Sequential Harmful Shift Detection Without Labels

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.12910v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 13:37:48 GMT
• Title: Sequential Harmful Shift Detection Without Labels
• Authors: Salim I. Amoukou, Tom Bewley, Saumitra Mishra, Freddy Lecue, Daniele Magazzeni, Manuela Veloso,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel approach for detecting distribution shifts that negatively impact the performance of machine learning models in continuous production environments. It builds upon the work of Podkopaev and Ramdas [2022], who address scenarios where labels are available for tracking model errors over time. Our solution extends this framework to work in the absence of labels, by employing a proxy for the true error.
• Score: 18.465525086385284
• License:
• Abstract: We introduce a novel approach for detecting distribution shifts that negatively impact the performance of machine learning models in continuous production environments, which requires no access to ground truth data labels. It builds upon the work of Podkopaev and Ramdas [2022], who address scenarios where labels are available for tracking model errors over time. Our solution extends this framework to work in the absence of labels, by employing a proxy for the true error. This proxy is derived using the predictions of a trained error estimator. Experiments show that our method has high power and false alarm control under various distribution shifts, including covariate and label shifts and natural shifts over geography and time.

Related papers

• Rethinking Precision of Pseudo Label: Test-Time Adaptation via Complementary Learning [10.396596055773012]
  We propose a novel complementary learning approach to enhance test-time adaptation. In test-time adaptation tasks, information from the source domain is typically unavailable. We highlight that the risk function of complementary labels agrees with their Vanilla loss formula.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-15T03:36:33Z)
• Losses over Labels: Weakly Supervised Learning via Direct Loss Construction [71.11337906077483]
  Programmable weak supervision is a growing paradigm within machine learning. We propose Losses over Labels (LoL) as it creates losses directly from ofs without going through the intermediate step of a label. We show that LoL improves upon existing weak supervision methods on several benchmark text and image classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T22:29:14Z)
• Dist-PU: Positive-Unlabeled Learning from a Label Distribution Perspective [89.5370481649529]
  We propose a label distribution perspective for PU learning in this paper. Motivated by this, we propose to pursue the label distribution consistency between predicted and ground-truth label distributions. Experiments on three benchmark datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-06T07:38:29Z)
• Tackling Instance-Dependent Label Noise with Dynamic Distribution Calibration [18.59803726676361]
  Instance-dependent label noise is realistic but rather challenging, where the label-corruption process depends on instances directly. It causes a severe distribution shift between the distributions of training and test data, which impairs the generalization of trained models. In this paper, to address the distribution shift in learning with instance-dependent label noise, a dynamic distribution-calibration strategy is adopted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T03:50:52Z)
• Label Matching Semi-Supervised Object Detection [85.99282969977541]
  Semi-supervised object detection has made significant progress with the development of mean teacher driven self-training. Label mismatch problem is not yet fully explored in the previous works, leading to severe confirmation bias during self-training. We propose a simple yet effective LabelMatch framework from two different yet complementary perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-14T05:59:41Z)
• Tracking the risk of a deployed model and detecting harmful distribution shifts [105.27463615756733]
  In practice, it may make sense to ignore benign shifts, under which the performance of a deployed model does not degrade substantially. We argue that a sensible method for firing off a warning has to both (a) detect harmful shifts while ignoring benign ones, and (b) allow continuous monitoring of model performance without increasing the false alarm rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T17:21:41Z)
• Training on Test Data with Bayesian Adaptation for Covariate Shift [96.3250517412545]
  Deep neural networks often make inaccurate predictions with unreliable uncertainty estimates. We derive a Bayesian model that provides for a well-defined relationship between unlabeled inputs under distributional shift and model parameters. We show that our method improves both accuracy and uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T01:09:08Z)
• Coping with Label Shift via Distributionally Robust Optimisation [72.80971421083937]
  We propose a model that minimises an objective based on distributionally robust optimisation (DRO) We then design and analyse a gradient descent-proximal mirror ascent algorithm tailored for large-scale problems to optimise the proposed objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-23T08:33:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.