The SIFo Benchmark: Investigating the Sequential Instruction Following Ability of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.19999v2
• Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 13:02:11 GMT
• Title: The SIFo Benchmark: Investigating the Sequential Instruction Following Ability of Large Language Models
• Authors: Xinyi Chen, Baohao Liao, Jirui Qi, Panagiotis Eustratiadis, Christof Monz, Arianna Bisazza, Maarten de Rijke,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a benchmark designed to evaluate models' abilities to follow multiple instructions through sequential instruction following tasks. Our benchmark evaluates instruction following using four tasks (text modification, question answering, mathematics, and security rules) More recent and larger models significantly outperform their older and smaller counterparts on the SIFo tasks, validating the benchmark's effectiveness.
• Score: 48.455388608863785
• License:
• Abstract: Following multiple instructions is a crucial ability for large language models (LLMs). Evaluating this ability comes with significant challenges: (i) limited coherence between multiple instructions, (ii) positional bias where the order of instructions affects model performance, and (iii) a lack of objectively verifiable tasks. To address these issues, we introduce a benchmark designed to evaluate models' abilities to follow multiple instructions through sequential instruction following (SIFo) tasks. In SIFo, the successful completion of multiple instructions is verifiable by examining only the final instruction. Our benchmark evaluates instruction following using four tasks (text modification, question answering, mathematics, and security rules), each assessing different aspects of sequential instruction following. Our evaluation of popular LLMs, both closed-source and open-source, shows that more recent and larger models significantly outperform their older and smaller counterparts on the SIFo tasks, validating the benchmark's effectiveness. All models struggle with following sequences of instructions, hinting at an important lack of robustness of today's language models.

Related papers

• MIA-Bench: Towards Better Instruction Following Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs [47.94710556156627]
  MIA-Bench is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on their ability to strictly adhere to complex instructions. Our benchmark comprises a diverse set of 400 image-prompt pairs, each crafted to challenge the models' compliance with layered instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T17:53:35Z)
• CoIN: A Benchmark of Continual Instruction tuNing for Multimodel Large Language Model [121.23360004498893]
  We present a benchmark, namely Continual Instruction tuNing (CoIN), to assess existing MLLMs in the sequential instruction tuning paradigm. Experiments on CoIN demonstrate that current powerful MLLMs still suffer catastrophic forgetting. We introduce MoELoRA to MLLMs which is effective to retain the previous instruction alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T08:54:31Z)
• Towards Robust Instruction Tuning on Multimodal Large Language Models [25.506776502317436]
  In this work, we introduce an automatic instruction augmentation method named INSTRAUG in multimodal tasks. Results on two popular multimodal instructionfollowing benchmarks show that INSTRAUG can significantly improve the alignment of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) across 12 multimodal tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T12:35:50Z)
• FollowEval: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Assessing the Instruction-Following Capability of Large Language Models [42.72420855478716]
  FollowEval benchmark is composed of instances in both English and Chinese. Each test example is designed to evaluate more than one dimension. We have evaluated various LLMs using the FollowEval benchmark and found that their performance significantly lags behind that of humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T11:53:31Z)
• Instruction Position Matters in Sequence Generation with Large Language Models [67.87516654892343]
  Large language models (LLMs) are capable of performing conditional sequence generation tasks, such as translation or summarization. We propose enhancing the instruction-following capability of LLMs by shifting the position of task instructions after the input sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T12:36:57Z)
• MultiInstruct: Improving Multi-Modal Zero-Shot Learning via Instruction Tuning [24.741736629886564]
  Instruction tuning is a new learning paradigm that fine-tunes pre-trained language models on tasks specified through instructions. We introduce MUL-TIINSTRUCT, the first multimodal instruction tuning benchmark dataset. We show strong zero-shot performance on various unseen multimodal tasks and the benefit of transfer learning from a text-only instruction dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T05:17:06Z)
• CINS: Comprehensive Instruction for Few-shot Learning in Task-oriented Dialog Systems [56.302581679816775]
  This paper proposes Comprehensive Instruction (CINS) that exploits PLMs with task-specific instructions. We design a schema (definition, constraint, prompt) of instructions and their customized realizations for three important downstream tasks in ToD. Experiments are conducted on these ToD tasks in realistic few-shot learning scenarios with small validation data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-10T03:23:06Z)
• Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Little [74.49773960145681]
  A possible explanation for the impressive performance of masked language model (MLM)-training is that such models have learned to represent the syntactic structures prevalent in NLP pipelines. In this paper, we propose a different explanation: pre-trains succeed on downstream tasks almost entirely due to their ability to model higher-order word co-occurrence statistics. Our results show that purely distributional information largely explains the success of pre-training, and underscore the importance of curating challenging evaluation datasets that require deeper linguistic knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T06:30:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.