Seeing Syntax: Uncovering Syntactic Learning Limitations in Vision-Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.08111v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 05:37:04 GMT
• Title: Seeing Syntax: Uncovering Syntactic Learning Limitations in Vision-Language Models
• Authors: Sri Harsha Dumpala, David Arps, Sageev Oore, Laura Kallmeyer, Hassan Sajjad,
• Abstract summary: Vision-language models (VLMs) serve as foundation models for image captioning and text-to-image generation. Recent studies have highlighted limitations in VLM text encoders, particularly in areas like compositionality and semantic understanding.
• Score: 18.87130615326443
• License:
• Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs), serve as foundation models for multi-modal applications such as image captioning and text-to-image generation. Recent studies have highlighted limitations in VLM text encoders, particularly in areas like compositionality and semantic understanding, though the underlying reasons for these limitations remain unclear. In this work, we aim to address this gap by analyzing the syntactic information, one of the fundamental linguistic properties, encoded by the text encoders of VLMs. We perform a thorough analysis comparing VLMs with different objective functions, parameter size and training data size, and with uni-modal language models (ULMs) in their ability to encode syntactic knowledge. Our findings suggest that ULM text encoders acquire syntactic information more effectively than those in VLMs. The syntactic information learned by VLM text encoders is shaped primarily by the pre-training objective, which plays a more crucial role than other factors such as model architecture, model size, or the volume of pre-training data. Models exhibit different layer-wise trends where CLIP performance dropped across layers while for other models, middle layers are rich in encoding syntactic knowledge.

Related papers

• MUSE-VL: Modeling Unified VLM through Semantic Discrete Encoding [6.538592344967826]
  We introduce MUSE-VL, a Unified Vision-Language Model Semantic through discrete -language for multimodal understanding and generation. The proposed model significantly surpasses the previous state-of-the-art in various vision-language benchmarks and achieves better performance than dedicated understanding models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T03:33:52Z)
• Eagle: Exploring The Design Space for Multimodal LLMs with Mixture of Encoders [89.38717274524681]
  This study explores the design space for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) using a mixture of vision encoders and resolutions. Our findings reveal several underlying principles common to various existing strategies, leading to a streamlined yet effective design approach. The resulting family of MLLMs, Eagle, surpasses other leading open-source models on major MLLM benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T17:59:31Z)
• Img-Diff: Contrastive Data Synthesis for Multimodal Large Language Models [49.439311430360284]
  We introduce a novel data synthesis method inspired by contrastive learning and image difference captioning. Our key idea involves challenging the model to discern both matching and distinct elements. We leverage this generated dataset to fine-tune state-of-the-art (SOTA) MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T17:10:16Z)
• Rethinking Visual Prompting for Multimodal Large Language Models with External Knowledge [76.45868419402265]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have made significant strides by training on vast high-quality image-text datasets. However, the inherent difficulty in explicitly conveying fine-grained or spatially dense information in text, such as masks, poses a challenge for MLLMs. This paper proposes a new visual prompt approach to integrate fine-grained external knowledge, gleaned from specialized vision models, into MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T17:43:30Z)
• SUGARCREPE++ Dataset: Vision-Language Model Sensitivity to Semantic and Lexical Alterations [13.608653575298183]
  We introduce the SUGARCREPE++ dataset to analyze the sensitivity of vision-and-language models to semantic alterations. We show that all the models which achieve better performance on compositionality datasets need not perform equally well on SUGARCREPE++.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T03:22:20Z)
• Q-GroundCAM: Quantifying Grounding in Vision Language Models via GradCAM [3.2688425993442696]
  Many probing studies have revealed that even the best-performing Vision and Language Models (VLMs) struggle to capture aspects of compositional scene understanding. Recent VLM advancements include scaling up both model and dataset sizes, additional training objectives and levels of supervision. This paper introduces a novel suite of quantitative metrics that utilize GradCAM activations to rigorously evaluate the grounding capabilities of pre-trained VLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T22:06:17Z)
• Synth$^2$: Boosting Visual-Language Models with Synthetic Captions and Image Embeddings [16.28853186016663]
  We create synthetic image-text pairs for efficient and effective Visual-Language Models (VLMs) training. Our method employs a pretrained text-to-image model to synthesize image embeddings from captions generated by an LLM. Our VLM, finetuned on synthetic data achieves comparable performance to models trained solely on human-annotated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T15:36:42Z)
• CODIS: Benchmarking Context-Dependent Visual Comprehension for Multimodal Large Language Models [58.95889895912716]
  We introduce a new benchmark, named as CODIS, designed to assess the ability of models to use context provided in free-form text to enhance visual comprehension. Our findings indicate that MLLMs consistently fall short of human performance on this benchmark. This underscores the pressing need to enhance the ability of MLLMs to comprehend visuals in a context-dependent manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:21:12Z)
• Exploring the Frontier of Vision-Language Models: A Survey of Current Methodologies and Future Directions [11.786387517781328]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are advanced models that can tackle more intricate tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering. Our classification organizes VLMs into three distinct categories: models dedicated to vision-language understanding, models that process multimodal inputs to generate unimodal (textual) outputs and models that both accept and produce multimodal inputs and outputs. We meticulously dissect each model, offering an extensive analysis of its foundational architecture, training data sources, as well as its strengths and limitations wherever possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T18:57:34Z)
• Unified Language-Vision Pretraining in LLM with Dynamic Discrete Visual Tokenization [52.935150075484074]
  We introduce a well-designed visual tokenizer to translate the non-linguistic image into a sequence of discrete tokens like a foreign language. The resulting visual tokens encompass high-level semantics worthy of a word and also support dynamic sequence length varying from the image. This unification empowers LaVIT to serve as an impressive generalist interface to understand and generate multi-modal content simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-09T03:01:38Z)
• Position-Enhanced Visual Instruction Tuning for Multimodal Large Language Models [50.07056960586183]
  We propose Position-enhanced Visual Instruction Tuning (PVIT) to extend the functionality of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) This integration promotes a more detailed comprehension of images for the MLLM. We present both quantitative experiments and qualitative analysis that demonstrate the superiority of the proposed model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T15:33:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.