RecSys Arena: Pair-wise Recommender System Evaluation with Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11068v1
• Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 05:57:36 GMT
• Title: RecSys Arena: Pair-wise Recommender System Evaluation with Large Language Models
• Authors: Zhuo Wu, Qinglin Jia, Chuhan Wu, Zhaocheng Du, Shuai Wang, Zan Wang, Zhenhua Dong,
• Abstract summary: We present the idea of RecSys Arena, where the recommendation results given by two different recommender systems are evaluated by an LLM judger to obtain fine-grained evaluation feedback. We demonstrate that many different LLMs provide general evaluation results that are highly consistent with canonical offline metrics. It can better distinguish different algorithms with comparable performance in terms of AUC and nDCG.
• Score: 40.74293642666989
• License:
• Abstract: Evaluating the quality of recommender systems is critical for algorithm design and optimization. Most evaluation methods are computed based on offline metrics for quick algorithm evolution, since online experiments are usually risky and time-consuming. However, offline evaluation usually cannot fully reflect users' preference for the outcome of different recommendation algorithms, and the results may not be consistent with online A/B test. Moreover, many offline metrics such as AUC do not offer sufficient information for comparing the subtle differences between two competitive recommender systems in different aspects, which may lead to substantial performance differences in long-term online serving. Fortunately, due to the strong commonsense knowledge and role-play capability of large language models (LLMs), it is possible to obtain simulated user feedback on offline recommendation results. Motivated by the idea of LLM Chatbot Arena, in this paper we present the idea of RecSys Arena, where the recommendation results given by two different recommender systems in each session are evaluated by an LLM judger to obtain fine-grained evaluation feedback. More specifically, for each sample we use LLM to generate a user profile description based on user behavior history or off-the-shelf profile features, which is used to guide LLM to play the role of this user and evaluate the relative preference for two recommendation results generated by different models. Through extensive experiments on two recommendation datasets in different scenarios, we demonstrate that many different LLMs not only provide general evaluation results that are highly consistent with canonical offline metrics, but also provide rich insight in many subjective aspects. Moreover, it can better distinguish different algorithms with comparable performance in terms of AUC and nDCG.

Related papers

• Varco Arena: A Tournament Approach to Reference-Free Benchmarking Large Language Models [0.29687381456164]
  VARCO Arena is a novel, cost-effective, and robust benchmarking approach for large language models. Our results demonstrate that VARCO Arena not only produces reliable LLM rankings but also provides a scalable, adaptable solution for qualitative evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T15:23:28Z)
• CompassJudger-1: All-in-one Judge Model Helps Model Evaluation and Evolution [74.41064280094064]
  textbfJudger-1 is the first open-source textbfall-in-one judge LLM. CompassJudger-1 is a general-purpose LLM that demonstrates remarkable versatility. textbfJudgerBench is a new benchmark that encompasses various subjective evaluation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T17:56:51Z)
• Active Evaluation Acquisition for Efficient LLM Benchmarking [18.85604491151409]
  We investigate strategies to improve evaluation efficiency by selecting a subset of examples from each benchmark using a learned policy. Our approach models the dependencies across test examples, allowing accurate prediction of the evaluation outcomes for the remaining examples. Empirical results demonstrate that our approach significantly reduces the number of evaluation prompts required.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T12:08:46Z)
• AIME: AI System Optimization via Multiple LLM Evaluators [79.03422337674664]
  AIME is an evaluation protocol that utilizes multiple LLMs that each independently generate an evaluation on separate criteria and then combine them via concatenation. We show AIME outperforming baseline methods in code generation tasks, with up to $62%$ higher error detection rate and up to $16%$ higher success rate than a single LLM evaluation protocol on LeetCodeHard and HumanEval datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T04:03:24Z)
• Efficient LLM Comparative Assessment: a Product of Experts Framework for Pairwise Comparisons [10.94304714004328]
  This paper introduces a Product of Expert (PoE) framework for efficient Comparative Assessment. Individual comparisons are considered experts that provide information on a pair's score difference. PoE framework combines the information from these experts to yield an expression that can be maximized with respect to the underlying set of candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T16:45:27Z)
• Efficient and Responsible Adaptation of Large Language Models for Robust Top-k Recommendations [11.004673022505566]
  Long user queries from millions of users can degrade the performance of large language models for recommendation. We propose a hybrid task allocation framework that utilizes the capabilities of both large language models and traditional recommendation systems. Our results on three real-world datasets show a significant reduction in weak users and improved robustness of RSs to sub-populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T19:11:47Z)
• Query-Dependent Prompt Evaluation and Optimization with Offline Inverse RL [62.824464372594576]
  We aim to enhance arithmetic reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) through zero-shot prompt optimization. We identify a previously overlooked objective of query dependency in such optimization. We introduce Prompt-OIRL, which harnesses offline inverse reinforcement learning to draw insights from offline prompting demonstration data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T01:12:52Z)
• LLM Comparative Assessment: Zero-shot NLG Evaluation through Pairwise Comparisons using Large Language Models [55.60306377044225]
  Large language models (LLMs) have enabled impressive zero-shot capabilities across various natural language tasks. This paper explores two options for exploiting the emergent abilities of LLMs for zero-shot NLG assessment. For moderate-sized open-source LLMs, such as FlanT5 and Llama2-chat, comparative assessment is superior to prompt scoring.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-15T22:02:12Z)
• Do Offline Metrics Predict Online Performance in Recommender Systems? [79.48653445643865]
  We investigate the extent to which offline metrics predict online performance by evaluating recommenders across six simulated environments. We observe that offline metrics are correlated with online performance over a range of environments. We study the impact of adding exploration strategies, and observe that their effectiveness, when compared to greedy recommendation, is highly dependent on the recommendation algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-07T01:41:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.