Multilingual LLMs Struggle to Link Orthography and Semantics in Bilingual Word Processing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09127v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 20:22:35 GMT
• Title: Multilingual LLMs Struggle to Link Orthography and Semantics in Bilingual Word Processing
• Authors: Eshaan Tanwar, Gayatri Oke, Tanmoy Chakraborty,
• Abstract summary: This study focuses on English-Spanish, English-French, and English-German cognates, non-cognate, and interlingual homographs. We evaluate how multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs) handle such phenomena, focusing on English-Spanish, English-French, and English-German cognates, non-cognate, and interlingual homographs. We find models to opt for different strategies in understanding English and non-English homographs, highlighting a lack of a unified approach to handling cross-lingual ambiguities.
• Score: 19.6191088446367
• License:
• Abstract: Bilingual lexical processing is shaped by the complex interplay of phonological, orthographic, and semantic features of two languages within an integrated mental lexicon. In humans, this is evident in the ease with which cognate words - words similar in both orthographic form and meaning (e.g., blind, meaning "sightless" in both English and German) - are processed, compared to the challenges posed by interlingual homographs, which share orthographic form but differ in meaning (e.g., gift, meaning "present" in English but "poison" in German). We investigate how multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs) handle such phenomena, focusing on English-Spanish, English-French, and English-German cognates, non-cognate, and interlingual homographs. Specifically, we evaluate their ability to disambiguate meanings and make semantic judgments, both when these word types are presented in isolation or within sentence contexts. Our findings reveal that while certain LLMs demonstrate strong performance in recognizing cognates and non-cognates in isolation, they exhibit significant difficulty in disambiguating interlingual homographs, often performing below random baselines. This suggests LLMs tend to rely heavily on orthographic similarities rather than semantic understanding when interpreting interlingual homographs. Further, we find LLMs exhibit difficulty in retrieving word meanings, with performance in isolative disambiguation tasks having no correlation with semantic understanding. Finally, we study how the LLM processes interlingual homographs in incongruent sentences. We find models to opt for different strategies in understanding English and non-English homographs, highlighting a lack of a unified approach to handling cross-lingual ambiguities.

Related papers

• Thank You, Stingray: Multilingual Large Language Models Can Not (Yet) Disambiguate Cross-Lingual Word Sense [30.62699081329474]
  We introduce a novel benchmark for cross-lingual sense disambiguation, StingrayBench. We collect false friends in four language pairs, namely Indonesian-Malay, Indonesian-Tagalog, Chinese-Japanese, and English-German. In our analysis of various models, we observe they tend to be biased toward higher-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T22:09:43Z)
• Linguistic Minimal Pairs Elicit Linguistic Similarity in Large Language Models [15.857451401890092]
  We leverage linguistic minimal pairs to probe internal linguistic representations of Large Language Models (LLMs) Our large-scale experiments, spanning 100+ LLMs and 150k minimal pairs in three languages, reveal properties of linguistic similarity from four key aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T03:29:40Z)
• Evaluating Contextualized Representations of (Spanish) Ambiguous Words: A New Lexical Resource and Empirical Analysis [2.2530496464901106]
  We evaluate semantic representations of Spanish ambiguous nouns in context in a suite of Spanish-language monolingual and multilingual BERT-based models. We find that various BERT-based LMs' contextualized semantic representations capture some variance in human judgments but fall short of the human benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T18:58:11Z)
• We're Afraid Language Models Aren't Modeling Ambiguity [136.8068419824318]
  Managing ambiguity is a key part of human language understanding. We characterize ambiguity in a sentence by its effect on entailment relations with another sentence. We show that a multilabel NLI model can flag political claims in the wild that are misleading due to ambiguity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-27T17:57:58Z)
• Cross-Linguistic Syntactic Difference in Multilingual BERT: How Good is It and How Does It Affect Transfer? [50.48082721476612]
  Multilingual BERT (mBERT) has demonstrated considerable cross-lingual syntactic ability. We investigate the distributions of grammatical relations induced from mBERT in the context of 24 typologically different languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T09:44:08Z)
• Cross-Lingual Ability of Multilingual Masked Language Models: A Study of Language Structure [54.01613740115601]
  We study three language properties: constituent order, composition and word co-occurrence. Our main conclusion is that the contribution of constituent order and word co-occurrence is limited, while the composition is more crucial to the success of cross-linguistic transfer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T07:09:35Z)
• Does Transliteration Help Multilingual Language Modeling? [0.0]
  We empirically measure the effect of transliteration on Multilingual Language Models. We focus on the Indic languages, which have the highest script diversity in the world. We find that transliteration benefits the low-resource languages without negatively affecting the comparatively high-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-29T05:48:42Z)
• AM2iCo: Evaluating Word Meaning in Context across Low-ResourceLanguages with Adversarial Examples [51.048234591165155]
  We present AM2iCo, Adversarial and Multilingual Meaning in Context. It aims to faithfully assess the ability of state-of-the-art (SotA) representation models to understand the identity of word meaning in cross-lingual contexts. Results reveal that current SotA pretrained encoders substantially lag behind human performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T20:23:45Z)
• Probing Pretrained Language Models for Lexical Semantics [76.73599166020307]
  We present a systematic empirical analysis across six typologically diverse languages and five different lexical tasks. Our results indicate patterns and best practices that hold universally, but also point to prominent variations across languages and tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-12T14:24:01Z)
• Speakers Fill Lexical Semantic Gaps with Context [65.08205006886591]
  We operationalise the lexical ambiguity of a word as the entropy of meanings it can take. We find significant correlations between our estimate of ambiguity and the number of synonyms a word has in WordNet. This suggests that, in the presence of ambiguity, speakers compensate by making contexts more informative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T17:19:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.