Inference Scaling vs Reasoning: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal LLM Problem-Solving

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16260v1
• Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:42:45 GMT
• Title: Inference Scaling vs Reasoning: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal LLM Problem-Solving
• Authors: Marwan AbdElhameed, Pavly Halim,
• Abstract summary: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have predominantly focused on maximizing accuracy and reasoning capabilities.<n>This paper investigates the potential synergy between reasoning enhancement and computational efficiency by analyzing the integration of two contrasting approaches.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have predominantly focused on maximizing accuracy and reasoning capabilities, often overlooking crucial computational efficiency considerations. While this approach has yielded impressive accuracy improvements, it has led to methods that may be impractical for real-world deployment due to computational overhead and latency constraints. This paper investigates the potential synergy between reasoning enhancement and computational efficiency by analyzing the integration of two contrasting approaches: Quiet-STaR (Self-Taught Reasoner) and REBASE (REward BAlanced SEarch). Through comprehensive empirical analysis using the Mistral-7B model on the GSM8K dataset, we demonstrate that while each method excels in its primary objective-Quiet-STaR achieving superior accuracy (32.03%) despite high computational cost (554.66s runtime, 12.73T FLOPs), and REBASE providing exceptional efficiency (8.47s runtime, 2.35T FLOPs) while maintaining baseline-comparable accuracy (10.94%)-their integration reveals fundamental challenges in reconciling reasoning depth with computational efficiency. The combined approach unexpectedly results in degraded performance (9.38% accuracy, 143.66s runtime), highlighting critical insights about the complex interplay between reasoning enhancement and efficiency optimization in LLMs. Our findings illuminate the need for novel architectures and algorithms specifically designed to bridge the gap between these competing objectives, while providing concrete directions for future research in compute-efficient reasoning methods.

