Simulated Interactive Debugging

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09694v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 17:47:18 GMT
• Title: Simulated Interactive Debugging
• Authors: Yannic Noller, Erick Chandra, Srinidhi HC, Kenny Choo, Cyrille Jegourel, Oka Kurniawan, Christopher M. Poskitt,
• Abstract summary: We present our approach called Simulated Interactive that interactively guides students along the debug process. The guidance aims to empower the students to repair their solutions and have a proper "learning" experience.
• Score: 3.3333163429719677
• License:
• Abstract: Debugging software, i.e., the localization of faults and their repair, is a main activity in software engineering. Therefore, effective and efficient debugging is one of the core skills a software engineer must develop. However, the teaching of debugging techniques is usually very limited or only taught in indirect ways, e.g., during software projects. As a result, most Computer Science (CS) students learn debugging only in an ad-hoc and unstructured way. In this work, we present our approach called Simulated Interactive Debugging that interactively guides students along the debugging process. The guidance aims to empower the students to repair their solutions and have a proper "learning" experience. We envision that such guided debugging techniques can be integrated into programming courses early in the CS education curriculum. To perform an initial evaluation, we developed a prototypical implementation using traditional fault localization techniques and large language models. Students can use features like the automated setting of breakpoints or an interactive chatbot. We designed and executed a controlled experiment that included this IDE-integrated tooling with eight undergraduate CS students. Based on the responses, we conclude that the participants liked the systematic guidance by the assisted debugger. In particular, they rated the automated setting of breakpoints as the most effective, followed by the interactive debugging and chatting, and the explanations for how breakpoints were set. In our future work, we will improve our concept and implementation, add new features, and perform more intensive user studies.

Related papers

• ToolCoder: A Systematic Code-Empowered Tool Learning Framework for Large Language Models [49.04652315815501]
  Tool learning has emerged as a crucial capability for large language models (LLMs) to solve complex real-world tasks through interaction with external tools. We propose ToolCoder, a novel framework that reformulates tool learning as a code generation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T03:42:28Z)
• A Proposal for a Debugging Learning Support Environment for Undergraduate Students Majoring in Computer Science [0.0]
  Students do not know how to use a debugger or have never used one. We implemented a function in Scratch that allows for self-learning of correct breakpoint placement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T03:34:19Z)
• WIP: A Unit Testing Framework for Self-Guided Personalized Online Robotics Learning [3.613641107321095]
  This paper focuses on creating a system for unit testing while integrating it into the course workflow. In line with the framework's personalized student-centered approach, this method makes it easier for students to revise, and debug their programming work. The course workflow updated to include unit tests will strengthen the learning environment and make it more interactive so that students can learn how to program robots in a self-guided fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-18T00:56:46Z)
• NExT: Teaching Large Language Models to Reason about Code Execution [50.93581376646064]
  Large language models (LLMs) of code are typically trained on the surface textual form of programs. We propose NExT, a method to teach LLMs to inspect the execution traces of programs and reason about their run-time behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T01:46:32Z)
• NuzzleBug: Debugging Block-Based Programs in Scratch [11.182625995483862]
  NuzzleBug is an extension of the popular block-based programming environment Scratch. It is an interrogative debugger that enables to ask questions about executions and provides answers. We find that teachers consider NuzzleBug to be useful, and children can use it to debug faulty programs effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T18:56:26Z)
• CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing [139.77117915309023]
  CRITIC allows large language models to validate and amend their own outputs in a manner similar to human interaction with tools. Comprehensive evaluations involving free-form question answering, mathematical program synthesis, and toxicity reduction demonstrate that CRITIC consistently enhances the performance of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T15:19:44Z)
• Giving Feedback on Interactive Student Programs with Meta-Exploration [74.5597783609281]
  Developing interactive software, such as websites or games, is a particularly engaging way to learn computer science. Standard approaches require instructors to manually grade student-implemented interactive programs. Online platforms that serve millions, like Code.org, are unable to provide any feedback on assignments for implementing interactive programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T10:00:23Z)
• Learning Multi-Objective Curricula for Deep Reinforcement Learning [55.27879754113767]
  Various automatic curriculum learning (ACL) methods have been proposed to improve the sample efficiency and final performance of deep reinforcement learning (DRL) In this paper, we propose a unified automatic curriculum learning framework to create multi-objective but coherent curricula. In addition to existing hand-designed curricula paradigms, we further design a flexible memory mechanism to learn an abstract curriculum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-06T19:30:25Z)
• ProtoTransformer: A Meta-Learning Approach to Providing Student Feedback [54.142719510638614]
  In this paper, we frame the problem of providing feedback as few-shot classification. A meta-learner adapts to give feedback to student code on a new programming question from just a few examples by instructors. Our approach was successfully deployed to deliver feedback to 16,000 student exam-solutions in a programming course offered by a tier 1 university.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-23T22:41:28Z)
• Eye: Program Visualizer for CS2 [1.319058156672392]
  Eye is an interactive tool that visualizes a program's execution as it runs. It demonstrates properties and usage of data structures in a general environment. Eye opens up a gateway for CS2 students to more easily understand myriads of programs that are available on online programming websites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-28T16:16:59Z)
• Securing Bring-Your-Own-Device (BYOD) Programming Exams [1.9164932573056916]
  Traditional pen and paper exams are inadequate for modern university programming courses. Many institutions lack the resources or space to be able to run assessments in dedicated computer labs. This has motivated the development of bring-your-own-device (BYOD) exam formats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-12T15:01:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.