Towards Detecting Prompt Knowledge Gaps for Improved LLM-guided Issue Resolution

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11709v3
• Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 18:32:14 GMT
• Title: Towards Detecting Prompt Knowledge Gaps for Improved LLM-guided Issue Resolution
• Authors: Ramtin Ehsani, Sakshi Pathak, Preetha Chatterjee,
• Abstract summary: We analyze 433 developer-ChatGPT conversations within GitHub issue threads to examine the impact of prompt knowledge gaps and conversation styles on issue resolution.<n>We find that ineffective conversations contain knowledge gaps in 44.6% of prompts, compared to only 12.6% in effective ones.
• Score: 3.768737590492549
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have become essential in software development, especially for issue resolution. However, despite their widespread use, significant challenges persist in the quality of LLM responses to issue resolution queries. LLM interactions often yield incorrect, incomplete, or ambiguous information, largely due to knowledge gaps in prompt design, which can lead to unproductive exchanges and reduced developer productivity. In this paper, we analyze 433 developer-ChatGPT conversations within GitHub issue threads to examine the impact of prompt knowledge gaps and conversation styles on issue resolution. We identify four main knowledge gaps in developer prompts: Missing Context, Missing Specifications, Multiple Context, and Unclear Instructions. Assuming that conversations within closed issues contributed to successful resolutions while those in open issues did not, we find that ineffective conversations contain knowledge gaps in 44.6% of prompts, compared to only 12.6% in effective ones. Additionally, we observe seven distinct conversational styles, with Directive Prompting, Chain of Thought, and Responsive Feedback being the most prevalent. We find that knowledge gaps are present in all styles of conversations, with Missing Context being the most repeated challenge developers face in issue-resolution conversations. Based on our analysis, we identify key textual and code-related heuristics (Specificity, Contextual Richness, and Clarity) that are associated with successful issue closure and help assess prompt quality. These heuristics lay the foundation for an automated tool that can dynamically flag unclear prompts and suggest structured improvements. To test feasibility, we developed a lightweight browser extension prototype for detecting prompt gaps, that can be easily adapted to other tools within developer workflows.

