Dynamics of Toxicity in Political Podcasts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12640v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:58:50 GMT
• Title: Dynamics of Toxicity in Political Podcasts
• Authors: Naquee Rizwan, Nayandeep Deb, Sarthak Roy, Vishwajeet Singh Solanki, Kiran Garimella, Animesh Mukherjee,
• Abstract summary: Toxicity in digital media poses significant challenges, yet little attention has been given to its dynamics within the rapidly growing medium of podcasts.<n>This paper addresses this gap by analyzing political podcast data to study the emergence and propagation of toxicity.<n>We systematically examine toxic discourse in over 30 popular political podcasts in the United States.
• Score: 4.5621281512257434
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Toxicity in digital media poses significant challenges, yet little attention has been given to its dynamics within the rapidly growing medium of podcasts. This paper addresses this gap by analyzing political podcast data to study the emergence and propagation of toxicity, focusing on conversation chains-structured reply patterns within podcast transcripts. Leveraging state-of-the-art transcription models and advanced conversational analysis techniques, we systematically examine toxic discourse in over 30 popular political podcasts in the United States. Our key contributions include: (1) creating a comprehensive dataset of transcribed and diarized political podcasts, identifying thousands of toxic instances using Google's Perspective API, (2) uncovering concerning trends where a majority of episodes contain at least one toxic instance, (3) introducing toxic conversation chains and analyzing their structural and linguistic properties, revealing characteristics such as longer durations, repetitive patterns, figurative language, and emotional cues tied to anger and annoyance, (4) identifying demand-related words like 'want', 'like', and 'know' as precursors to toxicity, and (5) developing predictive models to anticipate toxicity shifts based on annotated change points. Our findings provide critical insights into podcast toxicity and establish a foundation for future research on real-time monitoring and intervention mechanisms to foster healthier discourse in this influential medium.

Related papers

• Talking Point based Ideological Discourse Analysis in News Events [62.18747509565779]
  We propose a framework motivated by the theory of ideological discourse analysis to analyze news articles related to real-world events. Our framework represents the news articles using a relational structure - talking points, which captures the interaction between entities, their roles, and media frames along with a topic of discussion. We evaluate our framework's ability to generate these perspectives through automated tasks - ideology and partisan classification tasks, supplemented by human validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T02:52:34Z)
• MoonCast: High-Quality Zero-Shot Podcast Generation [81.29927724674602]
  MoonCast is a solution for high-quality zero-shot podcast generation. It aims to synthesize natural podcast-style speech from text-only sources. Experiments demonstrate that MoonCast outperforms baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T15:25:08Z)
• SafeSpeech: A Comprehensive and Interactive Tool for Analysing Sexist and Abusive Language in Conversations [7.4815142964548205]
  SafeSpeech is a comprehensive platform for toxic content detection and analysis. It bridges message-level and conversation-level insights. The platform integrates fine-tuned classifiers and large language models. Evaluations on benchmark datasets, including EDOS, OffensEval, and HatEval, demonstrate the reproduction of state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T09:31:17Z)
• WavChat: A Survey of Spoken Dialogue Models [66.82775211793547]
  Recent advancements in spoken dialogue models, exemplified by systems like GPT-4o, have captured significant attention in the speech domain. These advanced spoken dialogue models not only comprehend audio, music, and other speech-related features, but also capture stylistic and timbral characteristics in speech. Despite the progress in spoken dialogue systems, there is a lack of comprehensive surveys that systematically organize and analyze these systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T04:16:45Z)
• Characterizing Online Toxicity During the 2022 Mpox Outbreak: A Computational Analysis of Topical and Network Dynamics [0.9831489366502301]
  The 2022 Mpox outbreak, initially termed "Monkeypox" but subsequently renamed to mitigate associated stigmas and societal concerns, serves as a poignant backdrop to this issue. We collected more than 1.6 million unique tweets and analyzed them from five dimensions, including context, extent, content, speaker, and intent. We identified five high-level topic categories in the toxic online discourse on Twitter, including disease (46.6%), health policy and healthcare (19.3%), homophobia (23.9%), politics. We found that retweets of toxic content were widespread, while influential users rarely engaged with or countered this toxicity through retweets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T19:31:01Z)
• Dynamic Causal Disentanglement Model for Dialogue Emotion Detection [77.96255121683011]
  We propose a Dynamic Causal Disentanglement Model based on hidden variable separation. This model effectively decomposes the content of dialogues and investigates the temporal accumulation of emotions. Specifically, we propose a dynamic temporal disentanglement model to infer the propagation of utterances and hidden variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T12:58:09Z)
• SpokenWOZ: A Large-Scale Speech-Text Benchmark for Spoken Task-Oriented Dialogue Agents [72.42049370297849]
  SpokenWOZ is a large-scale speech-text dataset for spoken TOD. Cross-turn slot and reasoning slot detection are new challenges for SpokenWOZ.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T13:47:51Z)
• Handling Bias in Toxic Speech Detection: A Survey [26.176340438312376]
  We look at proposed methods for evaluating and mitigating bias in toxic speech detection. Case study introduces the concept of bias shift due to knowledge-based bias mitigation. Survey concludes with an overview of the critical challenges, research gaps, and future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T10:38:36Z)
• Revisiting Contextual Toxicity Detection in Conversations [28.465019968374413]
  We show that toxicity labelling by humans is in general influenced by the conversational structure, polarity and topic of the context. We propose to bring these findings into computational detection models by introducing (a) neural architectures for contextual toxicity detection. We have also demonstrated that such models can benefit from synthetic data, especially in the social media domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-24T11:50:37Z)
• Speech Toxicity Analysis: A New Spoken Language Processing Task [32.297717021285344]
  Toxic speech, also known as hate speech, is regarded as one of the crucial issues plaguing online social media today. We propose a new Spoken Language Processing task of detecting toxicity from spoken speech. We introduce DeToxy, the first publicly available toxicity annotated dataset for English speech, sourced from various openly available speech databases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T17:51:04Z)
• Mitigating Biases in Toxic Language Detection through Invariant Rationalization [70.36701068616367]
  biases toward some attributes, including gender, race, and dialect, exist in most training datasets for toxicity detection. We propose to use invariant rationalization (InvRat), a game-theoretic framework consisting of a rationale generator and a predictor, to rule out the spurious correlation of certain syntactic patterns. Our method yields lower false positive rate in both lexical and dialectal attributes than previous debiasing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T08:49:52Z)
• Modeling Language Usage and Listener Engagement in Podcasts [3.8966039534272916]
  We investigate how various factors -- vocabulary diversity, distinctiveness, emotion, and syntax -- correlate with engagement. We build models with different textual representations, and show that the identified features are highly predictive of engagement. Our analysis tests popular wisdom about stylistic elements in high-engagement podcasts, corroborating some aspects, and adding new perspectives on others.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-11T20:40:15Z)
• Challenges in Automated Debiasing for Toxic Language Detection [81.04406231100323]
  Biased associations have been a challenge in the development of classifiers for detecting toxic language. We investigate recently introduced debiasing methods for text classification datasets and models, as applied to toxic language detection. Our focus is on lexical (e.g., swear words, slurs, identity mentions) and dialectal markers (specifically African American English)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-29T22:03:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.