A Comprehensive Evaluation of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning on Method-Level Code Smell Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13801v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 12:48:36 GMT
• Title: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning on Method-Level Code Smell Detection
• Authors: Beiqi Zhang, Peng Liang, Xin Zhou, Xiyu Zhou, David Lo, Qiong Feng, Zengyang Li, Lin Li,
• Abstract summary: Existing detection methods, relying on Codes or Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) techniques, often face limitations such as unsatisfactory performance. This study evaluates state-of-the-art PEFT methods on both small and large Language Models for detecting two types of method-level code smells: Complex Conditional and Complex Method. Results show that PEFT methods achieve comparable or better performance than full fine-tuning while consuming less GPU memory.
• Score: 11.9757082688031
• License:
• Abstract: Code smells are suboptimal coding practices that negatively impact the quality of software systems. Existing detection methods, relying on heuristics or Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) techniques, often face limitations such as unsatisfactory performance. Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods have emerged as a resource-efficient approach for adapting LLMs to specific tasks, but their effectiveness for method-level code smell detection remains underexplored. In this regard, this study evaluates state-of-the-art PEFT methods on both small and large Language Models (LMs) for detecting two types of method-level code smells: Complex Conditional and Complex Method. Using high-quality datasets sourced from GitHub, we fine-tuned four small LMs and six LLMs with PEFT techniques, including prompt tuning, prefix tuning, LoRA, and (IA)3. Results show that PEFT methods achieve comparable or better performance than full fine-tuning while consuming less GPU memory. Notably, LLMs did not outperform small LMs, suggesting smaller models' suitability for this task. Additionally, increasing training dataset size significantly boosted performance, while increasing trainable parameters did not. Our findings highlight PEFT methods as effective and scalable solutions, outperforming existing heuristic-based and DL-based detectors.

Related papers

• Bilevel ZOFO: Bridging Parameter-Efficient and Zeroth-Order Techniques for Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning and Meta-Training [44.48966200270378]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) for downstream tasks using First-Order (FO)imats presents significant computational challenges. We propose a bilevel optimization framework that complements ZO methods with PEFT to mitigate sensitivity to hard prompts. Our Bilevel ZOFO method employs a double-loop optimization strategy, where only the gradient of the PEFT model and the forward pass of the base model are required.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T20:47:44Z)
• Adaptive Pruning for Large Language Models with Structural Importance Awareness [66.2690963378878]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly improved language understanding and generation capabilities. LLMs are difficult to deploy on resource-constrained edge devices due to their high computational and storage resource demands. We propose structurally-aware adaptive pruning (SAAP) to significantly reduce the computational and memory costs while maintaining model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T18:08:04Z)
• Refining Salience-Aware Sparse Fine-Tuning Strategies for Language Models [14.68920095399595]
  sparsity-based PEFT (SPEFT) introduces trainable sparse adaptations to the weight matrices in the model. We conduct the first systematic evaluation of salience metrics for SPEFT, inspired by zero-cost NAS proxies. Our work challenges the notion that complexity is necessary for effective PEFT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T04:14:35Z)
• Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models for Unit Test Generation: An Empirical Study [3.5189934649278922]
  Large language models (LLMs) like GitHub Copilot struggle with real-world tasks without fine-tuning. This paper investigates full fine-tuning and various PEFT methods, including LoRA, (IA)3, and prompt tuning. Our findings show that PEFT methods can deliver performance comparable to full fine-tuning for unit test generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T09:03:18Z)
• Reference Trustable Decoding: A Training-Free Augmentation Paradigm for Large Language Models [79.41139393080736]
  Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced and demonstrated impressive capabilities. In-Context Learning (ICL) and. Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) are currently two mainstream methods for augmenting. LLMs to downstream tasks. We propose Reference Trustable Decoding (RTD), a paradigm that allows models to quickly adapt to new tasks without fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T10:48:20Z)
• Search for Efficient Large Language Models [52.98684997131108]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have long held sway in the realms of artificial intelligence research. Weight pruning, quantization, and distillation have been embraced to compress LLMs, targeting memory reduction and inference acceleration. Most model compression techniques concentrate on weight optimization, overlooking the exploration of optimal architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T21:32:12Z)
• CoMMIT: Coordinated Instruction Tuning for Multimodal Large Language Models [68.64605538559312]
  In this paper, we analyze the MLLM instruction tuning from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. Inspired by our findings, we propose a measurement to quantitatively evaluate the learning balance. In addition, we introduce an auxiliary loss regularization method to promote updating of the generation distribution of MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T23:18:55Z)
• Bypass Back-propagation: Optimization-based Structural Pruning for Large Language Models via Policy Gradient [57.9629676017527]
  We propose an optimization-based structural pruning on Large-Language Models. We learn the pruning masks in a probabilistic space directly by optimizing the loss of the pruned model. Our method operates for 2.7 hours with around 35GB memory for the 13B models on a single A100 GPU.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-15T09:31:03Z)
• Empirical Studies of Parameter Efficient Methods for Large Language Models of Code and Knowledge Transfer to R [1.9799527196428242]
  We evaluate PEFT methods, LoRA, Compacter, and IA3 on Large Language Models for code summarization and generation. Our experiments reveal that LoRA consistently outperforms Compacter and IA3 in all settings. Our study can direct future research in developing code intelligent tasks for unseen languages including R.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-16T03:12:45Z)
• LoRETTA: Low-Rank Economic Tensor-Train Adaptation for Ultra-Low-Parameter Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models [20.5908375260123]
  Various parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) techniques have been proposed to enable computationally efficient fine-tuning while maintaining model performance. We present LoRETTA, a framework that significantly reduces trainable parameters through tensor-train decomposition. LoRETTA achieves comparable or better performance than most widely used PEFT methods with up to $100times$ fewer parameters on the LLaMA-2-7B models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T01:20:00Z)
• Robust Analysis of Multi-Task Learning Efficiency: New Benchmarks on Light-Weighed Backbones and Effective Measurement of Multi-Task Learning Challenges by Feature Disentanglement [69.51496713076253]
  In this paper, we focus on the aforementioned efficiency aspects of existing MTL methods. We first carry out large-scale experiments of the methods with smaller backbones and on a the MetaGraspNet dataset as a new test ground. We also propose Feature Disentanglement measure as a novel and efficient identifier of the challenges in MTL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T22:15:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.