Related papers

• Teaching Language Models To Gather Information Proactively [53.85419549904644]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly expected to function as collaborative partners.<n>In this work, we introduce a new task paradigm: proactive information gathering.<n>We design a scalable framework that generates partially specified, real-world tasks, masking key information.<n>Within this setup, our core innovation is a reinforcement finetuning strategy that rewards questions that elicit genuinely new, implicit user information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T23:50:09Z)
• What Makes ChatGPT Effective for Software Issue Resolution? An Empirical Study of Developer-ChatGPT Conversations in GitHub [4.928297656574645]
  We analyze 686 developer-ChatGPT conversations shared within GitHub issue threads to identify characteristics that make these conversations effective for issue resolution.<n>ChatGPT is most effective for code generation and tools/libraries/APIs recommendations, but struggles with code explanations.<n>At the issue level, ChatGPT performs best on simpler problems with limited developer activity and faster resolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T17:00:48Z)
• Question-Aware Knowledge Graph Prompting for Enhancing Large Language Models [51.47994645529258]
  We propose Question-Aware Knowledge Graph Prompting (QAP), which incorporates question embeddings into GNN aggregation to dynamically assess KG relevance. Experimental results demonstrate that QAP outperforms state-of-the-art methods across multiple datasets, highlighting its effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T17:09:11Z)
• MINTQA: A Multi-Hop Question Answering Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on New and Tail Knowledge [24.66666826440994]
  MINTQA is a benchmark to evaluate large language models' capabilities in multi-hop reasoning.<n> MINTQA comprises 10,479 question-answer pairs for evaluating new knowledge and 17,887 pairs for assessing long-tail knowledge.<n>Our systematic evaluation of 22 state-of-the-art LLMs on MINTQA reveals significant limitations in their ability to handle complex knowledge base queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-22T14:17:12Z)
• Bridging Context Gaps: Leveraging Coreference Resolution for Long Contextual Understanding [28.191029786204624]
  We introduce the Long Question Coreference Adaptation (LQCA) method to enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs) This framework focuses on coreference resolution tailored to long contexts, allowing the model to identify and manage references effectively. Our code is public at https://github.com/OceannTwT/LQCA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T15:39:55Z)
• Knowledge Tagging System on Math Questions via LLMs with Flexible Demonstration Retriever [48.5585921817745]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are used to automate the knowledge tagging task. We show the strong performance of zero- and few-shot results over math questions knowledge tagging tasks. By proposing a reinforcement learning-based demonstration retriever, we successfully exploit the great potential of different-sized LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T23:30:01Z)
• Reasoning in Conversation: Solving Subjective Tasks through Dialogue Simulation for Large Language Models [56.93074140619464]
  We propose RiC (Reasoning in Conversation), a method that focuses on solving subjective tasks through dialogue simulation. The motivation of RiC is to mine useful contextual information by simulating dialogues instead of supplying chain-of-thought style rationales. We evaluate both API-based and open-source LLMs including GPT-4, ChatGPT, and OpenChat across twelve tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T05:37:10Z)
• Exploring Interaction Patterns for Debugging: Enhancing Conversational Capabilities of AI-assistants [18.53732314023887]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) enable programmers to obtain natural language explanations for various software development tasks. LLMs often leap to action without sufficient context, giving rise to implicit assumptions and inaccurate responses. In this paper, we draw inspiration from interaction patterns and conversation analysis -- to design Robin, an enhanced conversational AI-assistant for debug.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T07:44:27Z)
• Competition-Level Problems are Effective LLM Evaluators [121.15880285283116]
  This paper aims to evaluate the reasoning capacities of large language models (LLMs) in solving recent programming problems in Codeforces. We first provide a comprehensive evaluation of GPT-4's peiceived zero-shot performance on this task, considering various aspects such as problems' release time, difficulties, and types of errors encountered. Surprisingly, theThoughtived performance of GPT-4 has experienced a cliff like decline in problems after September 2021 consistently across all the difficulties and types of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T18:58:57Z)
• DIVKNOWQA: Assessing the Reasoning Ability of LLMs via Open-Domain Question Answering over Knowledge Base and Text [73.68051228972024]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive generation capabilities, but they suffer from hallucinations when relying on their internal knowledge. Retrieval-augmented LLMs have emerged as a potential solution to ground LLMs in external knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T04:37:57Z)
• Beyond Factuality: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models as Knowledge Generators [78.63553017938911]
  Large language models (LLMs) outperform information retrieval techniques for downstream knowledge-intensive tasks. However, community concerns abound regarding the factuality and potential implications of using this uncensored knowledge. We introduce CONNER, designed to evaluate generated knowledge from six important perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T08:22:37Z)
• Knowledge Crosswords: Geometric Knowledge Reasoning with Large Language Models [49.23348672822087]
  We propose Knowledge Crosswords, a benchmark consisting of incomplete knowledge networks bounded by structured factual constraints. The novel setting of geometric knowledge reasoning necessitates new LM abilities beyond existing atomic/linear multi-hop QA. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate existing LLMs and approaches on Knowledge Crosswords.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T15:43:53Z)
• Re-Reading Improves Reasoning in Large Language Models [87.46256176508376]
  We introduce a simple, yet general and effective prompting method, Re2, to enhance the reasoning capabilities of off-the-shelf Large Language Models (LLMs) Unlike most thought-eliciting prompting methods, such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT), Re2 shifts the focus to the input by processing questions twice, thereby enhancing the understanding process. We evaluate Re2 on extensive reasoning benchmarks across 14 datasets, spanning 112 experiments, to validate its effectiveness and generality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T14:36:23Z)
• Extending the Frontier of ChatGPT: Code Generation and Debugging [0.0]
  ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has ushered in a new era by utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) to tackle diverse problem domains. This research paper delves into the efficacy of ChatGPT in solving programming problems, examining both the correctness and the efficiency of its solution in terms of time and memory complexity. The research reveals a commendable overall success rate of 71.875%, denoting the proportion of problems for which ChatGPT was able to provide correct solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T06:06:58Z)
• Using an LLM to Help With Code Understanding [13.53616539787915]
  Large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing the process of writing code. Our plugin queries OpenAI's GPT-3.5-turbo model with four high-level requests without the user having to write explicit prompts. We evaluate this system in a user study with 32 participants, which confirms that using our plugin can aid task completion more than web search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T00:49:06Z)
• PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Prompts [76.18347405302728]
  This study uses a plethora of adversarial textual attacks targeting prompts across multiple levels: character, word, sentence, and semantic. The adversarial prompts are then employed in diverse tasks including sentiment analysis, natural language inference, reading comprehension, machine translation, and math problem-solving. Our findings demonstrate that contemporary Large Language Models are not robust to adversarial prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T15:37:00Z)
• Employing Deep Learning and Structured Information Retrieval to Answer Clarification Questions on Bug Reports [3.462843004438096]
  We propose a novel approach that uses CodeT5 in combination with Lucene to recommend answers to follow-up questions. We evaluate our recommended answers with the manually annotated answers using similarity metrics like Normalized Smooth BLEU Score, METEOR, Word Mover's Distance, and Semantic Similarity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-24T23:29:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.