Long Context vs. RAG for LLMs: An Evaluation and Revisits

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01880v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 14:34:37 GMT
• Title: Long Context vs. RAG for LLMs: An Evaluation and Revisits
• Authors: Xinze Li, Yixin Cao, Yubo Ma, Aixin Sun,
• Abstract summary: This paper revisits recent studies on this topic, highlighting their key insights and discrepancies. We show that LC generally outperforms RAG in question-answering benchmarks, especially for Wikipedia-based questions. We also provide an in-depth discussion on this topic, highlighting the overlooked importance of context relevance in existing studies.
• Score: 41.27137478456755
• License:
• Abstract: Extending context windows (i.e., Long Context, LC) and using retrievers to selectively access relevant information (i.e., Retrieval-Augmented Generation, RAG) are the two main strategies to enable LLMs to incorporate extremely long external contexts. This paper revisits recent studies on this topic, highlighting their key insights and discrepancies. We then provide a more comprehensive evaluation by filtering out questions answerable without external context, identifying the most effective retrieval methods, and expanding the datasets. We show that LC generally outperforms RAG in question-answering benchmarks, especially for Wikipedia-based questions. Summarization-based retrieval performs comparably to LC, while chunk-based retrieval lags behind. However, RAG has advantages in dialogue-based and general question queries. These insights underscore the trade-offs between RAG and LC strategies, offering guidance for future optimization of LLMs with external knowledge sources. We also provide an in-depth discussion on this topic, highlighting the overlooked importance of context relevance in existing studies.

Related papers

• LaRA: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Long-Context LLMs - No Silver Bullet for LC or RAG Routing [70.35888047551643]
  We present LaRA, a novel benchmark specifically designed to rigorously compare RAG and LC LLMs. LaRA encompasses 2,326 test cases across four practical QA task categories and three types of naturally occurring long texts. We find that the optimal choice between RAG and LC depends on a complex interplay of factors, including the model's parameter size, long-text capabilities, context length, task type, and the characteristics of the retrieved chunks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T08:04:22Z)
• Don't Do RAG: When Cache-Augmented Generation is All You Need for Knowledge Tasks [11.053340674721005]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has gained traction as a powerful approach for enhancing language models by integrating external knowledge sources. This paper proposes an alternative paradigm, cache-augmented generation (CAG) that bypasses real-time retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T06:58:32Z)
• RAG-Star: Enhancing Deliberative Reasoning with Retrieval Augmented Verification and Refinement [85.08223786819532]
  Existing large language models (LLMs) show exceptional problem-solving capabilities but might struggle with complex reasoning tasks. We propose textbfRAG-Star, a novel RAG approach that integrates retrieved information to guide the tree-based deliberative reasoning process. Our experiments involving Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and GPT-4o demonstrate that RAG-Star significantly outperforms previous RAG and reasoning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T13:05:36Z)
• In Defense of RAG in the Era of Long-Context Language Models [17.397639724806364]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has been a reliable solution for context-based answer generation in the past. Recent studies show that long-context LLMs significantly outperform RAG in long-context applications. We propose an order-preserve retrieval-augmented generation (OP-RAG) mechanism, which significantly improves the performance of RAG for long-context question-answer applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T07:17:41Z)
• Improving Retrieval for RAG based Question Answering Models on Financial Documents [0.046603287532620746]
  This paper explores the existing constraints of RAG pipelines and introduces methodologies for enhancing text retrieval. It delves into strategies such as sophisticated chunking techniques, query expansion, the incorporation of metadata annotations, the application of re-ranking algorithms, and the fine-tuning of embedding algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-23T00:49:40Z)
• Unsupervised Information Refinement Training of Large Language Models for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [128.01050030936028]
  We propose an information refinement training method named InFO-RAG. InFO-RAG is low-cost and general across various tasks. It improves the performance of LLaMA2 by an average of 9.39% relative points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T08:24:38Z)
• CRUD-RAG: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models [49.16989035566899]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a technique that enhances the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge sources. This paper constructs a large-scale and more comprehensive benchmark, and evaluates all the components of RAG systems in various RAG application scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T14:25:32Z)
• Synergistic Interplay between Search and Large Language Models for Information Retrieval [141.18083677333848]
  InteR allows RMs to expand knowledge in queries using LLM-generated knowledge collections. InteR achieves overall superior zero-shot retrieval performance compared to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T11:58:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.