Integrators at War: Mediating in AI-assisted Resort-to-Force Decisions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06861v1
• Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:21:33 GMT
• Title: Integrators at War: Mediating in AI-assisted Resort-to-Force Decisions
• Authors: Dennis Müller, Maurice Chiodo, Mitja Sienknecht,
• Abstract summary: The integration of AI systems into the military domain is changing the way war-related decisions are made.<n>It binds together three disparate groups of actors - developers, users - and creates a relationship between these groups and the machine.
• Score: 2.5602836891933074
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The integration of AI systems into the military domain is changing the way war-related decisions are made. It binds together three disparate groups of actors - developers, integrators, users - and creates a relationship between these groups and the machine, embedded in the (pre-)existing organisational and system structures. In this article, we focus on the important, but often neglected, group of integrators within such a sociotechnical system. In complex human-machine configurations, integrators carry responsibility for linking the disparate groups of developers and users in the political and military system. To act as the mediating group requires a deep understanding of the other groups' activities, perspectives and norms. We thus ask which challenges and shortcomings emerge from integrating AI systems into resort-to-force (RTF) decision-making processes, and how to address them. To answer this, we proceed in three steps. First, we conceptualise the relationship between different groups of actors and AI systems as a sociotechnical system. Second, we identify challenges within such systems for human-machine teaming in RTF decisions. We focus on challenges that arise a) from the technology itself, b) from the integrators' role in the sociotechnical system, c) from the human-machine interaction. Third, we provide policy recommendations to address these shortcomings when integrating AI systems into RTF decision-making structures.

Related papers

• Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents [109.13815627467514]
  The emergence of AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) marks a pivotal shift toward the Agentic Web.<n>In this paradigm, agents interact directly with one another to plan, coordinate, and execute complex tasks on behalf of users.<n>We present a structured framework for understanding and building the Agentic Web.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:58:12Z)
• When Autonomy Goes Rogue: Preparing for Risks of Multi-Agent Collusion in Social Systems [78.04679174291329]
  We introduce a proof-of-concept to simulate the risks of malicious multi-agent systems (MAS)<n>We apply this framework to two high-risk fields: misinformation spread and e-commerce fraud.<n>Our findings show that decentralized systems are more effective at carrying out malicious actions than centralized ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-19T15:17:30Z)
• Red Teaming AI Red Teaming [9.942581294959107]
  We argue that there exists a significant gap between red teaming's original intent and its narrow focus on discovering model-level flaws in the context of generative AI.<n>We propose a comprehensive framework operationalizing red teaming in AI systems at two levels: macro-level system red teaming and micro-level model red teaming.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T23:23:40Z)
• Amplifying Human Creativity and Problem Solving with AI Through Generative Collective Intelligence [3.160501875040035]
  We propose a general framework for human-AI collaboration that amplifies the capabilities of both types of intelligence.<n>We refer to this as Generative Collective Intelligence (GCI)<n>GCI employs AI in dual roles: as interactive agents and as technology that accumulates, organizes, and leverages knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T14:33:49Z)
• Advances and Challenges in Foundation Agents: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Evolutionary, Collaborative, and Safe Systems [132.77459963706437]
  This book provides a comprehensive overview, framing intelligent agents within modular, brain-inspired architectures.<n>It explores self-enhancement and adaptive evolution mechanisms, exploring how agents autonomously refine their capabilities.<n>It also examines the collective intelligence emerging from agent interactions, cooperation, and societal structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T18:00:29Z)
• Alignment, Agency and Autonomy in Frontier AI: A Systems Engineering Perspective [0.0]
  Concepts of alignment, agency, and autonomy have become central to AI safety, governance, and control. This paper traces the historical, philosophical, and technical evolution of these concepts, emphasizing how their definitions influence AI development, deployment, and oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T21:37:20Z)
• Position: Emergent Machina Sapiens Urge Rethinking Multi-Agent Paradigms [6.285314639722078]
  We argue that AI agents should be empowered to dynamically adjust their objectives. We call for a shift toward the emergent, self-organizing, and context-aware nature of these systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T22:20:15Z)
• On the ETHOS of AI Agents: An Ethical Technology and Holistic Oversight System [0.0]
  ETHOS is a decentralized global registry for AI agents.<n>System incorporates the concept of AI specific legal entities.<n>System emphasizes the need for a collaborative, participatory approach to AI governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-22T18:01:49Z)
• Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
  We argue that shortcomings stem from one overarching failure: AI systems lack wisdom. While AI research has focused on task-level strategies, metacognition is underdeveloped in AI systems. We propose that integrating metacognitive capabilities into AI systems is crucial for enhancing their robustness, explainability, cooperation, and safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z)
• The Switch, the Ladder, and the Matrix: Models for Classifying AI Systems [0.0]
  There still exists a gap between principles and practices in AI ethics. One major obstacle organisations face when attempting to operationalise AI Ethics is the lack of a well-defined material scope.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T12:16:01Z)
• Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
  We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks. We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering. In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• Human-AI Coevolution [48.74579595505374]
  Coevolution AI is a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other. This paper introduces Coevolution AI as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T18:10:54Z)
• On the Philosophical, Cognitive and Mathematical Foundations of Symbiotic Autonomous Systems (SAS) [87.3520234553785]
  Symbiotic Autonomous Systems (SAS) are advanced intelligent and cognitive systems exhibiting autonomous collective intelligence. This work presents a theoretical framework of SAS underpinned by the latest advances in intelligence, cognition, computer, and system sciences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T05:44:25Z)
• Towards an Interface Description Template for AI-enabled Systems [77.34726150561087]
  Reuse is a common system architecture approach that seeks to instantiate a system architecture with existing components. There is currently no framework that guides the selection of necessary information to assess their portability to operate in a system different than the one for which the component was originally purposed. We present ongoing work on establishing an interface description template that captures the main information of an AI-enabled component.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-13T20:30:26Z)
• Distributed and Democratized Learning: Philosophy and Research Challenges [80.39805582015133]
  We propose a novel design philosophy called democratized learning (Dem-AI) Inspired by the societal groups of humans, the specialized groups of learning agents in the proposed Dem-AI system are self-organized in a hierarchical structure to collectively perform learning tasks more efficiently. We present a reference design as a guideline to realize future Dem-AI systems, inspired by various interdisciplinary fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-18T08:45:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.