Unveiling Uncertainty: A Deep Dive into Calibration and Performance of Multimodal Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14660v2
• Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 06:05:36 GMT
• Title: Unveiling Uncertainty: A Deep Dive into Calibration and Performance of Multimodal Large Language Models
• Authors: Zijun Chen, Wenbo Hu, Guande He, Zhijie Deng, Zheng Zhang, Richang Hong,
• Abstract summary: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) combine visual and textual data for tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering. This paper investigates representative MLLMs, focusing on their calibration across various scenarios. We observed miscalibration in their performance, and at the same time, no significant differences in calibration across these scenarios.
• Score: 36.81503322875839
• License:
• Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) combine visual and textual data for tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering. Proper uncertainty calibration is crucial, yet challenging, for reliable use in areas like healthcare and autonomous driving. This paper investigates representative MLLMs, focusing on their calibration across various scenarios, including before and after visual fine-tuning, as well as before and after multimodal training of the base LLMs. We observed miscalibration in their performance, and at the same time, no significant differences in calibration across these scenarios. We also highlight how uncertainty differs between text and images and how their integration affects overall uncertainty. To better understand MLLMs' miscalibration and their ability to self-assess uncertainty, we construct the IDK (I don't know) dataset, which is key to evaluating how they handle unknowns. Our findings reveal that MLLMs tend to give answers rather than admit uncertainty, but this self-assessment improves with proper prompt adjustments. Finally, to calibrate MLLMs and enhance model reliability, we propose techniques such as temperature scaling and iterative prompt optimization. Our results provide insights into improving MLLMs for effective and responsible deployment in multimodal applications. Code and IDK dataset: https://github.com/hfutml/Calibration-MLLM.

Related papers

• LLM-Lasso: A Robust Framework for Domain-Informed Feature Selection and Regularization [59.75242204923353]
  We introduce LLM-Lasso, a framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to guide feature selection in Lasso regression. LLMs generate penalty factors for each feature, which are converted into weights for the Lasso penalty using a simple, tunable model. Features identified as more relevant by the LLM receive lower penalties, increasing their likelihood of being retained in the final model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T02:55:22Z)
• Influences on LLM Calibration: A Study of Response Agreement, Loss Functions, and Prompt Styles [4.477423478591491]
  Calib-n is a novel framework that trains an auxiliary model for confidence estimation. We find that few-shot prompts are the most effective for auxiliary model-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T18:48:42Z)
• Toward Robust Hyper-Detailed Image Captioning: A Multiagent Approach and Dual Evaluation Metrics for Factuality and Coverage [50.84150600032693]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) excel at generating highly detailed captions but often produce hallucinations. We propose a multiagent approach that leverages LLM-MLLM collaboration to correct given captions. Our proposed method significantly enhances the factual accuracy of captions, even improving those generated by GPT-4V.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T01:37:22Z)
• LLaVA-KD: A Framework of Distilling Multimodal Large Language Models [70.19607283302712]
  We propose a novel framework to transfer knowledge from l-MLLM to s-MLLM. Specifically, we introduce Multimodal Distillation (MDist) to minimize the divergence between the visual-textual output distributions of l-MLLM and s-MLLM. We also propose a three-stage training scheme to fully exploit the potential of s-MLLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T17:41:28Z)
• Overconfidence is Key: Verbalized Uncertainty Evaluation in Large Language and Vision-Language Models [6.9060054915724]
  Language and Vision-Language Models (LLMs/VLMs) have revolutionized the field of AI by their ability to generate human-like text and understand images, but ensuring their reliability is crucial. This paper aims to evaluate the ability of LLMs (GPT4, GPT-3.5, LLaMA2, and PaLM 2) and VLMs (GPT4V and Gemini Pro Vision) to estimate their verbalized uncertainty via prompting. We propose the new Japanese Uncertain Scenes dataset aimed at testing VLM capabilities via difficult queries and object counting, and the Net Error dataset to measure direction of miscalibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-05T12:51:38Z)
• Fact-and-Reflection (FaR) Improves Confidence Calibration of Large Language Models [84.94220787791389]
  We propose Fact-and-Reflection (FaR) prompting, which improves the LLM calibration in two steps. Experiments show that FaR achieves significantly better calibration; it lowers the Expected Error by 23.5%. FaR even elicits the capability of verbally expressing concerns in less confident scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T01:37:23Z)
• Calibrating Large Language Models with Sample Consistency [76.23956851098598]
  We explore the potential of deriving confidence from the distribution of multiple randomly sampled model generations, via three measures of consistency. Results show that consistency-based calibration methods outperform existing post-hoc approaches. We offer practical guidance on choosing suitable consistency metrics for calibration, tailored to the characteristics of various LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T16:15:20Z)
• Thermometer: Towards Universal Calibration for Large Language Models [22.03852781949075]
  We propose OMETER, a calibration approach tailored to large language models (LLM) OMETER learns an auxiliary model, given data from multiple tasks, for calibrating a LLM. It is computationally efficient, preserves the accuracy of the LLM, and produces better-calibrated responses for new tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T04:13:48Z)
• An Empirical Study Into What Matters for Calibrating Vision-Language Models [43.46144923146323]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have emerged as the dominant approach for zero-shot recognition. In this study, we explore the calibration properties of VLMs across different architectures, datasets, and training strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T05:44:10Z)
• Open-Vocabulary Calibration for Fine-tuned CLIP [44.82453633696438]
  The confidence calibration problem in fine-tuned vision-language models (VLMs) could greatly reduce reliability when deploying such models in the real world. This paper bridges the gap by systematically investigating the confidence calibration problem in the context of prompt learning. We present a simple and effective approach called Distance-Aware (DAC), which is based on scaling the temperature using as guidance the distance between predicted text labels and base classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T08:42:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.