Hallucinations Can Improve Large Language Models in Drug Discovery
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.13824v1
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 16:45:51 GMT
- Title: Hallucinations Can Improve Large Language Models in Drug Discovery
- Authors: Shuzhou Yuan, Michael Färber,
- Abstract summary: hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) have been raised by researchers, yet their potential in areas where creativity is vital, such as drug discovery, merits exploration.
In this paper, we come up with the hypothesis that hallucinations can improve LLMs in drug discovery.
- Score: 10.573861741540853
- License:
- Abstract: Concerns about hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) have been raised by researchers, yet their potential in areas where creativity is vital, such as drug discovery, merits exploration. In this paper, we come up with the hypothesis that hallucinations can improve LLMs in drug discovery. To verify this hypothesis, we use LLMs to describe the SMILES string of molecules in natural language and then incorporate these descriptions as part of the prompt to address specific tasks in drug discovery. Evaluated on seven LLMs and five classification tasks, our findings confirm the hypothesis: LLMs can achieve better performance with text containing hallucinations. Notably, Llama-3.1-8B achieves an 18.35% gain in ROC-AUC compared to the baseline without hallucination. Furthermore, hallucinations generated by GPT-4o provide the most consistent improvements across models. Additionally, we conduct empirical analyses and a case study to investigate key factors affecting performance and the underlying reasons. Our research sheds light on the potential use of hallucinations for LLMs and offers new perspectives for future research leveraging LLMs in drug discovery.
Related papers
- A Novel Approach to Eliminating Hallucinations in Large Language Model-Assisted Causal Discovery [21.2023350773338]
We show that hallucinations exist when using large language models (LLMs) in causal discovery.
We propose using Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) to reduce hallucinations when quality data is available.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-16T03:06:39Z) - LLM Hallucination Reasoning with Zero-shot Knowledge Test [10.306443936136425]
We introduce a new task, Hallucination Reasoning, which classifies LLM-generated text into one of three categories: aligned, misaligned, and fabricated.
Our experiments conducted on new datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in hallucination reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-14T18:55:26Z) - A Survey of Hallucination in Large Visual Language Models [48.794850395309076]
The existence of hallucinations has limited the potential and practical effectiveness of LVLM in various fields.
The structure of LVLMs and main causes of hallucination generation are introduced.
The available hallucination evaluation benchmarks for LVLMs are presented.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-20T10:58:58Z) - MedHalu: Hallucinations in Responses to Healthcare Queries by Large Language Models [26.464489158584463]
We conduct a pioneering study of hallucinations in LLM-generated responses to real-world healthcare queries from patients.
We propose MedHalu, a carefully crafted first-of-its-kind medical hallucination dataset with a diverse range of health-related topics.
We also introduce MedHaluDetect framework to evaluate capabilities of various LLMs in detecting hallucinations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-29T00:09:01Z) - Hallucination Detection: Robustly Discerning Reliable Answers in Large Language Models [70.19081534515371]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption in various natural language processing tasks.
They generate unfaithful or inconsistent content that deviates from the input source, leading to severe consequences.
We propose a robust discriminator named RelD to effectively detect hallucination in LLMs' generated answers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-04T18:47:42Z) - ANAH: Analytical Annotation of Hallucinations in Large Language Models [65.12177400764506]
We present $textbfANAH$, a dataset that offers $textbfAN$alytical $textbfA$nnotation of hallucinations in Large Language Models.
ANAH consists of 12k sentence-level annotations for 4.3k LLM responses covering over 700 topics, constructed by a human-in-the-loop pipeline.
Thanks to the fine granularity of the hallucination annotations, we can quantitatively confirm that the hallucinations of LLMs accumulate in the answer and use ANAH to train and evaluate hallucination annotators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T17:54:40Z) - The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination
in Large Language Models [134.6697160940223]
hallucination poses great challenge to trustworthy and reliable deployment of large language models.
Three key questions should be well studied: how to detect hallucinations (detection), why do LLMs hallucinate (source), and what can be done to mitigate them.
This work presents a systematic empirical study on LLM hallucination, focused on the the three aspects of hallucination detection, source and mitigation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-06T12:40:45Z) - Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced
Hallucinations [67.35512483340837]
Large language models (LLMs) have been observed to generate responses that include inaccurate or fabricated information.
We propose a simple textitInduce-then-Contrast Decoding (ICD) strategy to alleviate hallucinations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-25T12:32:49Z) - A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions [40.79317187623401]
The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has marked a significant breakthrough in natural language processing (NLP)
LLMs are prone to hallucination, generating plausible yet nonfactual content.
This phenomenon raises significant concerns over the reliability of LLMs in real-world information retrieval systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-09T09:25:37Z) - HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large
Language Models [146.87696738011712]
Large language models (LLMs) are prone to generate hallucinations, i.e., content that conflicts with the source or cannot be verified by the factual knowledge.
To understand what types of content and to which extent LLMs are apt to hallucinate, we introduce the Hallucination Evaluation benchmark for Large Language Models (HaluEval)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T15:36:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.