Scaling for Fairness? Analyzing Model Size, Data Composition, and Multilinguality in Vision-Language Bias

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.13223v2
• Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 06:58:27 GMT
• Title: Scaling for Fairness? Analyzing Model Size, Data Composition, and Multilinguality in Vision-Language Bias
• Authors: Zahraa Al Sahili, Ioannis Patras, Matthew Purver,
• Abstract summary: We investigate how dataset composition, model size, and multilingual training affect gender and racial bias in a popular VLM, CLIP, and its open source variants.<n>To assess social perception bias, we measure the zero-shot performance on face images featuring socially charged terms.
• Score: 14.632649933582648
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: As large scale vision language models become increasingly central to modern AI applications, understanding and mitigating social biases in these systems has never been more critical. We investigate how dataset composition, model size, and multilingual training affect gender and racial bias in a popular VLM, CLIP, and its open source variants. In particular, we systematically evaluate models trained on varying dataset scales and architectures, as well as multilingual versions encompassing English along with Persian, Turkish, and Finnish,languages with minimal gender marking. To assess social perception bias, we measure the zero-shot performance on face images featuring socially charged terms rooted in the psychological constructs of communion and agency, and demographic labeling bias using both the FairFace and PATA datasets. Our findings reveal three key insights. First, while larger training datasets can mitigate some biases, they may also introduce or amplify others when the data composition is imbalanced. Second, although increasing model size generally improves performance, it does not consistently reduce bias and can, in certain cases, exacerbate it. Finally, while multilingual training broadens linguistic coverage, it does not inherently neutralize bias and can transfer or intensify inequities across languages. Taken together, these results highlight the necessity of inclusive, carefully curated training data to foster fairness rather than relying solely on model scaling or language expansion. We provide a systematic evaluation for vision language bias across diverse demographics, underscoring the urgent need for intentional bias mitigation strategies in next-generation AI systems.

Related papers

• Collapsed Language Models Promote Fairness [88.48232731113306]
  We find that debiased language models exhibit collapsed alignment between token representations and word embeddings. We design a principled fine-tuning method that can effectively improve fairness in a wide range of debiasing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T13:09:48Z)
• Spoken Stereoset: On Evaluating Social Bias Toward Speaker in Speech Large Language Models [50.40276881893513]
  This study introduces Spoken Stereoset, a dataset specifically designed to evaluate social biases in Speech Large Language Models (SLLMs) By examining how different models respond to speech from diverse demographic groups, we aim to identify these biases. The findings indicate that while most models show minimal bias, some still exhibit slightly stereotypical or anti-stereotypical tendencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T16:55:06Z)
• Dataset Scale and Societal Consistency Mediate Facial Impression Bias in Vision-Language AI [17.101569078791492]
  We study 43 CLIP vision-language models to determine whether they learn human-like facial impression biases. We show for the first time that the the degree to which a bias is shared across a society predicts the degree to which it is reflected in a CLIP model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-04T08:26:58Z)
• Detecting Bias in Large Language Models: Fine-tuned KcBERT [0.0]
  We define such harm as societal bias and assess ethnic, gender, and racial biases in a model fine-tuned with Korean comments. Our contribution lies in demonstrating that societal bias exists in Korean language models due to language-dependent characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-16T02:27:19Z)
• Multilingual Text-to-Image Generation Magnifies Gender Stereotypes and Prompt Engineering May Not Help You [64.74707085021858]
  We show that multilingual models suffer from significant gender biases just as monolingual models do. We propose a novel benchmark, MAGBIG, intended to foster research on gender bias in multilingual models. Our results show that not only do models exhibit strong gender biases but they also behave differently across languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T12:02:28Z)
• Social Bias Probing: Fairness Benchmarking for Language Models [38.180696489079985]
  This paper proposes a novel framework for probing language models for social biases by assessing disparate treatment. We curate SoFa, a large-scale benchmark designed to address the limitations of existing fairness collections. We show that biases within language models are more nuanced than acknowledged, indicating a broader scope of encoded biases than previously recognized.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T16:35:59Z)
• Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey [73.87651986156006]
  We present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for large language models (LLMs) We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive, two for bias evaluation, and one for mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T00:32:55Z)
• Exposing Bias in Online Communities through Large-Scale Language Models [3.04585143845864]
  This work uses the flaw of bias in language models to explore the biases of six different online communities. The bias of the resulting models is evaluated by prompting the models with different demographics and comparing the sentiment and toxicity values of these generations. This work not only affirms how easily bias is absorbed from training data but also presents a scalable method to identify and compare the bias of different datasets or communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T08:09:26Z)
• Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Prompts [79.04467131711775]
  We propose a general approach for debiasing vision-language foundation models by projecting out biased directions in the text embedding. We show that debiasing only the text embedding with a calibrated projection matrix suffices to yield robust classifiers and fair generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-31T20:09:33Z)
• An Analysis of Social Biases Present in BERT Variants Across Multiple Languages [0.0]
  We investigate the bias present in monolingual BERT models across a diverse set of languages. We propose a template-based method to measure any kind of bias, based on sentence pseudo-likelihood. We conclude that current methods of probing for bias are highly language-dependent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T23:38:08Z)
• The Birth of Bias: A case study on the evolution of gender bias in an English language model [1.6344851071810076]
  We use a relatively small language model, using the LSTM architecture trained on an English Wikipedia corpus. We find that the representation of gender is dynamic and identify different phases during training. We show that gender information is represented increasingly locally in the input embeddings of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T00:59:04Z)
• Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Models [107.82654101403264]
  Large-scale pretrained language models (LMs) can be potentially dangerous in manifesting undesirable representational biases. We propose steps towards mitigating social biases during text generation. Our empirical results and human evaluation demonstrate effectiveness in mitigating bias while retaining crucial contextual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T17:52:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.