Layer-Level Self-Exposure and Patch: Affirmative Token Mitigation for Jailbreak Attack Defense
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.02629v1
- Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 19:06:03 GMT
- Title: Layer-Level Self-Exposure and Patch: Affirmative Token Mitigation for Jailbreak Attack Defense
- Authors: Yang Ouyang, Hengrui Gu, Shuhang Lin, Wenyue Hua, Jie Peng, Bhavya Kailkhura, Tianlong Chen, Kaixiong Zhou,
- Abstract summary: jailbreak attacks exploit vulnerabilities to elicit unintended or harmful outputs.<n>We introduce Layer-AdvPatcher, a novel methodology designed to defend against jailbreak attacks.<n>We conduct extensive experiments on two models, four benchmark datasets, and multiple state-of-the-art jailbreak benchmarks to demonstrate the efficacy of our approach.
- Score: 57.86886012610389
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in diverse applications, including chatbot assistants and code generation, aligning their behavior with safety and ethical standards has become paramount. However, jailbreak attacks, which exploit vulnerabilities to elicit unintended or harmful outputs, threaten LLMs' safety significantly. In this paper, we introduce Layer-AdvPatcher, a novel methodology designed to defend against jailbreak attacks by utilizing an unlearning strategy to patch specific layers within LLMs through self-augmented datasets. Our insight is that certain layer(s), tend to produce affirmative tokens when faced with harmful prompts. By identifying these layers and adversarially exposing them to generate more harmful data, one can understand their inherent and diverse vulnerabilities to attacks. With these exposures, we then "unlearn" these issues, reducing the impact of affirmative tokens and hence minimizing jailbreak risks while keeping the model's responses to safe queries intact. We conduct extensive experiments on two models, four benchmark datasets, and multiple state-of-the-art jailbreak benchmarks to demonstrate the efficacy of our approach. Results indicate that our framework reduces the harmfulness and attack success rate of jailbreak attacks without compromising utility for benign queries compared to recent defense methods.
Related papers
- DETAM: Defending LLMs Against Jailbreak Attacks via Targeted Attention Modification [18.006622965818856]
We introduce DETAM, a finetuning-free defense approach that improves the defensive capabilities against jailbreak attacks of LLMs.
Specifically, we analyze the differences in attention scores between successful and unsuccessful defenses to identify the attention heads sensitive to jailbreak attacks.
During inference, we reallocate attention to emphasize the user's core intention, minimizing interference from attack tokens.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-18T09:02:12Z) - Shaping the Safety Boundaries: Understanding and Defending Against Jailbreaks in Large Language Models [59.25318174362368]
Jailbreaking in Large Language Models (LLMs) is a major security concern as it can deceive LLMs to generate harmful text.<n>We conduct a detailed analysis of seven different jailbreak methods and find that disagreements stem from insufficient observation samples.<n>We propose a novel defense called textbfActivation Boundary Defense (ABD), which adaptively constrains the activations within the safety boundary.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-22T14:18:39Z) - Deciphering the Chaos: Enhancing Jailbreak Attacks via Adversarial Prompt Translation [71.92055093709924]
We propose a novel method that "translates" garbled adversarial prompts into coherent and human-readable natural language adversarial prompts.
It also offers a new approach to discovering effective designs for jailbreak prompts, advancing the understanding of jailbreak attacks.
Our method achieves over 90% attack success rates against Llama-2-Chat models on AdvBench, despite their outstanding resistance to jailbreak attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-15T06:31:04Z) - HSF: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks with Hidden State Filtering [14.031010511732008]
We propose a jailbreak attack defense strategy based on a Hidden State Filter (HSF)
HSF enables the model to preemptively identify and reject adversarial inputs before the inference process begins.
It significantly reduces the success rate of jailbreak attacks while minimally impacting responses to benign user queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-31T06:50:07Z) - EnJa: Ensemble Jailbreak on Large Language Models [69.13666224876408]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being deployed in safety-critical applications.
LLMs can still be jailbroken by carefully crafted malicious prompts, producing content that violates policy regulations.
We propose a novel EnJa attack to hide harmful instructions using prompt-level jailbreak, boost the attack success rate using a gradient-based attack, and connect the two types of jailbreak attacks via a template-based connector.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-07T07:46:08Z) - Virtual Context: Enhancing Jailbreak Attacks with Special Token Injection [54.05862550647966]
This paper introduces Virtual Context, which leverages special tokens, previously overlooked in LLM security, to improve jailbreak attacks.
Comprehensive evaluations show that Virtual Context-assisted jailbreak attacks can improve the success rates of four widely used jailbreak methods by approximately 40%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-28T11:35:54Z) - WildTeaming at Scale: From In-the-Wild Jailbreaks to (Adversarially) Safer Language Models [66.34505141027624]
We introduce WildTeaming, an automatic LLM safety red-teaming framework that mines in-the-wild user-chatbot interactions to discover 5.7K unique clusters of novel jailbreak tactics.
WildTeaming reveals previously unidentified vulnerabilities of frontier LLMs, resulting in up to 4.6x more diverse and successful adversarial attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-26T17:31:22Z) - Enhancing Jailbreak Attack Against Large Language Models through Silent Tokens [22.24239212756129]
Existing jailbreaking attacks require either human experts or leveraging complicated algorithms to craft prompts.
We introduce BOOST, a simple attack that leverages only the eos tokens.
Our findings uncover how fragile an LLM is against jailbreak attacks, motivating the development of strong safety alignment approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-31T07:41:03Z) - SafeDecoding: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware Decoding [35.750885132167504]
We introduce SafeDecoding, a safety-aware decoding strategy for large language models (LLMs) to generate helpful and harmless responses to user queries.
Our results show that SafeDecoding significantly reduces the attack success rate and harmfulness of jailbreak attacks without compromising the helpfulness of responses to benign user queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-14T06:54:31Z) - Comprehensive Assessment of Jailbreak Attacks Against LLMs [26.981225219312627]
We present the first large-scale measurement of various jailbreak attack methods.<n>We collect 17 cutting-edge jailbreak methods, summarize their features, and establish a novel jailbreak attack taxonomy.<n>Based on eight popular censored LLMs and 160 questions from 16 violation categories, we conduct a unified and impartial assessment of attack effectiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-08T13:42:50Z) - Weak-to-Strong Jailbreaking on Large Language Models [96.50953637783581]
Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks.
Existing jailbreaking methods are computationally costly.
We propose the weak-to-strong jailbreaking attack.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-30T18:48:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.