of our approach, we develop a novel method to automatically generate step-level reward dataset for coding tasks and observed similar improved performance in the code generation tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-16T05:21:50Z) - PerfDetectiveAI -- Performance Gap Analysis and Recommendation in
Software Applications [0.0]
PerfDetectiveAI, a conceptual framework for performance gap analysis and suggestion in software applications is introduced in this research.
Modern machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques are used in PerfDetectiveAI to monitor performance measurements and identify areas of underperformance in software applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-11T02:53:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.