Multimodal LLMs Can Reason about Aesthetics in Zero-Shot

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09012v3
• Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2025 09:03:17 GMT
• Title: Multimodal LLMs Can Reason about Aesthetics in Zero-Shot
• Authors: Ruixiang Jiang, Changwen Chen,
• Abstract summary: This paper investigates how the reasoning capabilities of Multimodal LLMs can be effectively elicited to perform aesthetic judgment.<n>We show that MLLMs exhibit a tendency towards hallucinations during aesthetic reasoning, characterized by subjective opinions and unsubstantiated artistic interpretations.<n> MLLMs prompted by this principle produce multifaceted, in-depth aesthetic reasoning that aligns significantly better with human judgment.
• Score: 35.59051707152096
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The rapid technical progress of generative art (GenArt) has democratized the creation of visually appealing imagery. However, achieving genuine artistic impact - the kind that resonates with viewers on a deeper, more meaningful level - remains formidable as it requires a sophisticated aesthetic sensibility. This sensibility involves a multifaceted cognitive process extending beyond mere visual appeal, which is often overlooked by current computational methods. This paper pioneers an approach to capture this complex process by investigating how the reasoning capabilities of Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) can be effectively elicited to perform aesthetic judgment. Our analysis reveals a critical challenge: MLLMs exhibit a tendency towards hallucinations during aesthetic reasoning, characterized by subjective opinions and unsubstantiated artistic interpretations. We further demonstrate that these hallucinations can be suppressed by employing an evidence-based and objective reasoning process, as substantiated by our proposed baseline, ArtCoT. MLLMs prompted by this principle produce multifaceted, in-depth aesthetic reasoning that aligns significantly better with human judgment. These findings have direct applications in areas such as AI art tutoring and as reward models for image generation. Ultimately, we hope this work paves the way for AI systems that can truly understand, appreciate, and contribute to art that aligns with human aesthetic values. Project homepage: https://github.com/songrise/MLLM4Art.

