FedCLEAN: byzantine defense by CLustering Errors of Activation maps in Non-IID federated learning environments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12123v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 13:37:28 GMT
• Title: FedCLEAN: byzantine defense by CLustering Errors of Activation maps in Non-IID federated learning environments
• Authors: Mehdi Ben Ghali, Reda Bellafqira, Gouenou Coatrieux,
• Abstract summary: Federated Learning (FL) enables clients to collaboratively train a global model using their local datasets while reinforcing data privacy. Existing defense mechanisms assume that clients' data are independent and identically distributed (IID), making them ineffective in real-world applications where data are non-IID. This paper presents FedCLEAN, the first defense capable of filtering attackers' model updates in a non-IID FL environment.
• Score: 2.5490583414858836
• License:
• Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) enables clients to collaboratively train a global model using their local datasets while reinforcing data privacy. However, FL is susceptible to poisoning attacks. Existing defense mechanisms assume that clients' data are independent and identically distributed (IID), making them ineffective in real-world applications where data are non-IID. This paper presents FedCLEAN, the first defense capable of filtering attackers' model updates in a non-IID FL environment. The originality of FedCLEAN is twofold. First, it relies on a client confidence score derived from the reconstruction errors of each client's model activation maps for a given trigger set, with reconstruction errors obtained by means of a Conditional Variational Autoencoder trained according to a novel server-side strategy. Second, we propose an ad-hoc trust propagation algorithm based on client scores, which allows building a cluster of benign clients while flagging potential attackers. Experimental results on the datasets MNIST and FashionMNIST demonstrate the robustness of FedCLEAN against Byzantine attackers in non-IID scenarios and a close-to-zero benign client misclassification rate, even in the absence of an attack.

Related papers

• Rethinking Byzantine Robustness in Federated Recommendation from Sparse Aggregation Perspective [65.65471972217814]
  federated recommendation (FR) based on federated learning (FL) emerges, keeping the personal data on the local client and updating a model collaboratively. FR has a unique sparse aggregation mechanism, where the embedding of each item is updated by only partial clients, instead of full clients in a dense aggregation of general FL. In this paper, we reformulate the Byzantine robustness under sparse aggregation by defining the aggregation for a single item as the smallest execution unit. We propose a family of effective attack strategies, named Spattack, which exploit the vulnerability in sparse aggregation and are categorized along the adversary's knowledge and capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-06T15:19:26Z)
• Formal Logic-guided Robust Federated Learning against Poisoning Attacks [6.997975378492098]
  Federated Learning (FL) offers a promising solution to the privacy concerns associated with centralized Machine Learning (ML) FL is vulnerable to various security threats, including poisoning attacks, where adversarial clients manipulate the training data or model updates to degrade overall model performance. We present a defense mechanism designed to mitigate poisoning attacks in federated learning for time-series tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T16:23:19Z)
• FedCAP: Robust Federated Learning via Customized Aggregation and Personalization [13.17735010891312]
  Federated learning (FL) has been applied to various privacy-preserving scenarios. We propose FedCAP, a robust FL framework against both data heterogeneity and Byzantine attacks. We show that FedCAP performs well in several non-IID settings and shows strong robustness under a series of poisoning attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T23:01:22Z)
• Client-side Gradient Inversion Against Federated Learning from Poisoning [59.74484221875662]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables distributed participants to train a global model without sharing data directly to a central server. Recent studies have revealed that FL is vulnerable to gradient inversion attack (GIA), which aims to reconstruct the original training samples. We propose Client-side poisoning Gradient Inversion (CGI), which is a novel attack method that can be launched from clients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T03:48:27Z)
• Towards Attack-tolerant Federated Learning via Critical Parameter Analysis [85.41873993551332]
  Federated learning systems are susceptible to poisoning attacks when malicious clients send false updates to the central server. This paper proposes a new defense strategy, FedCPA (Federated learning with Critical Analysis) Our attack-tolerant aggregation method is based on the observation that benign local models have similar sets of top-k and bottom-k critical parameters, whereas poisoned local models do not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-18T05:37:55Z)
• Mitigating Cross-client GANs-based Attack in Federated Learning [78.06700142712353]
  Multi distributed multimedia clients can resort to federated learning (FL) to jointly learn a global shared model. FL suffers from the cross-client generative adversarial networks (GANs)-based (C-GANs) attack. We propose Fed-EDKD technique to improve the current popular FL schemes to resist C-GANs attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T08:15:55Z)
• FedDefender: Client-Side Attack-Tolerant Federated Learning [60.576073964874]
  Federated learning enables learning from decentralized data sources without compromising privacy. It is vulnerable to model poisoning attacks, where malicious clients interfere with the training process. We propose a new defense mechanism that focuses on the client-side, called FedDefender, to help benign clients train robust local models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-18T08:00:41Z)
• FedDefender: Backdoor Attack Defense in Federated Learning [0.0]
  Federated Learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving distributed machine learning technique. We propose FedDefender, a defense mechanism against targeted poisoning attacks in FL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-02T03:40:04Z)
• FLCert: Provably Secure Federated Learning against Poisoning Attacks [67.8846134295194]
  We propose FLCert, an ensemble federated learning framework that is provably secure against poisoning attacks. Our experiments show that the label predicted by our FLCert for a test input is provably unaffected by a bounded number of malicious clients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-02T17:50:04Z)
• A New Implementation of Federated Learning for Privacy and Security Enhancement [27.612480082254486]
  Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a new machine learning setting. No local data needs to be shared, and privacy can be well protected. We propose a model update based federated averaging algorithm to defend against Byzantine attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-03T03:13:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.