Are GNNs Actually Effective for Multimodal Fault Diagnosis in Microservice Systems?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.02766v2
• Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 09:51:12 GMT
• Title: Are GNNs Actually Effective for Multimodal Fault Diagnosis in Microservice Systems?
• Authors: Fei Gao, Ruyue Xin, Xiaocui Li, Yaqiang Zhang,
• Abstract summary: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are widely adopted for fault diagnosis in microservice systems, premised on their ability to model service dependencies.<n>To isolate the true value of GNNs, we propose DiagMLP, a deliberately minimal, topology-agnostic baseline.<n>DiagMLP achieves performance parity with state-of-the-art GNN-based methods in fault detection, localization, and classification.
• Score: 3.3601815104322377
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are widely adopted for fault diagnosis in microservice systems, premised on their ability to model service dependencies. However, the necessity of explicit graph structures remains underexamined, as existing evaluations conflate preprocessing with architectural contributions. To isolate the true value of GNNs, we propose DiagMLP, a deliberately minimal, topology-agnostic baseline that retains multimodal fusion capabilities while excluding graph modeling. Through ablation experiments across five datasets, DiagMLP achieves performance parity with state-of-the-art GNN-based methods in fault detection, localization, and classification. These findings challenge the prevailing assumption that graph structures are indispensable, revealing that: (i) preprocessing pipelines already encode critical dependency information, and (ii) GNN modules contribute marginally beyond multimodality fusion. Our work advocates for systematic re-evaluation of architectural complexity and highlights the need for standardized baseline protocols to validate model innovations.

Related papers

• Revisiting Graph Neural Networks on Graph-level Tasks: Comprehensive Experiments, Analysis, and Improvements [54.006506479865344]
  We propose a unified evaluation framework for graph-level Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) This framework provides a standardized setting to evaluate GNNs across diverse datasets. We also propose a novel GNN model with enhanced expressivity and generalization capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-01T08:48:53Z)
• Do graph neural network states contain graph properties? [5.222978725954348]
  We present a model explainability pipeline for Graph neural networks (GNNs) employing diagnostic classifiers. This pipeline aims to probe and interpret the learned representations in GNNs across various architectures and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T15:26:07Z)
• xAI-Drop: Don't Use What You Cannot Explain [23.33477769275026]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as the predominant paradigm for learning from graph-structured data. GNNs face challenges such as lack of generalization and poor interpretability. We introduce xAI-Drop, a novel topological-level dropping regularizer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T14:53:45Z)
• DFA-GNN: Forward Learning of Graph Neural Networks by Direct Feedback Alignment [57.62885438406724]
  Graph neural networks are recognized for their strong performance across various applications. BP has limitations that challenge its biological plausibility and affect the efficiency, scalability and parallelism of training neural networks for graph-based tasks. We propose DFA-GNN, a novel forward learning framework tailored for GNNs with a case study of semi-supervised learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T07:24:51Z)
• Online GNN Evaluation Under Test-time Graph Distribution Shifts [92.4376834462224]
  A new research problem, online GNN evaluation, aims to provide valuable insights into the well-trained GNNs's ability to generalize to real-world unlabeled graphs. We develop an effective learning behavior discrepancy score, dubbed LeBeD, to estimate the test-time generalization errors of well-trained GNN models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T01:28:08Z)
• Uncertainty in Graph Neural Networks: A Survey [50.63474656037679]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been extensively used in various real-world applications. However, the predictive uncertainty of GNNs stemming from diverse sources can lead to unstable and erroneous predictions. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the GNNs from the perspective of uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T21:54:52Z)
• Information Flow in Graph Neural Networks: A Clinical Triage Use Case [49.86931948849343]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have gained popularity in healthcare and other domains due to their ability to process multi-modal and multi-relational graphs. We investigate how the flow of embedding information within GNNs affects the prediction of links in Knowledge Graphs (KGs) Our results demonstrate that incorporating domain knowledge into the GNN connectivity leads to better performance than using the same connectivity as the KG or allowing unconstrained embedding propagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T09:18:12Z)
