Developing an Ontology for AI Act Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.10391v1
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:37:33 GMT
- Title: Developing an Ontology for AI Act Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments
- Authors: Tytti Rintamaki, Harshvardhan J. Pandit,
- Abstract summary: The recently published EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) regulates the use of AI technologies.
One of its novel requirements is the obligation to conduct a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA)
We present our novel representation of the FRIA as an ontology based on semantic web standards.
- Score: 0.0
- License:
- Abstract: The recently published EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) is a landmark regulation that regulates the use of AI technologies. One of its novel requirements is the obligation to conduct a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA), where organisations in the role of deployers must assess the risks of their AI system regarding health, safety, and fundamental rights. Another novelty in the AI Act is the requirement to create a questionnaire and an automated tool to support organisations in their FRIA obligations. Such automated tools will require a machine-readable form of information involved within the FRIA process, and additionally also require machine-readable documentation to enable further compliance tools to be created. In this article, we present our novel representation of the FRIA as an ontology based on semantic web standards. Our work builds upon the existing state of the art, notably the Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV), where similar works have been established to create tools for GDPR's Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIA) and other obligations. Through our ontology, we enable the creation and management of FRIA, and the use of automated tool in its various steps.
Related papers
- The Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) in the AI Act: Roots, legal obligations and key elements for a model template [55.2480439325792]
Article aims to fill existing gaps in the theoretical and methodological elaboration of the Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA)
This article outlines the main building blocks of a model template for the FRIA.
It can serve as a blueprint for other national and international regulatory initiatives to ensure that AI is fully consistent with human rights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-07T11:55:55Z) - Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act)
Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence.
As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z) - How Could Generative AI Support Compliance with the EU AI Act? A Review for Safe Automated Driving Perception [4.075971633195745]
Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have become central for the perception functions of autonomous vehicles.
The European Union (EU) Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act aims to address these challenges by establishing stringent norms and standards for AI systems.
This review paper summarizes the requirements arising from the EU AI Act regarding DNN-based perception systems and systematically categorizes existing generative AI applications in AD.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-30T12:01:06Z) - Do Responsible AI Artifacts Advance Stakeholder Goals? Four Key Barriers Perceived by Legal and Civil Stakeholders [59.17981603969404]
The responsible AI (RAI) community has introduced numerous processes and artifacts to facilitate transparency and support the governance of AI systems.
We conduct semi-structured interviews with 19 government, legal, and civil society stakeholders who inform policy and advocacy around responsible AI efforts.
We organize these beliefs into four barriers that help explain how RAI artifacts may (inadvertently) reconfigure power relations across civil society, government, and industry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-22T00:14:37Z) - Operationalizing the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: Recommendations for Practitioners, Researchers, and Policy Makers [20.16404495546234]
Several regulatory frameworks have been introduced by different countries worldwide.
Many of these frameworks emphasize the need for auditing and improving the trustworthiness of AI tools.
Although these regulatory frameworks highlight the necessity of enforcement, practitioners often lack detailed guidance on implementing them.
We provide easy-to-understand summaries of state-of-the-art literature and highlight various gaps that exist between regulatory guidelines and existing AI research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-11T17:28:07Z) - AI Cards: Towards an Applied Framework for Machine-Readable AI and Risk Documentation Inspired by the EU AI Act [2.1897070577406734]
Despite its importance, there is a lack of standards and guidelines to assist with drawing up AI and risk documentation aligned with the AI Act.
We propose AI Cards as a novel holistic framework for representing a given intended use of an AI system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-26T09:51:49Z) - Navigating the EU AI Act: A Methodological Approach to Compliance for Safety-critical Products [0.0]
This paper presents a methodology for interpreting the EU AI Act requirements for high-risk AI systems.
We first propose an extended product quality model for AI systems, incorporating attributes relevant to the Act not covered by current quality models.
We then propose a contract-based approach to derive technical requirements at the stakeholder level.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-25T14:32:18Z) - Enabling Automated Machine Learning for Model-Driven AI Engineering [60.09869520679979]
We propose a novel approach to enable Model-Driven Software Engineering and Model-Driven AI Engineering.
In particular, we support Automated ML, thus assisting software engineers without deep AI knowledge in developing AI-intensive systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-06T10:12:56Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable
Claims [59.64274607533249]
AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable.
This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems.
We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.