Reinforcement Learning Enhanced LLMs: A Survey

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10400v3
• Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 08:57:10 GMT
• Title: Reinforcement Learning Enhanced LLMs: A Survey
• Authors: Shuhe Wang, Shengyu Zhang, Jie Zhang, Runyi Hu, Xiaoya Li, Tianwei Zhang, Jiwei Li, Fei Wu, Guoyin Wang, Eduard Hovy,
• Abstract summary: We will make a systematic review of the most up-to-date state of knowledge on RL-enhanced large language models (LLMs)<n>Specifically, we detail the basics of RL; (2) introduce popular RL-enhanced LLMs; (3) review researches on two widely-used reward model-based RL techniques: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF)
• Score: 45.57586245741664
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) enhanced large language models (LLMs), particularly exemplified by DeepSeek-R1, have exhibited outstanding performance. Despite the effectiveness in improving LLM capabilities, its implementation remains highly complex, requiring complex algorithms, reward modeling strategies, and optimization techniques. This complexity poses challenges for researchers and practitioners in developing a systematic understanding of RL-enhanced LLMs. Moreover, the absence of a comprehensive survey summarizing existing research on RL-enhanced LLMs has limited progress in this domain, hindering further advancements. In this work, we are going to make a systematic review of the most up-to-date state of knowledge on RL-enhanced LLMs, attempting to consolidate and analyze the rapidly growing research in this field, helping researchers understand the current challenges and advancements. Specifically, we (1) detail the basics of RL; (2) introduce popular RL-enhanced LLMs; (3) review researches on two widely-used reward model-based RL techniques: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF); and (4) explore Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), a set of methods that bypass the reward model to directly use human preference data for aligning LLM outputs with human expectations. We will also point out current challenges and deficiencies of existing methods and suggest some avenues for further improvements. Project page of this work can be found at https://github.com/ShuheWang1998/Reinforcement-Learning-Enhanced-LLMs-A-Survey.

Related papers

• Improving RL Exploration for LLM Reasoning through Retrospective Replay [45.00643118030677]
  We propose a novel algorithm named Retrospective Replay-based Reinforcement Learning (RRL), which introduces a dynamic replay mechanism throughout the training process. RRL enables the model to revisit promising states identified in the early stages, thereby improving its efficiency and effectiveness in exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-19T17:40:04Z)
• SWEET-RL: Training Multi-Turn LLM Agents on Collaborative Reasoning Tasks [110.20297293596005]
  Large language model (LLM) agents need to perform multi-turn interactions in real-world tasks. Existing multi-turn RL algorithms for optimizing LLM agents fail to perform effective credit assignment over multiple turns while leveraging the generalization capabilities of LLMs. We propose a novel RL algorithm, SWEET-RL, that uses a carefully designed optimization objective to train a critic model with access to additional training-time information. Our experiments demonstrate that SWEET-RL achieves a 6% absolute improvement in success and win rates on ColBench compared to other state-of-the-art multi-turn RL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T17:55:08Z)
• R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [87.30285670315334]
  textbfR1-Searcher is a novel two-stage outcome-based RL approach designed to enhance the search capabilities of Large Language Models. Our framework relies exclusively on RL, without requiring process rewards or distillation for a cold start. Our experiments demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms previous strong RAG methods, even when compared to the closed-source GPT-4o-mini.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T17:14:44Z)
• Satori: Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Action-Thought Enhances LLM Reasoning via Autoregressive Search [57.28671084993782]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities across diverse domains. Recent studies have shown that increasing test-time computation enhances LLMs' reasoning capabilities. We propose a two-stage training paradigm: 1) a small-scale format tuning stage to internalize the COAT reasoning format and 2) a large-scale self-improvement stage leveraging reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T17:26:58Z)
• Extracting Heuristics from Large Language Models for Reward Shaping in Reinforcement Learning [28.077228879886402]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) suffers from sample inefficiency in reward domains, and the problem is further pronounced in case of transitions. To improve the sample efficiency, reward shaping is a well-studied approach to introduce intrinsic rewards that can help the RL agent converge to an optimal policy faster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T03:53:57Z)
• Weak-to-Strong Extrapolation Expedites Alignment [135.12769233630362]
  We propose a method called ExPO to boost models' alignment with human preference. We demonstrate that ExPO consistently improves off-the-shelf DPO/RLHF models. We shed light on the essence of ExPO amplifying the reward signal learned during alignment training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T17:39:50Z)
• Reinforcement Learning from Reflective Feedback (RLRF): Aligning and Improving LLMs via Fine-Grained Self-Reflection [24.435121488662897]
  We propose a novel framework: Reinforcement Learning from Reflective Feedback (RLRF) RLRF employs a self-reflection mechanism to systematically explore and refine LLM responses, then fine-tuning the models via a RL algorithm along with promising responses. Our experiments across Just-Eval, Factuality, and Mathematical Reasoning demonstrate the efficacy and transformative potential of RLRF.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T08:57:27Z)
• How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach [68.55316627400683]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the de facto standard practice for sequential decision-making problems by improving future acting policies with feedback. Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive capabilities in language understanding and generation, yet they fall short in exploration and self-improvement capabilities. We develop an algorithm named LINVIT that incorporates LLM guidance as a regularization factor in value-based RL, leading to significant reductions in the amount of data needed for learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T20:07:13Z)
• Reinforcement Learning from LLM Feedback to Counteract Goal Misgeneralization [0.0]
  We introduce a method to address goal misgeneralization in reinforcement learning (RL) Goal misgeneralization occurs when an agent retains its capabilities out-of-distribution yet pursues a proxy rather than the intended one. This study demonstrates how the Large Language Model can efficiently supervise RL agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-14T01:09:48Z)
• Mutual Enhancement of Large Language and Reinforcement Learning Models through Bi-Directional Feedback Mechanisms: A Case Study [1.3597551064547502]
  We employ a teacher-student learning framework to tackle problems of Large Language Models (LLMs) and reinforcement learning (RL) models. Within this framework, the LLM acts as a teacher, while the RL model acts as a student. We propose a practical algorithm to address the problem and conduct empirical experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of our method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T14:35:57Z)
• Aligning Large Language Models with Human: A Survey [53.6014921995006]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) trained on extensive textual corpora have emerged as leading solutions for a broad array of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Despite their notable performance, these models are prone to certain limitations such as misunderstanding human instructions, generating potentially biased content, or factually incorrect information. This survey presents a comprehensive overview of these alignment technologies, including the following aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T17:44:58Z)
• Ensemble Reinforcement Learning: A Survey [43.17635633600716]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a highly effective technique for addressing various scientific and applied problems. In response, ensemble reinforcement learning (ERL), a promising approach that combines the benefits of both RL and ensemble learning (EL), has gained widespread popularity. ERL leverages multiple models or training algorithms to comprehensively explore the problem space and possesses strong generalization capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-05T09:26:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.