• Graph Neural Networks are Inherently Good Generalizers: Insights by Bridging GNNs and MLPs [71.93227401463199]
  This paper pinpoints the major source of GNNs' performance gain to their intrinsic capability, by introducing an intermediate model class dubbed as P(ropagational)MLP. We observe that PMLPs consistently perform on par with (or even exceed) their GNN counterparts, while being much more efficient in training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-18T08:17:32Z)
• Benchmarking Graph Neural Networks for FMRI analysis [0.0]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as a powerful tool to learn from graph-structured data. We study and evaluate the performance of five popular GNN architectures in diagnosing major depression disorder and autism spectrum disorder. We highlight that creating optimal graph structures for functional brain data is a major bottleneck hindering the performance of GNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T14:16:54Z)
• MGNNI: Multiscale Graph Neural Networks with Implicit Layers [53.75421430520501]
  implicit graph neural networks (GNNs) have been proposed to capture long-range dependencies in underlying graphs. We introduce and justify two weaknesses of implicit GNNs: the constrained expressiveness due to their limited effective range for capturing long-range dependencies, and their lack of ability to capture multiscale information on graphs at multiple resolutions. We propose a multiscale graph neural network with implicit layers (MGNNI) which is able to model multiscale structures on graphs and has an expanded effective range for capturing long-range dependencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T18:18:55Z)
• Relation Embedding based Graph Neural Networks for Handling Heterogeneous Graph [58.99478502486377]
  We propose a simple yet efficient framework to make the homogeneous GNNs have adequate ability to handle heterogeneous graphs. Specifically, we propose Relation Embedding based Graph Neural Networks (RE-GNNs), which employ only one parameter per relation to embed the importance of edge type relations and self-loop connections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-23T05:24:18Z)
• Comprehensive Graph Gradual Pruning for Sparse Training in Graph Neural Networks [52.566735716983956]
  We propose a graph gradual pruning framework termed CGP to dynamically prune GNNs. Unlike LTH-based methods, the proposed CGP approach requires no re-training, which significantly reduces the computation costs. Our proposed strategy greatly improves both training and inference efficiency while matching or even exceeding the accuracy of existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T14:23:31Z)
• EIGNN: Efficient Infinite-Depth Graph Neural Networks [51.97361378423152]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) are widely used for modelling graph-structured data in numerous applications. Motivated by this limitation, we propose a GNN model with infinite depth, which we call Efficient Infinite-Depth Graph Neural Networks (EIGNN) We show that EIGNN has a better ability to capture long-range dependencies than recent baselines, and consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-22T08:16:58Z)
• Graph neural network-based fault diagnosis: a review [14.252398721869294]
  Graph neural network (GNN)-based fault diagnosis (FD) has received increasing attention in recent years. The paper reviews neural network-based FD methods by focusing on their data representations, namely, time-series, images, and graphs. The most relevant fault diagnosis methods based on GNN are validated through the detailed experiments, and conclusions are made that the GNN-based methods can achieve good fault diagnosis performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-16T01:59:46Z)
• Amortized Probabilistic Detection of Communities in Graphs [39.56798207634738]
  We propose a simple framework for amortized community detection. We combine the expressive power of GNNs with recent methods for amortized clustering. We evaluate several models from our framework on synthetic and real datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-29T16:18:48Z)
• Graph Neural Networks for Leveraging Industrial Equipment Structure: An application to Remaining Useful Life Estimation [21.297461316329453]
  We propose to capture the structure of a complex equipment in the form of a graph, and use graph neural networks (GNNs) to model multi-sensor time-series data. We observe that the proposed GNN-based RUL estimation model compares favorably to several strong baselines from literature such as those based on RNNs and CNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-30T06:38:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.