Related papers

• MentisOculi: Revealing the Limits of Reasoning with Mental Imagery [63.285794947638614]
  We develop MentisOculi, a suite of multi-step reasoning problems amenable to visual solution.<n> evaluating visual strategies ranging from latent tokens to explicit generated imagery, we find they generally fail to improve performance.<n>Our findings suggest that despite their inherent appeal, visual thoughts do not yet benefit model reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T18:49:06Z)
• Toward Cognitive Supersensing in Multimodal Large Language Model [67.15559571626747]
  We introduce Cognitive Supersensing, a training paradigm that endows MLLMs with human-like visual imagery capabilities.<n>In experiments, MLLMs trained with Cognitive Supersensing significantly outperform state-of-the-art baselines on CogSense-Bench.<n>We will open-source the CogSense-Bench and our model weights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T02:19:50Z)
• From Pixels to Feelings: Aligning MLLMs with Human Cognitive Perception of Images [36.44183173680125]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are adept at answering what is in an image-identifying objects but often lack the ability to understand how an image feels to a human observer.<n>This gap is most evident when considering subjective cognitive properties, such as what makes an image memorable, funny, aesthetically pleasing, or emotionally evocative.<n>We introduce CogIP-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating MLLMs on such image cognitive properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T23:30:24Z)
• Reinforcing Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models with Interwoven Thinking and Visual Drawing [62.447497430479174]
  Drawing to reason in space is a novel paradigm that enables LVLMs to reason through elementary drawing operations in the visual space.<n>Our model, named VILASR, consistently outperforms existing methods across diverse spatial reasoning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T17:41:50Z)
• Does CLIP perceive art the same way we do? [0.0]
  We investigate CLIP's ability to extract high-level semantic and stylistic information from paintings.<n>Our findings reveal both strengths and limitations in CLIP's visual representations.<n>Our work highlights the need for deeper interpretability in multimodal systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T13:21:10Z)
• Assessing LLMs in Art Contexts: Critique Generation and Theory of Mind Evaluation [0.3359875577705537]
  This study explores how large language models (LLMs) perform in two areas related to art.<n>For the critique generation part, we built a system that combines Noel Carroll's evaluative framework with a broad selection of art criticism theories.<n>These critiques were compared with those written by human experts in a Turing test-style evaluation.<n>In the second part, we introduced new simple ToM tasks based on situations involving interpretation, emotion, and moral tension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T10:10:25Z)
• Compose Your Aesthetics: Empowering Text-to-Image Models with the Principles of Art [61.28133495240179]
  We propose a novel task of aesthetics alignment which seeks to align user-specified aesthetics with the T2I generation output. Inspired by how artworks provide an invaluable perspective to approach aesthetics, we codify visual aesthetics using the compositional framework artists employ. We demonstrate that T2I DMs can effectively offer 10 compositional controls through user-specified PoA conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-15T06:58:09Z)
• CognArtive: Large Language Models for Automating Art Analysis and Decoding Aesthetic Elements [1.0579965347526206]
  Art, as a universal language, can be interpreted in diverse ways. Large Language Models (LLMs) and the availability of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) raise the question of how these models can be used to assess and interpret artworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T18:08:23Z)
• A Cognitive Paradigm Approach to Probe the Perception-Reasoning Interface in VLMs [3.2228025627337864]
  This paper introduces a structured evaluation framework using Bongard Problems (BPs) to dissect the perception-reasoning interface in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) We propose three distinct evaluation paradigms, mirroring human problem-solving strategies. Our framework provides a valuable diagnostic tool, highlighting the need to enhance visual processing fidelity for achieving more robust and human-like visual intelligence in AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T12:42:42Z)
• Imagine while Reasoning in Space: Multimodal Visualization-of-Thought [70.74453180101365]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has proven highly effective for enhancing complex reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) We propose a new reasoning paradigm, Multimodal Visualization-of-Thought (MVoT) It enables visual thinking in MLLMs by generating image visualizations of their reasoning traces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-13T18:23:57Z)
• Advancing Comprehensive Aesthetic Insight with Multi-Scale Text-Guided Self-Supervised Learning [14.405750888492735]
  Image Aesthetic Assessment (IAA) is a vital and intricate task that entails analyzing and assessing an image's aesthetic values. Traditional methods of IAA often concentrate on a single aesthetic task and suffer from inadequate labeled datasets. We propose a comprehensive aesthetic MLLM capable of nuanced aesthetic insight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T16:35:35Z)
• MC-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Context Visual Grounding in the Era of MLLMs [61.56904387052982]
  This paper proposes a new visual grounding task called multi-context visual grounding. It aims to localize instances of interest across multiple images based on open-ended text prompts. We benchmark over 20 state-of-the-art MLLMs and foundation models with potential multi-context visual grounding capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T07:52:57Z)
• Diffusion-Based Visual Art Creation: A Survey and New Perspectives [51.522935314070416]
  This survey explores the emerging realm of diffusion-based visual art creation, examining its development from both artistic and technical perspectives. Our findings reveal how artistic requirements are transformed into technical challenges and highlight the design and application of diffusion-based methods within visual art creation. We aim to shed light on the mechanisms through which AI systems emulate and possibly, enhance human capacities in artistic perception and creativity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T04:49:50Z)
• Visualization Literacy of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comparative Study [12.367399155606162]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) combine the inherent power of large language models (LLMs) with the renewed capabilities to reason about the multimodal context. Many recent works in visualization have demonstrated MLLMs' capability to understand and interpret visualization results and explain the content of the visualization to users in natural language. In this work, we aim to fill the gap by utilizing the concept of visualization literacy to evaluate MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T17:52:16Z)
• Aligning Vision Models with Human Aesthetics in Retrieval: Benchmarks and Algorithms [91.19304518033144]
  We aim to align vision models with human aesthetic standards in a retrieval system. We propose a preference-based reinforcement learning method that fine-tunes the vision models to better align the vision models with human aesthetics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T17:59:20Z)
• AesExpert: Towards Multi-modality Foundation Model for Image Aesthetics Perception [74.11069437400398]
  We develop a corpus-rich aesthetic critique database with 21,904 diverse-sourced images and 88K human natural language feedbacks. We fine-tune the open-sourced general foundation models, achieving multi-modality Aesthetic Expert models, dubbed AesExpert. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed AesExpert models deliver significantly better aesthetic perception performances than the state-of-the-art MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T09:56:20Z)
• AesBench: An Expert Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models on Image Aesthetics Perception [64.25808552299905]
  AesBench is an expert benchmark aiming to comprehensively evaluate the aesthetic perception capacities of MLLMs. We construct an Expert-labeled Aesthetics Perception Database (EAPD), which features diversified image contents and high-quality annotations provided by professional aesthetic experts. We propose a set of integrative criteria to measure the aesthetic perception abilities of MLLMs from four perspectives, including Perception (AesP), Empathy (AesE), Assessment (AesA) and Interpretation (AesI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T10:58:07Z)
• Impressions: Understanding Visual Semiotics and Aesthetic Impact [66.40617566253404]
  We present Impressions, a novel dataset through which to investigate the semiotics of images. We show that existing multimodal image captioning and conditional generation models struggle to simulate plausible human responses to images. This dataset significantly improves their ability to model impressions and aesthetic evaluations of images through fine-tuning and few-shot adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T04:30:18Z)
• A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models [71.63375558033364]
  Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) represented by GPT-4V has been a new rising research hotspot.<n>This paper aims to trace and summarize the recent progress of MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T15:21:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.