Who is to Blame: A Comprehensive Review of Challenges and Opportunities in Designer-Developer Collaboration
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11748v1
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 21:11:06 GMT
- Title: Who is to Blame: A Comprehensive Review of Challenges and Opportunities in Designer-Developer Collaboration
- Authors: Shutong Zhang, Tianyu Zhang, Jinghui Cheng, Shurui Zhou,
- Abstract summary: Software development relies on effective collaboration between Software Development Engineers (SDEs) and User eXperience Designers (UXDs) to create software products of high quality and usability.
We conducted a systematic literature review of 45 papers published since 2004 to uncover three key collaboration challenges and two main categories of potential best practices.
Our findings have broad applicability for collaboration in software development, extending beyond the partnership between SDEs and UXDs.
- Score: 20.90113991224472
- License:
- Abstract: Software development relies on effective collaboration between Software Development Engineers (SDEs) and User eXperience Designers (UXDs) to create software products of high quality and usability. While this collaboration issue has been explored over the past decades, anecdotal evidence continues to indicate the existence of challenges in their collaborative efforts. To understand this gap, we first conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) of 45 papers published since 2004, uncovering three key collaboration challenges and two main categories of potential best practices. We then analyzed designer and developer forums and discussions from one open-source software repository to assess how the challenges and practices manifest in the status quo. Our findings have broad applicability for collaboration in software development, extending beyond the partnership between SDEs and UXDs. The suggested best practices and interventions also act as a reference for future research, assisting in the development of dedicated collaboration tools for SDEs and UXDs.
Related papers
- An Overview and Catalogue of Dependency Challenges in Open Source Software Package Registries [52.23798016734889]
This article provides a catalogue of dependency-related challenges that come with relying on OSS packages or libraries.
The catalogue is based on the scientific literature on empirical research that has been conducted to understand, quantify and overcome these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-27T16:20:20Z) - Multi-Agent Software Development through Cross-Team Collaboration [30.88149502999973]
We introduce Cross-Team Collaboration (CTC), a scalable multi-team framework for software development.
CTC enables orchestrated teams to jointly propose various decisions and communicate with their insights.
Results show a notable increase in quality compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T10:18:36Z) - A Roadmap for Software Testing in Open Collaborative Development Environments [14.113209837391183]
The distributed nature of open collaborative development, along with its diverse contributors and rapid iterations, presents new challenges for ensuring software quality.
This paper offers a comprehensive review and analysis of recent advancements in software quality assurance within open collaborative development environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-08T10:50:24Z) - Bridging Gaps, Building Futures: Advancing Software Developer Diversity and Inclusion Through Future-Oriented Research [50.545824691484796]
We present insights from SE researchers and practitioners on challenges and solutions regarding diversity and inclusion in SE.
We share potential utopian and dystopian visions of the future and provide future research directions and implications for academia and industry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T16:18:11Z) - WorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks? [83.19032025950986]
We study the use of large language model-based agents for interacting with software via web browsers.
WorkArena is a benchmark of 33 tasks based on the widely-used ServiceNow platform.
BrowserGym is an environment for the design and evaluation of such agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-12T14:58:45Z) - In-IDE Human-AI Experience in the Era of Large Language Models; A
Literature Review [2.6703221234079946]
The study of in-IDE Human-AI Experience is critical in understanding how these AI tools are transforming the software development process.
We conducted a literature review to study the current state of in-IDE Human-AI Experience research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-19T14:55:51Z) - Experiential Co-Learning of Software-Developing Agents [83.34027623428096]
Large language models (LLMs) have brought significant changes to various domains, especially in software development.
We introduce Experiential Co-Learning, a novel LLM-agent learning framework.
Experiments demonstrate that the framework enables agents to tackle unseen software-developing tasks more effectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-28T13:50:42Z) - Collaborative, Code-Proximal Dynamic Software Visualization within Code
Editors [55.57032418885258]
This paper introduces the design and proof-of-concept implementation for a software visualization approach that can be embedded into code editors.
Our contribution differs from related work in that we use dynamic analysis of a software system's runtime behavior.
Our visualization approach enhances common remote pair programming tools and is collaboratively usable by employing shared code cities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-30T06:35:40Z) - The GitHub Development Workflow Automation Ecosystems [47.818229204130596]
Large-scale software development has become a highly collaborative endeavour.
This chapter explores the ecosystems of development bots and GitHub Actions.
It provides an extensive survey of the state-of-the-art in this domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-08T15:24:23Z) - Code Recommendation for Open Source Software Developers [32.181023933552694]
CODER is a novel graph-based code recommendation framework for open source software developers.
Our framework achieves superior performance under various experimental settings, including intra-project, cross-project, and cold-start recommendation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-15T16:40:36Z) - Industry-academia research collaboration and knowledge co-creation:
Patterns and anti-patterns [12.434688497507397]
This paper reports on the experience of research collaboration and knowledge co-creation between industry and academia in software engineering.
Our experience spans 14 years of collaboration between researchers in software engineering and the European and Norwegian software and IT industry.
Drawing upon the findings made and the experience gained, we provide a set of 14 patterns and 14 anti-patterns for industry-academia collaborations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-29T16:10:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.