Syzygy: Dual Code-Test C to (safe) Rust Translation using LLMs and Dynamic Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14234v2
• Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 18:49:38 GMT
• Title: Syzygy: Dual Code-Test C to (safe) Rust Translation using LLMs and Dynamic Analysis
• Authors: Manish Shetty, Naman Jain, Adwait Godbole, Sanjit A. Seshia, Koushik Sen,
• Abstract summary: Syzygy is an automated approach to translate C to safe Rust. This is the largest automated and test-validated C to safe Rust code translation achieved so far.
• Score: 8.361424157571468
• License:
• Abstract: Despite extensive usage in high-performance, low-level systems programming applications, C is susceptible to vulnerabilities due to manual memory management and unsafe pointer operations. Rust, a modern systems programming language, offers a compelling alternative. Its unique ownership model and type system ensure memory safety without sacrificing performance. In this paper, we present Syzygy, an automated approach to translate C to safe Rust. Our technique uses a synergistic combination of LLM-driven code and test translation guided by dynamic-analysis-generated execution information. This paired translation runs incrementally in a loop over the program in dependency order of the code elements while maintaining per-step correctness. Our approach exposes novel insights on combining the strengths of LLMs and dynamic analysis in the context of scaling and combining code generation with testing. We apply our approach to successfully translate Zopfli, a high-performance compression library with ~3000 lines of code and 98 functions. We validate the translation by testing equivalence with the source C program on a set of inputs. To our knowledge, this is the largest automated and test-validated C to safe Rust code translation achieved so far.

Related papers

• ReF Decompile: Relabeling and Function Call Enhanced Decompile [50.86228893636785]
  The goal of decompilation is to convert compiled low-level code (e.g., assembly code) back into high-level programming languages. This task supports various reverse engineering applications, such as vulnerability identification, malware analysis, and legacy software migration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T12:38:57Z)
• Translating C To Rust: Lessons from a User Study [12.49361031696427]
  Rust aims to offer full memory safety for programs, a guarantee that untamed C programs do not enjoy. We report on a user study asking humans to translate real-world C programs to Rust. Our participants are able to produce safe Rust translations, whereas state-of-the-art automatic tools are not able to do so.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T14:37:05Z)
• Context-aware Code Segmentation for C-to-Rust Translation using Large Language Models [1.8416014644193066]
  Large language models (LLMs) show promise for automating this translation by generating more natural and safer code than rule-based methods. We propose an LLM-based translation scheme that improves the success rate of translating large-scale C code into compilable Rust code. In experiments with 20 benchmark C programs, including those exceeding 4 kilo lines of code, we successfully translated all programs into compilable Rust code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T17:52:36Z)
• VERT: Verified Equivalent Rust Transpilation with Large Language Models as Few-Shot Learners [6.824327908701066]
  Rust is a programming language that combines memory safety and low-level control, providing C-like performance. Existing work falls into two categories: rule-based and large language model (LLM)-based. We present VERT, a tool that can produce readable Rust transpilations with formal guarantees of correctness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T16:45:03Z)
• Enabling Memory Safety of C Programs using LLMs [5.297072277460838]
  Memory safety violations in low-level code, written in languages like C, continue to remain one of the major sources of software vulnerabilities. One method of removing such violations by construction is to port C code to a safe C dialect. Such dialects rely on programmer-supplied annotations to guarantee safety with minimal runtime overhead. This porting is a manual process that imposes significant burden on the programmer and hence, there has been limited adoption of this technique.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T13:05:54Z)
• FoC: Figure out the Cryptographic Functions in Stripped Binaries with LLMs [54.27040631527217]
  We propose a novel framework called FoC to Figure out the Cryptographic functions in stripped binaries. We first build a binary large language model (FoC-BinLLM) to summarize the semantics of cryptographic functions in natural language. We then build a binary code similarity model (FoC-Sim) upon the FoC-BinLLM to create change-sensitive representations and use it to retrieve similar implementations of unknown cryptographic functions in a database.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T09:45:33Z)
• Towards a Transpiler for C/C++ to Safer Rust [0.10993800728351737]
  Rust is a programming language developed by Mozilla that focuses on performance and safety. How to convert an existing C++ code base to Rust is also gaining greater attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T10:35:59Z)
• LILO: Learning Interpretable Libraries by Compressing and Documenting Code [71.55208585024198]
  We introduce LILO, a neurosymbolic framework that iteratively synthesizes, compresses, and documents code. LILO combines LLM-guided program synthesis with recent algorithmic advances in automated from Stitch. We find that AutoDoc boosts performance by helping LILO's synthesizer to interpret and deploy learned abstractions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T17:55:02Z)
• Guess & Sketch: Language Model Guided Transpilation [59.02147255276078]
  Learned transpilation offers an alternative to manual re-writing and engineering efforts. Probabilistic neural language models (LMs) produce plausible outputs for every input, but do so at the cost of guaranteed correctness. Guess & Sketch extracts alignment and confidence information from features of the LM then passes it to a symbolic solver to resolve semantic equivalence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T15:42:18Z)
• LEVER: Learning to Verify Language-to-Code Generation with Execution [64.36459105535]
  We propose LEVER, a simple approach to improve language-to-code generation by learning to verify the generated programs with their execution results. Specifically, we train verifiers to determine whether a program sampled from the LLMs is correct or not based on the natural language input, the program itself and its execution results. LEVER consistently improves over the base code LLMs(4.6% to 10.9% with code-davinci) and achieves new state-of-the-art results on all of them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T18:23:22Z)
• ReACC: A Retrieval-Augmented Code Completion Framework [53.49707123661763]
  We propose a retrieval-augmented code completion framework, leveraging both lexical copying and referring to code with similar semantics by retrieval. We evaluate our approach in the code completion task in Python and Java programming languages, achieving a state-of-the-art performance on CodeXGLUE benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T08:25:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.