Find the Intention of Instruction: Comprehensive Evaluation of Instruction Understanding for Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19450v2
• Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:45:55 GMT
• Title: Find the Intention of Instruction: Comprehensive Evaluation of Instruction Understanding for Large Language Models
• Authors: Hyeonseok Moon, Jaehyung Seo, Seungyoon Lee, Chanjun Park, Heuiseok Lim,
• Abstract summary: One of the key strengths of Large Language Models (LLMs) is their ability to interact with humans by generating appropriate responses to given instructions. This ability, known as instruction-following capability, has established a foundation for the use of LLMs across various fields. We have noted that LLMs can become easily distracted by instruction-formatted statements, which may lead to an oversight of their instruction comprehension skills.
• Score: 8.020688053947547
• License:
• Abstract: One of the key strengths of Large Language Models (LLMs) is their ability to interact with humans by generating appropriate responses to given instructions. This ability, known as instruction-following capability, has established a foundation for the use of LLMs across various fields and serves as a crucial metric for evaluating their performance. While numerous evaluation benchmarks have been developed, most focus solely on clear and coherent instructions. However, we have noted that LLMs can become easily distracted by instruction-formatted statements, which may lead to an oversight of their instruction comprehension skills. To address this issue, we introduce the Intention of Instruction (IoInst) benchmark. This benchmark evaluates LLMs' capacity to remain focused and understand instructions without being misled by extraneous instructions. The primary objective of this benchmark is to identify the appropriate instruction that accurately guides the generation of a given context. Our findings suggest that even recently introduced state-of-the-art models still lack instruction understanding capability. Along with the proposition of IoInst in this study, we also present broad analyses of the several strategies potentially applicable to IoInst.

Related papers

• M-IFEval: Multilingual Instruction-Following Evaluation [2.624902795082451]
  The Instruction Following Evaluation (IFEval) benchmark from the literature does this using objective criteria. It only includes English instructions, limiting its ability to assess LLMs in other languages. We propose the Multilingual Instruction Following Evaluation (M-IFEval) benchmark, expanding the evaluation to French, Japanese, and Spanish, with both general and language-specific instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T06:27:04Z)
• The SIFo Benchmark: Investigating the Sequential Instruction Following Ability of Large Language Models [48.455388608863785]
  We introduce a benchmark designed to evaluate models' abilities to follow multiple instructions through sequential instruction following tasks. Our benchmark evaluates instruction following using four tasks (text modification, question answering, mathematics, and security rules) More recent and larger models significantly outperform their older and smaller counterparts on the SIFo tasks, validating the benchmark's effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T15:34:26Z)
• Evaluation of Instruction-Following Ability for Large Language Models on Story-Ending Generation [2.4889060833127665]
  In this paper, we focus on evaluating the instruction-following ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the context of story-ending generation. We propose an automatic evaluation pipeline that utilizes a machine reading comprehension (MRC) model to determine whether the generated story-ending reflects instruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T06:53:36Z)
• CoIN: A Benchmark of Continual Instruction tuNing for Multimodel Large Language Model [121.23360004498893]
  We present a benchmark, namely Continual Instruction tuNing (CoIN), to assess existing MLLMs in the sequential instruction tuning paradigm. Experiments on CoIN demonstrate that current powerful MLLMs still suffer catastrophic forgetting. We introduce MoELoRA to MLLMs which is effective to retain the previous instruction alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T08:54:31Z)
• Learning to Generate Explainable Stock Predictions using Self-Reflective Large Language Models [54.21695754082441]
  We propose a framework to teach Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate explainable stock predictions. A reflective agent learns how to explain past stock movements through self-reasoning, while the PPO trainer trains the model to generate the most likely explanations. Our framework can outperform both traditional deep-learning and LLM methods in prediction accuracy and Matthews correlation coefficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T03:18:58Z)
• FollowEval: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Assessing the Instruction-Following Capability of Large Language Models [42.72420855478716]
  FollowEval benchmark is composed of instances in both English and Chinese. Each test example is designed to evaluate more than one dimension. We have evaluated various LLMs using the FollowEval benchmark and found that their performance significantly lags behind that of humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T11:53:31Z)
• From Language Modeling to Instruction Following: Understanding the Behavior Shift in LLMs after Instruction Tuning [63.63840740526497]
  We investigate how instruction tuning adjusts pre-trained models with a focus on intrinsic changes. The impact of instruction tuning is then studied by comparing the explanations derived from the pre-trained and instruction-tuned models. Our findings reveal three significant impacts of instruction tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T21:16:05Z)
• Evaluating the Instruction-Following Robustness of Large Language Models to Prompt Injection [70.28425745910711]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional proficiency in instruction-following. This capability brings with it the risk of prompt injection attacks. We evaluate the robustness of instruction-following LLMs against such attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T06:21:50Z)
• Enhancing Large Language Models Against Inductive Instructions with Dual-critique Prompting [55.15697111170836]
  This paper reveals the behaviors of large language models (LLMs) towards textitinductive instructions and enhance their truthfulness and helpfulness accordingly. After extensive human and automatic evaluations, we uncovered a universal vulnerability among LLMs in processing inductive instructions. We identify that different inductive styles affect the models' ability to identify the same underlying errors, and the complexity of the underlying assumptions also influences the model's performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T06:38:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.