Related papers

• Stochastic Subspace Descent Accelerated via Bi-fidelity Line Search [2.2940141855172036]
  This work introduces the bi-fidelity subspace descent (BF-SSD) algorithm, a novel zeroth-order optimization method. BF-SSD consistently achieves superior optimization performance while requiring significantly fewer high-fidelity evaluations. This study highlights the efficacy of integrating bi-fidelity within zeroth-order optimization, positioning BF-SSD as a promising and computationally efficient approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T20:17:35Z)
• Learning Adaptive Parallel Reasoning with Language Models [70.1745752819628]
  We propose Adaptive Parallel Reasoning (APR), a novel reasoning framework that enables language models to orchestrate both serialized and parallel computations end-to-end. APR generalizes existing reasoning methods by enabling adaptive multi-threaded inference using spawn() and join() operations. A key innovation is our end-to-end reinforcement learning strategy, optimizing both parent and child inference threads to enhance task success rate without requiring predefined reasoning structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T22:29:02Z)
• R-PRM: Reasoning-Driven Process Reward Modeling [53.06844294668382]
  Process Reward Models (PRMs) have emerged as a promising solution by evaluating each reasoning step. Existing PRMs typically output evaluation scores directly, limiting both learning efficiency and evaluation accuracy. We propose Reasoning-Driven Process Reward Modeling (R-PRM) R-PRM generates seed data from limited annotations, effectively bootstrapping our model's reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T09:23:08Z)
• Reward-Guided Speculative Decoding for Efficient LLM Reasoning [80.55186052123196]
  We introduce Reward-Guided Speculative Decoding (RSD), a novel framework aimed at improving the efficiency of inference in large language models (LLMs) RSD incorporates a controlled bias to prioritize high-reward outputs, in contrast to existing speculative decoding methods that enforce strict unbiasedness. RSD delivers significant efficiency gains against decoding with the target model only, while achieving significant better accuracy than parallel decoding method on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T17:19:57Z)
• Evaluating the effectiveness, reliability and efficiency of a multi-objective sequential optimization approach for building performance design [0.8168080812068832]
  This paper proposes and evaluates a sequential approach for multi-objective design optimization of building geometry, fabric, HVAC system and controls for building performance. The performance of the sequential approach is benchmarked against a full factorial search and compared to the NSGA-II algorithm. This research indicates that a sequential optimization approach is a highly efficient and robust alternative to the standard NSGA-II algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T08:00:00Z)
• Dspy-based Neural-Symbolic Pipeline to Enhance Spatial Reasoning in LLMs [29.735465300269993]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various tasks, yet they often struggle with spatial reasoning.<n>This paper presents a novel neural-symbolic framework that enhances LLMs' spatial reasoning abilities through iterative feedback between LLMs and Answer Set Programming (ASP)<n>We evaluate our approach on two benchmark datasets: StepGame and SparQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T18:04:05Z)
• Software Fault Localization Based on Multi-objective Feature Fusion and Deep Learning [1.6724380665811045]
  Software fault localization remains challenging due to limited feature diversity and low precision in traditional methods. This paper proposes a novel approach that integrates multi-objective optimization with deep learning models to improve both accuracy and efficiency in fault localization (FL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T04:37:32Z)
• The Role of Deductive and Inductive Reasoning in Large Language Models [37.430396755248104]
  We propose the Deductive and InDuctive(DID) method to enhance Large Language Models (LLMs) reasoning. DID implements a dual-metric complexity evaluation system that combines Littlestone dimension and information entropy. Our results demonstrate significant improvements in reasoning quality and solution accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T18:30:47Z)
• LLaMA-Berry: Pairwise Optimization for O1-like Olympiad-Level Mathematical Reasoning [56.273799410256075]
  The framework combines Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with iterative Self-Refine to optimize the reasoning path. The framework has been tested on general and advanced benchmarks, showing superior performance in terms of search efficiency and problem-solving capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T18:12:29Z)
• Derailer-Rerailer: Adaptive Verification for Efficient and Reliable Language Model Reasoning [11.765298236504155]
  Derailer-Rerailer is a novel framework that balances reasoning accuracy and computational efficiency. Our framework achieves significant accuracy improvements (8-11% across various reasoning tasks) while maintaining 2-3 times better efficiency than existing verification methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T21:20:17Z)
• Adaptive Layer Splitting for Wireless LLM Inference in Edge Computing: A Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Approach [18.153641696306707]
  This study introduces a framework taking inspiration from model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) to determine the optimal splitting point across the edge and user equipment (UE) By incorporating a reward surrogate model, our approach significantly reduces the computational cost of frequent performance evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T09:41:42Z)
• MindStar: Enhancing Math Reasoning in Pre-trained LLMs at Inference Time [51.5039731721706]
  MindStar is a purely inference-based searching method for large language models. It formulates reasoning tasks as searching problems and proposes two search ideas to identify the optimal reasoning paths. It significantly enhances the reasoning abilities of open-source models, such as Llama-2-13B and Mistral-7B, and achieves comparable performance to GPT-3.5 and Grok-1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T15:07:33Z)
• Attention is Naturally Sparse with Gaussian Distributed Input [8.602260591839318]
  This study presents a rigorous theoretical analysis of the sparsity in attention scores within Large Language Models (LLMs) Our main contribution lies in providing a detailed theoretical examination of how sparsity manifests in attention mechanisms, offering insights into the potential trade-offs between computational savings and model effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T12:37:34Z)
• Outlier-Robust Sparse Estimation via Non-Convex Optimization [73.18654719887205]
  We explore the connection between high-dimensional statistics and non-robust optimization in the presence of sparsity constraints. We develop novel and simple optimization formulations for these problems. As a corollary, we obtain that any first-order method that efficiently converges to station yields an efficient algorithm for these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-23T17:38:24Z)
• Combining Deep Learning and Optimization for Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow [94.24763814458686]
  Security-constrained optimal power flow (SCOPF) is fundamental in power systems. Modeling of APR within the SCOPF problem results in complex large-scale mixed-integer programs. This paper proposes a novel approach that combines deep learning and robust optimization techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T12:38:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.