A Novel Task-Driven Method with Evolvable Interactive Agents Using Event Trees for Enhanced Emergency Decision Support

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06193v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 04:53:46 GMT
• Title: A Novel Task-Driven Method with Evolvable Interactive Agents Using Event Trees for Enhanced Emergency Decision Support
• Authors: Xingyu Xiao, Peng Chen, Ben Qi, Jingang Liang, Jiejuan Tong, Haitao Wang,
• Abstract summary: Inadequate pre-established emergency plans can lead operators to become overwhelmed during complex systems malfunctions.<n>This study addresses the urgent need for agile decision-making in response to various unforeseen incidents through a novel approach.<n>EvoTaskTree is a task-driven method with evolvable interactive agents using event trees for emergency decision support.
• Score: 2.50572897318757
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As climate change and other global challenges increase the likelihood of unforeseen emergencies, the limitations of human-driven strategies in critical situations become more pronounced. Inadequate pre-established emergency plans can lead operators to become overwhelmed during complex systems malfunctions. This study addresses the urgent need for agile decision-making in response to various unforeseen incidents through a novel approach, EvoTaskTree (a task-driven method with evolvable interactive agents using event trees for emergency decision support). This advanced approach integrates two types of agents powered by large language models (LLMs): task executors, responsible for executing critical procedures, and task validators, ensuring the efficacy of those actions. By leveraging insights from event tree analysis, our framework encompasses three crucial tasks: initiating event subevent analysis, event tree header event analysis, and decision recommendations. The agents learn from both successful and unsuccessful responses from these tasks. Finally, we use nuclear power plants as a demonstration of a safety-critical system. Our findings indicate that the designed agents are not only effective but also outperform existing approaches, achieving an impressive accuracy rate of up to 100 % in processing previously unencoun32 tered incident scenarios. This paper demonstrates that EvoTaskTree significantly enhances the rapid formulation of emergency decision-making.

Related papers

• A Desideratum for Conversational Agents: Capabilities, Challenges, and Future Directions [51.96890647837277]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have propelled conversational AI from traditional dialogue systems into sophisticated agents capable of autonomous actions, contextual awareness, and multi-turn interactions with users. This survey paper presents a desideratum for next-generation Conversational Agents - what has been achieved, what challenges persist, and what must be done for more scalable systems that approach human-level intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T21:01:25Z)
• Factorized Deep Q-Network for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in Victim Tagging [1.3435319774513577]
  We present a mathematical formulation of multi-agent victim tagging to minimize the time it takes for responders to tag all victims. We investigate the performance of a multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) strategy, factorized deep Q-network (FDQN) to minimize victim tagging time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T01:32:09Z)
• Divide-and-Conquer: Tree-structured Strategy with Answer Distribution Estimator for Goal-Oriented Visual Dialogue [30.126882554391837]
  Tree-Structured Strategy with Answer Distribution Estimator (TSADE) We propose a Tree-Structured Strategy with Answer Distribution Estimator (TSADE) which guides the question generation by excluding half of the current candidate objects in each round. We experimentally demonstrate that our method can enable the agents to achieve high task-oriented accuracy with fewer repeating questions and rounds compared to traditional ergodic question generation approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T08:16:09Z)
• Agent-Oriented Planning in Multi-Agent Systems [54.429028104022066]
  We propose a novel framework for agent-oriented planning in multi-agent systems, leveraging a fast task decomposition and allocation process. We integrate a feedback loop into the proposed framework to further enhance the effectiveness and robustness of such a problem-solving process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T04:07:51Z)
• DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents [49.74065769505137]
  We introduce DISCOVERYWORLD, the first virtual environment for developing and benchmarking an agent's ability to perform complete cycles of novel scientific discovery. It includes 120 different challenge tasks spanning eight topics each with three levels of difficulty and several parametric variations. We find that strong baseline agents, that perform well in prior published environments, struggle on most DISCOVERYWORLD tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T20:08:44Z)
• Adaptive In-conversation Team Building for Language Model Agents [33.03550687362213]
  Leveraging multiple large language model (LLM) agents has shown to be a promising approach for tackling complex tasks. Our new adaptive team-building paradigm offers a flexible solution, realized through a novel agent design named Captain Agent. A comprehensive evaluation across six real-world scenarios demonstrates that Captain Agent significantly outperforms existing multi-agent methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T18:08:37Z)
• Devil's Advocate: Anticipatory Reflection for LLM Agents [53.897557605550325]
  Our approach prompts LLM agents to decompose a given task into manageable subtasks. We implement a three-fold introspective intervention:. Anticipatory reflection on potential failures and alternative remedy before action execution. Post-action alignment with subtask objectives and backtracking with remedy to ensure utmost effort in plan execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T19:20:15Z)
• WESE: Weak Exploration to Strong Exploitation for LLM Agents [95.6720931773781]
  This paper proposes a novel approach, Weak Exploration to Strong Exploitation (WESE) to enhance LLM agents in solving open-world interactive tasks. WESE involves decoupling the exploration and exploitation process, employing a cost-effective weak agent to perform exploration tasks for global knowledge. A knowledge graph-based strategy is then introduced to store the acquired knowledge and extract task-relevant knowledge, enhancing the stronger agent in success rate and efficiency for the exploitation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T03:31:54Z)
• HAZARD Challenge: Embodied Decision Making in Dynamically Changing Environments [93.94020724735199]
  HAZARD consists of three unexpected disaster scenarios, including fire, flood, and wind. This benchmark enables us to evaluate autonomous agents' decision-making capabilities across various pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T18:59:43Z)
• Enhancing Evacuation Planning through Multi-Agent Simulation and Artificial Intelligence: Understanding Human Behavior in Hazardous Environments [0.0]
  The paper employs Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques, specifically Multi-Agent Systems (MAS), to construct a simulation model for evacuation. The primary objective of this paper is to enhance our comprehension of how individuals react and respond during such distressing situations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-11T08:13:42Z)
• Learning to Generate All Feasible Actions [4.333208181196761]
  We introduce action mapping, a novel approach that divides the learning process into two steps: first learn feasibility and subsequently, the objective. This paper focuses on the feasibility part by learning to generate all feasible actions through self-supervised querying of the feasibility model. We demonstrate the agent's proficiency in generating actions across disconnected feasible action sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T23:15:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.