Segmentation with Noisy Labels via Spatially Correlated Distributions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14795v1
• Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 01:50:10 GMT
• Title: Segmentation with Noisy Labels via Spatially Correlated Distributions
• Authors: Ryu Tadokoro, Tsukasa Takagi, Shin-ichi Maeda,
• Abstract summary: We propose an approximate Bayesian estimation based on a probabilistic model that assumes training data includes label errors.<n>We show that the proposed method achieves performance comparable to training with clean labels under moderate noise levels.
• Score: 3.522950356329991
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In semantic segmentation, the accuracy of models heavily depends on the high-quality annotations. However, in many practical scenarios such as medical imaging and remote sensing, obtaining true annotations is not straightforward and usually requires significant human labor. Relying on human labor often introduces annotation errors, including mislabeling, omissions, and inconsistency between annotators. In the case of remote sensing, differences in procurement time can lead to misaligned ground truth annotations. These label errors are not independently distributed, and instead usually appear in spatially connected regions where adjacent pixels are more likely to share the same errors. To address these issues, we propose an approximate Bayesian estimation based on a probabilistic model that assumes training data includes label errors, incorporating the tendency for these errors to occur with spatial correlations between adjacent pixels. Bayesian inference requires computing the posterior distribution of label errors, which becomes intractable when spatial correlations are present. We represent the correlation of label errors between adjacent pixels through a Gaussian distribution whose covariance is structured by a Kac-Murdock-Szeg\"{o} (KMS) matrix, solving the computational challenges. Through experiments on multiple segmentation tasks, we confirm that leveraging the spatial correlation of label errors significantly improves performance. Notably, in specific tasks such as lung segmentation, the proposed method achieves performance comparable to training with clean labels under moderate noise levels. Code is available at https://github.com/pfnet-research/Bayesian_SpatialCorr.

Related papers

• Label Distribution Learning with Biased Annotations by Learning Multi-Label Representation [120.97262070068224]
  Multi-label learning (MLL) has gained attention for its ability to represent real-world data.<n>Label Distribution Learning (LDL) faces challenges in collecting accurate label distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T09:04:03Z)
• Sequential Harmful Shift Detection Without Labels [18.465525086385284]
  We introduce a novel approach for detecting distribution shifts that negatively impact the performance of machine learning models in continuous production environments. It builds upon the work of Podkopaev and Ramdas [2022], who address scenarios where labels are available for tracking model errors over time. Our solution extends this framework to work in the absence of labels, by employing a proxy for the true error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T13:37:48Z)
• Inaccurate Label Distribution Learning with Dependency Noise [52.08553913094809]
  We introduce the Dependent Noise-based Inaccurate Label Distribution Learning (DN-ILDL) framework to tackle the challenges posed by noise in label distribution learning. We show that DN-ILDL effectively addresses the ILDL problem and outperforms existing LDL methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T07:58:07Z)
• Learning to Segment from Noisy Annotations: A Spatial Correction Approach [12.604673584405385]
  Noisy labels can significantly affect the performance of deep neural networks (DNNs) We propose a novel Markov model for segmentation noisy annotations that encodes both spatial correlation and bias. Our approach outperforms current state-of-the-art methods on both synthetic and real-world noisy annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-21T00:27:40Z)
• Estimating label quality and errors in semantic segmentation data via any model [19.84626033109009]
  We study methods to score label quality, such that the images with the lowest scores are least likely to be correctly labeled. This helps prioritize what data to review in order to ensure a high-quality training/evaluation dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T07:29:09Z)
• All Points Matter: Entropy-Regularized Distribution Alignment for Weakly-supervised 3D Segmentation [67.30502812804271]
  Pseudo-labels are widely employed in weakly supervised 3D segmentation tasks where only sparse ground-truth labels are available for learning. We propose a novel learning strategy to regularize the generated pseudo-labels and effectively narrow the gaps between pseudo-labels and model predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T08:19:31Z)
• Dist-PU: Positive-Unlabeled Learning from a Label Distribution Perspective [89.5370481649529]
  We propose a label distribution perspective for PU learning in this paper. Motivated by this, we propose to pursue the label distribution consistency between predicted and ground-truth label distributions. Experiments on three benchmark datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-06T07:38:29Z)
• Label distribution learning via label correlation grid [9.340734188957727]
  We propose a textbfLabel textbfCorrelation textbfGrid (LCG) to model the uncertainty of label relationships. Our network learns the LCG to accurately estimate the label distribution for each instance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T03:58:15Z)
• Automated Detection of Label Errors in Semantic Segmentation Datasets via Deep Learning and Uncertainty Quantification [5.279257531335345]
  We for the first time present a method for detecting label errors in semantic segmentation datasets with pixel-wise labels. Our approach is able to detect the vast majority of label errors while controlling the number of false label error detections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-13T10:25:23Z)
• Training on Test Data with Bayesian Adaptation for Covariate Shift [96.3250517412545]
  Deep neural networks often make inaccurate predictions with unreliable uncertainty estimates. We derive a Bayesian model that provides for a well-defined relationship between unlabeled inputs under distributional shift and model parameters. We show that our method improves both accuracy and uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T01:09:08Z)
• Improving Face Recognition by Clustering Unlabeled Faces in the Wild [77.48677160252198]
  We propose a novel identity separation method based on extreme value theory. It greatly reduces the problems caused by overlapping-identity label noise. Experiments on both controlled and real settings demonstrate our method's consistent improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T12:26:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.