Speakers Fill Lexical Semantic Gaps with Context

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.02172v4
• Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 16:00:24 GMT
• Title: Speakers Fill Lexical Semantic Gaps with Context
• Authors: Tiago Pimentel, Rowan Hall Maudslay, Damián Blasi, Ryan Cotterell,
• Abstract summary: We operationalise the lexical ambiguity of a word as the entropy of meanings it can take. We find significant correlations between our estimate of ambiguity and the number of synonyms a word has in WordNet. This suggests that, in the presence of ambiguity, speakers compensate by making contexts more informative.
• Score: 65.08205006886591
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Lexical ambiguity is widespread in language, allowing for the reuse of economical word forms and therefore making language more efficient. If ambiguous words cannot be disambiguated from context, however, this gain in efficiency might make language less clear -- resulting in frequent miscommunication. For a language to be clear and efficiently encoded, we posit that the lexical ambiguity of a word type should correlate with how much information context provides about it, on average. To investigate whether this is the case, we operationalise the lexical ambiguity of a word as the entropy of meanings it can take, and provide two ways to estimate this -- one which requires human annotation (using WordNet), and one which does not (using BERT), making it readily applicable to a large number of languages. We validate these measures by showing that, on six high-resource languages, there are significant Pearson correlations between our BERT-based estimate of ambiguity and the number of synonyms a word has in WordNet (e.g. $\rho = 0.40$ in English). We then test our main hypothesis -- that a word's lexical ambiguity should negatively correlate with its contextual uncertainty -- and find significant correlations on all 18 typologically diverse languages we analyse. This suggests that, in the presence of ambiguity, speakers compensate by making contexts more informative.

Related papers

• Word Sense Disambiguation in Native Spanish: A Comprehensive Lexical Evaluation Resource [2.7775559369441964]
  A lexical meaning of a word in context can be determined automatically by Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) algorithms. This study introduces a new resource for Spanish WSD. It includes a sense inventory and a lexical dataset sourced from the Diccionario de la Lengua Espanola.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T17:22:33Z)
• Beyond Shared Vocabulary: Increasing Representational Word Similarities across Languages for Multilingual Machine Translation [9.794506112999823]
  In this paper, we define word-level information transfer pathways via word equivalence classes and rely on graph networks to fuse word embeddings across languages. Our experiments demonstrate the advantages of our approach: 1) embeddings of words with similar meanings are better aligned across languages, 2) our method achieves consistent BLEU improvements of up to 2.3 points for high- and low-resource MNMT, and 3) less than 1.0% additional trainable parameters are required with a limited increase in computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:11:00Z)
• We're Afraid Language Models Aren't Modeling Ambiguity [136.8068419824318]
  Managing ambiguity is a key part of human language understanding. We characterize ambiguity in a sentence by its effect on entailment relations with another sentence. We show that a multilabel NLI model can flag political claims in the wild that are misleading due to ambiguity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-27T17:57:58Z)
• Transparency Helps Reveal When Language Models Learn Meaning [71.96920839263457]
  Our systematic experiments with synthetic data reveal that, with languages where all expressions have context-independent denotations, both autoregressive and masked language models learn to emulate semantic relations between expressions. Turning to natural language, our experiments with a specific phenomenon -- referential opacity -- add to the growing body of evidence that current language models do not well-represent natural language semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T02:35:19Z)
• Subject Verb Agreement Error Patterns in Meaningless Sentences: Humans vs. BERT [64.40111510974957]
  We test whether meaning interferes with subject-verb number agreement in English. We generate semantically well-formed and nonsensical items. We find that BERT and humans are both sensitive to our semantic manipulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T17:57:23Z)
• Lost in Context? On the Sense-wise Variance of Contextualized Word Embeddings [11.475144702935568]
  We quantify how much the contextualized embeddings of each word sense vary across contexts in typical pre-trained models. We find that word representations are position-biased, where the first words in different contexts tend to be more similar.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-20T12:27:25Z)
• RAW-C: Relatedness of Ambiguous Words--in Context (A New Lexical Resource for English) [2.792030485253753]
  We evaluate how well contextualized embeddings accommodate the continuous, dynamic nature of word meaning. We show that cosine distance systematically underestimates how similar humans find uses of the same sense of a word to be. We propose a synthesis between psycholinguistic theories of the mental lexicon and computational models of lexical semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-27T16:07:13Z)
• AM2iCo: Evaluating Word Meaning in Context across Low-ResourceLanguages with Adversarial Examples [51.048234591165155]
  We present AM2iCo, Adversarial and Multilingual Meaning in Context. It aims to faithfully assess the ability of state-of-the-art (SotA) representation models to understand the identity of word meaning in cross-lingual contexts. Results reveal that current SotA pretrained encoders substantially lag behind human performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T20:23:45Z)
• On the Importance of Word Order Information in Cross-lingual Sequence Labeling [80.65425412067464]
  Cross-lingual models that fit into the word order of the source language might fail to handle target languages. We investigate whether making models insensitive to the word order of the source language can improve the adaptation performance in target languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-30T03:35:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.