Blind Men and the Elephant: Diverse Perspectives on Gender Stereotypes in Benchmark Datasets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01168v2
• Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 10:03:47 GMT
• Title: Blind Men and the Elephant: Diverse Perspectives on Gender Stereotypes in Benchmark Datasets
• Authors: Mahdi Zakizadeh, Mohammad Taher Pilehvar,
• Abstract summary: This paper examines the inconsistencies between intrinsic stereotype benchmarks.<n>Using StereoSet and CrowS-Pairs as case studies, we investigated how data distribution affects benchmark results.
• Score: 12.798832545154271
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Accurately measuring gender stereotypical bias in language models is a complex task with many hidden aspects. Current benchmarks have underestimated this multifaceted challenge and failed to capture the full extent of the problem. This paper examines the inconsistencies between intrinsic stereotype benchmarks. We propose that currently available benchmarks each capture only partial facets of gender stereotypes, and when considered in isolation, they provide just a fragmented view of the broader landscape of bias in language models. Using StereoSet and CrowS-Pairs as case studies, we investigated how data distribution affects benchmark results. By applying a framework from social psychology to balance the data of these benchmarks across various components of gender stereotypes, we demonstrated that even simple balancing techniques can significantly improve the correlation between different measurement approaches. Our findings underscore the complexity of gender stereotyping in language models and point to new directions for developing more refined techniques to detect and reduce bias.

Related papers

• Bias in Gender Bias Benchmarks: How Spurious Features Distort Evaluation [116.86965910589775]
  We show that even minimal perturbations, such as masking just 10% of objects or weakly blurring backgrounds, can dramatically alter bias scores.<n>This suggests that current bias evaluations reflect model responses to spurious features rather than gender bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-09T11:14:11Z)
• Gender Encoding Patterns in Pretrained Language Model Representations [17.101242741559428]
  Gender bias in pretrained language models (PLMs) poses significant social and ethical challenges. This study adopts an information-theoretic approach to analyze how gender biases are encoded within various encoder-based architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T19:17:46Z)
• The Root Shapes the Fruit: On the Persistence of Gender-Exclusive Harms in Aligned Language Models [58.130894823145205]
  We center transgender, nonbinary, and other gender-diverse identities to investigate how alignment procedures interact with pre-existing gender-diverse bias. Our findings reveal that DPO-aligned models are particularly sensitive to supervised finetuning. We conclude with recommendations tailored to DPO and broader alignment practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T06:50:50Z)
• GenderCARE: A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing and Reducing Gender Bias in Large Language Models [73.23743278545321]
  Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities in natural language generation, but have also been observed to magnify societal biases.<n>GenderCARE is a comprehensive framework that encompasses innovative Criteria, bias Assessment, Reduction techniques, and Evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T15:35:46Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models to Measure Gender Representation Bias in Gendered Language Corpora [9.959039325564744]
  Large language models (LLMs) often inherit and amplify social biases embedded in their training data.<n>Gender bias is the association of specific roles or traits with a particular gender.<n>Gender representation bias is the unequal frequency of references to individuals of different genders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T16:30:58Z)
• Are Models Biased on Text without Gender-related Language? [14.931375031931386]
  We introduce UnStereoEval (USE), a novel framework for investigating gender bias in stereotype-free scenarios. USE defines a sentence-level score based on pretraining data statistics to determine if the sentence contain minimal word-gender associations. We find low fairness across all 28 tested models, suggesting that bias does not solely stem from the presence of gender-related words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T15:51:15Z)
• Locating and Mitigating Gender Bias in Large Language Models [40.78150878350479]
  Large language models (LLM) are pre-trained on extensive corpora to learn facts and human cognition which contain human preferences. This process can inadvertently lead to these models acquiring biases and prevalent stereotypes in society. We propose the LSDM (Least Square Debias Method), a knowledge-editing based method for mitigating gender bias in occupational pronouns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T13:57:43Z)
• Social Bias Probing: Fairness Benchmarking for Language Models [38.180696489079985]
  This paper proposes a novel framework for probing language models for social biases by assessing disparate treatment. We curate SoFa, a large-scale benchmark designed to address the limitations of existing fairness collections. We show that biases within language models are more nuanced than acknowledged, indicating a broader scope of encoded biases than previously recognized.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T16:35:59Z)
• VisoGender: A dataset for benchmarking gender bias in image-text pronoun resolution [80.57383975987676]
  VisoGender is a novel dataset for benchmarking gender bias in vision-language models. We focus on occupation-related biases within a hegemonic system of binary gender, inspired by Winograd and Winogender schemas. We benchmark several state-of-the-art vision-language models and find that they demonstrate bias in resolving binary gender in complex scenes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T17:59:51Z)
• Gender Bias in Transformer Models: A comprehensive survey [1.1011268090482573]
  Gender bias in artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a pressing concern with profound implications for individuals' lives. This paper presents a comprehensive survey that explores gender bias in Transformer models from a linguistic perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T11:40:47Z)
• Gender Biases in Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Image Captioning [87.15170977240643]
  We conduct a systematic study of gender biases in model-based evaluation metrics for image captioning tasks. We demonstrate the negative consequences of using these biased metrics, including the inability to differentiate between biased and unbiased generations. We present a simple and effective way to mitigate the metric bias without hurting the correlations with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T04:27:40Z)
• Counter-GAP: Counterfactual Bias Evaluation through Gendered Ambiguous Pronouns [53.62845317039185]
  Bias-measuring datasets play a critical role in detecting biased behavior of language models. We propose a novel method to collect diverse, natural, and minimally distant text pairs via counterfactual generation. We show that four pre-trained language models are significantly more inconsistent across different gender groups than within each group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T12:11:03Z)
• Choose Your Lenses: Flaws in Gender Bias Evaluation [29.16221451643288]
  We assess the current paradigm of gender bias evaluation and identify several flaws in it. First, we highlight the importance of extrinsic bias metrics that measure how a model's performance on some task is affected by gender. Second, we find that datasets and metrics are often coupled, and discuss how their coupling hinders the ability to obtain reliable conclusions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-20T17:59:55Z)
• Gender Stereotyping Impact in Facial Expression Recognition [1.5340540198612824]
  In recent years, machine learning-based models have become the most popular approach to Facial Expression Recognition (FER) In publicly available FER datasets, apparent gender representation is usually mostly balanced, but their representation in the individual label is not. We generate derivative datasets with different amounts of stereotypical bias by altering the gender proportions of certain labels. We observe a discrepancy in the recognition of certain emotions between genders of up to $29 %$ under the worst bias conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T10:52:23Z)
• The Birth of Bias: A case study on the evolution of gender bias in an English language model [1.6344851071810076]
  We use a relatively small language model, using the LSTM architecture trained on an English Wikipedia corpus. We find that the representation of gender is dynamic and identify different phases during training. We show that gender information is represented increasingly locally in the input embeddings of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T00:59:04Z)
• Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Models [107.82654101403264]
  Large-scale pretrained language models (LMs) can be potentially dangerous in manifesting undesirable representational biases. We propose steps towards mitigating social biases during text generation. Our empirical results and human evaluation demonstrate effectiveness in mitigating bias while retaining crucial contextual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T17:52:43Z)
• Multi-Dimensional Gender Bias Classification [67.65551687580552]
  Machine learning models can inadvertently learn socially undesirable patterns when training on gender biased text. We propose a general framework that decomposes gender bias in text along several pragmatic and semantic dimensions. Using this fine-grained framework, we automatically annotate eight large scale datasets with gender information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T21:23:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.