Teaching Large Language Models to Regress Accurate Image Quality Scores using Score Distribution

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11561v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:04:57 GMT
• Title: Teaching Large Language Models to Regress Accurate Image Quality Scores using Score Distribution
• Authors: Zhiyuan You, Xin Cai, Jinjin Gu, Tianfan Xue, Chao Dong,
• Abstract summary: We leverage Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to regress accurate quality scores. A key challenge is that the quality score is inherently continuous, typically modeled as a Gaussian distribution, whereas MLLMs generate discrete token outputs. We propose a distribution-based approach that discretizes the score distribution into a soft label. This method preserves the characteristics of the score distribution, achieving high accuracy and maintaining inter-image relationships.
• Score: 27.411948623919226
• License:
• Abstract: With the rapid advancement of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs), MLLM-based Image Quality Assessment (IQA) methods have shown promising performance in linguistic quality description. However, current methods still fall short in accurately scoring image quality. In this work, we aim to leverage MLLMs to regress accurate quality scores. A key challenge is that the quality score is inherently continuous, typically modeled as a Gaussian distribution, whereas MLLMs generate discrete token outputs. This mismatch necessitates score discretization. Previous approaches discretize the mean score into a one-hot label, resulting in information loss and failing to capture inter-image relationships. We propose a distribution-based approach that discretizes the score distribution into a soft label. This method preserves the characteristics of the score distribution, achieving high accuracy and maintaining inter-image relationships. Moreover, to address dataset variation, where different IQA datasets exhibit various distributions, we introduce a fidelity loss based on Thurstone's model. This loss captures intra-dataset relationships, facilitating co-training across multiple IQA datasets. With these designs, we develop the distribution-based Depicted image Quality Assessment model for Score regression (DeQA-Score). Experiments across multiple benchmarks show that DeQA-Score stably outperforms baselines in score regression. Also, DeQA-Score can predict the score distribution that closely aligns with human annotations. Codes and model weights have been released in https://depictqa.github.io/deqa-score/.

Related papers

• MM-SpuBench: Towards Better Understanding of Spurious Biases in Multimodal LLMs [38.93090238335506]
  Spurious bias, a tendency to use spurious correlations between non-essential input attributes and target variables for predictions, has revealed a severe pitfall in deep learning models trained on single modality data. We introduce MM-SpuBench, a comprehensive visual question-answering (VQA) benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' reliance on nine distinct categories of spurious correlations. Our findings illuminate the persistence of the reliance on spurious correlations from these models and underscore the urge for new methodologies to mitigate spurious biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T20:29:16Z)
• Adaptive Image Quality Assessment via Teaching Large Multimodal Model to Compare [99.57567498494448]
  We introduce Compare2Score, an all-around LMM-based no-reference IQA model. During training, we generate scaled-up comparative instructions by comparing images from the same IQA dataset. Experiments on nine IQA datasets validate that the Compare2Score effectively bridges text-defined comparative levels during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T17:26:09Z)
• Evaluating Generative Language Models in Information Extraction as Subjective Question Correction [49.729908337372436]
  We propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score. Inspired by the principles in subjective question correction, we propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score. Results on three information extraction tasks show that SQC-Score is more preferred by human annotators than the baseline metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T15:36:53Z)
• Depicting Beyond Scores: Advancing Image Quality Assessment through Multi-modal Language Models [28.194638379354252]
  We introduce a Depicted image Quality Assessment method (DepictQA), overcoming the constraints of traditional score-based methods. DepictQA allows for detailed, language-based, human-like evaluation of image quality by leveraging Multi-modal Large Language Models. These results showcase the research potential of multi-modal IQA methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-14T14:10:02Z)
• Robust Outlier Rejection for 3D Registration with Variational Bayes [70.98659381852787]
  We develop a novel variational non-local network-based outlier rejection framework for robust alignment. We propose a voting-based inlier searching strategy to cluster the high-quality hypothetical inliers for transformation estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T03:48:56Z)
• Consistent Diffusion Models: Mitigating Sampling Drift by Learning to be Consistent [97.64313409741614]
  We propose to enforce a emphconsistency property which states that predictions of the model on its own generated data are consistent across time. We show that our novel training objective yields state-of-the-art results for conditional and unconditional generation in CIFAR-10 and baseline improvements in AFHQ and FFHQ.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-17T18:45:04Z)
• Incorporating Crowdsourced Annotator Distributions into Ensemble Modeling to Improve Classification Trustworthiness for Ancient Greek Papyri [3.870354915766567]
  Two issues which complicate the problem on such datasets are class imbalance and ground-truth uncertainty in labeling. The application of ensemble modeling to such datasets can help identify images where the ground-truth is questionable and quantify the trustworthiness of those samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T19:39:14Z)
• Understanding out-of-distribution accuracies through quantifying difficulty of test samples [10.266928164137635]
  Existing works show that although modern neural networks achieve remarkable generalization performance on the in-distribution (ID) dataset, the accuracy drops significantly on the out-of-distribution (OOD) datasets. We propose a new metric to quantify the difficulty of the test images (either ID or OOD) that depends on the interaction of the training dataset and the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-28T21:13:41Z)
• Auto-Encoding Score Distribution Regression for Action Quality Assessment [41.45638722765149]
  Action quality assessment (AQA) from videos is a challenging vision task. Traditionally, AQA task is treated as a regression problem to learn the underlying mappings between videos and action scores. We develop Distribution Auto-Encoder (DAE) to address the above problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T07:30:04Z)
• Feature Quantization Improves GAN Training [126.02828112121874]
  Feature Quantization (FQ) for the discriminator embeds both true and fake data samples into a shared discrete space. Our method can be easily plugged into existing GAN models, with little computational overhead in training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-05T04:06:50Z)
• AvgOut: A Simple Output-Probability Measure to Eliminate Dull Responses [97.50616524350123]
  We build dialogue models that are dynamically aware of what utterances or tokens are dull without any feature-engineering. The first model, MinAvgOut, directly maximizes the diversity score through the output distributions of each batch. The second model, Label Fine-Tuning (LFT), prepends to the source sequence a label continuously scaled by the diversity score to control the diversity level. The third model, RL, adopts Reinforcement Learning and treats the diversity score as a reward signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-15T18:32:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.