Ethics and Technical Aspects of Generative AI Models in Digital Content Creation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16389v1
• Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 22:53:29 GMT
• Title: Ethics and Technical Aspects of Generative AI Models in Digital Content Creation
• Authors: Atahan Karagoz,
• Abstract summary: Generative AI models like GPT-4o and DALL-E 3 are reshaping digital content creation.<n>This paper examines both the capabilities and challenges of these models within creative industries.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI models like GPT-4o and DALL-E 3 are reshaping digital content creation, offering industries tools to generate diverse and sophisticated text and images with remarkable creativity and efficiency. This paper examines both the capabilities and challenges of these models within creative workflows. While they deliver high performance in generating content with creativity, diversity, and technical precision, they also raise significant ethical concerns. Our study addresses two key research questions: (a) how these models perform in terms of creativity, diversity, accuracy, and computational efficiency, and (b) the ethical risks they present, particularly concerning bias, authenticity, and potential misuse. Through a structured series of experiments, we analyze their technical performance and assess the ethical implications of their outputs, revealing that although generative models enhance creative processes, they often reflect biases from their training data and carry ethical vulnerabilities that require careful oversight. This research proposes ethical guidelines to support responsible AI integration into industry practices, fostering a balance between innovation and ethical integrity.

Related papers

• Probing and Inducing Combinational Creativity in Vision-Language Models [52.76981145923602]
  Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have sparked debate about whether their outputs reflect combinational creativity. We propose the Identification-Explanation-Implication (IEI) framework, which decomposes creative processes into three levels. To validate this framework, we curate CreativeMashup, a high-quality dataset of 666 artist-generated visual mashups annotated according to the IEI framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T17:38:18Z)
• Societal Impacts Research Requires Benchmarks for Creative Composition Tasks [10.67427286900562]
  This position paper argues that benchmarks focused on creative composition tasks is a necessary step towards understanding the societal harms of AI-generated content. We identify creative composition tasks as a prevalent usage category where users seek help with personal tasks that require everyday creativity. We call for greater transparency in usage patterns to inform the development of new benchmarks that can effectively measure both the progress and the impacts of models with creative capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T03:12:16Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
  We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment. We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z)
• Exploring AI Writers: Technology, Impact, and Future Prospects [0.8702432681310401]
  The research examines how AI tools are reshaping news production, particularly in fields such as finance, sports, and natural disasters. The findings reveal mixed perceptions among media students regarding the integration of AI into their profession, reflecting both optimism about efficiency gains and apprehensions over increased job market competition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T02:03:09Z)
• Towards a Practical Ethics of Generative AI in Creative Production Processes [0.0]
  This paper introduces a framework for addressing ethical challenges in creative production processes, such as the Double Diamond design model.<n>We draw on six major ethical theories - virtue ethics, deontology, utilitarianism, contract theory, care ethics, and existentialism.<n>We argue that by adopting a playful and exploratory approach to AI, designers can responsibly harness the potential of AI technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T11:07:26Z)
• Generative AI in Health Economics and Outcomes Research: A Taxonomy of Key Definitions and Emerging Applications, an ISPOR Working Group Report [12.204470166456561]
  Generative AI shows significant potential in health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) Generative AI shows significant potential in HEOR, enhancing efficiency, productivity, and offering novel solutions to complex challenges. Foundation models are promising in automating complex tasks, though challenges remain in scientific reliability, bias, interpretability, and workflow integration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T15:42:50Z)
• Ethical-Lens: Curbing Malicious Usages of Open-Source Text-to-Image Models [51.69735366140249]
  We introduce Ethical-Lens, a framework designed to facilitate the value-aligned usage of text-to-image tools. Ethical-Lens ensures value alignment in text-to-image models across toxicity and bias dimensions. Our experiments reveal that Ethical-Lens enhances alignment capabilities to levels comparable with or superior to commercial models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T11:38:25Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)
• Unpacking the Ethical Value Alignment in Big Models [46.560886177083084]
  This paper provides an overview of the risks and challenges associated with big models, surveys existing AI ethics guidelines, and examines the ethical implications arising from the limitations of these models. We introduce a novel conceptual paradigm for aligning the ethical values of big models and discuss promising research directions for alignment criteria, evaluation, and method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T16:45:40Z)
• Designing Participatory AI: Creative Professionals' Worries and Expectations about Generative AI [8.379286663107845]
  Generative AI, i.e., the group of technologies that automatically generate visual or written content based on text prompts, has undergone a leap in complexity and become widely available within just a few years. This paper presents the results of a qualitative survey investigating how creative professionals think about generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T20:57:03Z)
• On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models [256.61956234436553]
  We call these models foundation models to underscore their critically central yet incomplete character. This report provides a thorough account of the opportunities and risks of foundation models. To tackle these questions, we believe much of the critical research on foundation models will require deep interdisciplinary collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-16T17:50:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.