Preference Curriculum: LLMs Should Always Be Pretrained on Their Preferred Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.13126v2
• Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 11:44:35 GMT
• Title: Preference Curriculum: LLMs Should Always Be Pretrained on Their Preferred Data
• Authors: Xuemiao Zhang, Liangyu Xu, Feiyu Duan, Yongwei Zhou, Sirui Wang, Rongxiang Weng, Jingang Wang, Xunliang Cai,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) generally utilize a consistent data distribution throughout the pretraining process. As the model's capability improves, it is intuitive that its data preferences dynamically change, indicating the need for pretraining with different data at various training stages. We propose the Perplexity Difference (PD) based Preference Curriculum learning framework, which always perceives and uses the data preferred by LLMs to train and boost them.
• Score: 19.221998577357713
• License:
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) generally utilize a consistent data distribution throughout the pretraining process. However, as the model's capability improves, it is intuitive that its data preferences dynamically change, indicating the need for pretraining with different data at various training stages. To achieve it, we propose the Perplexity Difference (PD) based Preference Curriculum learning (PDPC) framework, which always perceives and uses the data preferred by LLMs to train and boost them. First, we introduce the PD metric to quantify the difference in how challenging a sample is for weak versus strong models. Samples with high PD are more challenging for weak models to learn and are more suitable to be arranged in the later stage of pretraining. Second, we propose the preference function to approximate and predict the data preference of the LLM at any training step, so as to complete the arrangement of the dataset offline and ensure continuous training without interruption. Experimental results on 1.3B and 3B models demonstrate that PDPC significantly surpasses baselines. Notably, the 3B model trained on 1T tokens achieves an increased average accuracy of over 8.1% across MMLU and CMMLU.

Related papers

• Clear Preferences Leave Traces: Reference Model-Guided Sampling for Preference Learning [59.11519451499754]
  Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a de-facto approach for aligning language models with human preferences. Recent work has shown DPO's effectiveness relies on training data quality. We discover that reference model probability space naturally detects high-quality training samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-25T07:21:50Z)
• What Do Learning Dynamics Reveal About Generalization in LLM Reasoning? [83.83230167222852]
  We find that a model's generalization behavior can be effectively characterized by a training metric we call pre-memorization train accuracy. By connecting a model's learning behavior to its generalization, pre-memorization train accuracy can guide targeted improvements to training strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T09:52:40Z)
• Optimizing LLMs with Direct Preferences: A Data Efficiency Perspective [4.548047308860141]
  This study investigates the impact of different type of preference data on model performance. It aims to reduce their dependency on extensive amounts of preference data, which is expensive to collect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T00:11:41Z)
• Accelerating Large Language Model Pretraining via LFR Pedagogy: Learn, Focus, and Review [50.78587571704713]
  Learn-Focus-Review (LFR) is a dynamic training approach that adapts to the model's learning progress. LFR tracks the model's learning performance across data blocks (sequences of tokens) and prioritizes revisiting challenging regions of the dataset. Compared to baseline models trained on the full datasets, LFR consistently achieved lower perplexity and higher accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T00:59:18Z)
• Alpaca against Vicuna: Using LLMs to Uncover Memorization of LLMs [61.04246774006429]
  We introduce a black-box prompt optimization method that uses an attacker LLM agent to uncover higher levels of memorization in a victim agent. We observe that our instruction-based prompts generate outputs with 23.7% higher overlap with training data compared to the baseline prefix-suffix measurements. Our findings show that instruction-tuned models can expose pre-training data as much as their base-models, if not more so, and using instructions proposed by other LLMs can open a new avenue of automated attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T19:32:01Z)
• Take the Bull by the Horns: Hard Sample-Reweighted Continual Training Improves LLM Generalization [165.98557106089777]
  A key challenge is to enhance the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) amid a looming shortage of high-quality training data. Our study starts from an empirical strategy for the light continual training of LLMs using their original pre-training data sets. We then formalize this strategy into a principled framework of Instance-Reweighted Distributionally Robust Optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T04:10:57Z)
• How to Train Data-Efficient LLMs [56.41105687693619]
  We study data-efficient approaches for pre-training language models (LLMs) We find that Ask-LLM and Density sampling are the best methods in their respective categories. In our comparison of 19 samplers, involving hundreds of evaluation tasks and pre-training runs, we find that Ask-LLM and Density are the best methods in their respective categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T02:27:57Z)
• D4: Improving LLM Pretraining via Document De-Duplication and Diversification [38.84592304799403]
  We show that careful data selection via pre-trained model embeddings can speed up training. We also show that repeating data intelligently consistently outperforms baseline training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T17:58:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.