A Survey of Optimization Methods for Training DL Models: Theoretical Perspective on Convergence and Generalization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14458v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 12:42:38 GMT
• Title: A Survey of Optimization Methods for Training DL Models: Theoretical Perspective on Convergence and Generalization
• Authors: Jing Wang, Anna Choromanska,
• Abstract summary: We provide an extensive summary of theoretical foundations of optimization methods in deep learning (DL) This paper includes theoretical analysis of popular gradient-based first-order second-order generalization methods. We also discuss the analysis of the generic convex loss and explicitly encourage the discovery of well-generalizing optimal points.
• Score: 11.072619355813496
• License:
• Abstract: As data sets grow in size and complexity, it is becoming more difficult to pull useful features from them using hand-crafted feature extractors. For this reason, deep learning (DL) frameworks are now widely popular. The Holy Grail of DL and one of the most mysterious challenges in all of modern ML is to develop a fundamental understanding of DL optimization and generalization. While numerous optimization techniques have been introduced in the literature to navigate the exploration of the highly non-convex DL optimization landscape, many survey papers reviewing them primarily focus on summarizing these methodologies, often overlooking the critical theoretical analyses of these methods. In this paper, we provide an extensive summary of the theoretical foundations of optimization methods in DL, including presenting various methodologies, their convergence analyses, and generalization abilities. This paper not only includes theoretical analysis of popular generic gradient-based first-order and second-order methods, but it also covers the analysis of the optimization techniques adapting to the properties of the DL loss landscape and explicitly encouraging the discovery of well-generalizing optimal points. Additionally, we extend our discussion to distributed optimization methods that facilitate parallel computations, including both centralized and decentralized approaches. We provide both convex and non-convex analysis for the optimization algorithms considered in this survey paper. Finally, this paper aims to serve as a comprehensive theoretical handbook on optimization methods for DL, offering insights and understanding to both novice and seasoned researchers in the field.

Related papers

• Learning Provably Improves the Convergence of Gradient Descent [9.82454981262489]
  We study the convergence of Learning to Optimize (L2O) problems by training-based solvers. An algorithm's tangent significantly enhances L2O's convergence. Our findings indicate 50% outperformance over the GD methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T02:03:30Z)
• Align-Pro: A Principled Approach to Prompt Optimization for LLM Alignment [40.71270945505082]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into various societal and decision-making processes. Traditional methods, such as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), achieve alignment by fine-tuning model parameters. In contrast, prompt optimization is a viable alternative to RLHF for LLM alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T03:14:39Z)
• See Further for Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning by Standing on the Shoulders of Decomposition [56.87609859444084]
  parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) focuses on optimizing a select subset of parameters while keeping the rest fixed, significantly lowering computational and storage overheads. We take the first step to unify all approaches by dissecting them from a decomposition perspective. We introduce two novel PEFT methods alongside a simple yet effective framework designed to enhance the performance of PEFT techniques across various applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T15:44:42Z)
• Data-driven Power Flow Linearization: Theory [9.246677771418428]
  Data-driven power flow linearization (DPFL) stands out for its higher approximation accuracy, wide adaptability, and better ability to implicitly incorporate the latest system attributes. This tutorial first classifies existing DPFL methods into DPFL training algorithms and supportive techniques. Their mathematical models, analytical solutions, capabilities, limitations, and generalizability are systematically examined, discussed, and summarized.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T22:22:41Z)
• Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint [56.74058752955209]
  This paper studies the alignment process of generative models with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) We first identify the primary challenges of existing popular methods like offline PPO and offline DPO as lacking in strategical exploration of the environment. We propose efficient algorithms with finite-sample theoretical guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T18:58:42Z)
• Understanding Optimization of Deep Learning via Jacobian Matrix and Lipschitz Constant [18.592094066642364]
  This article provides a comprehensive understanding of optimization in deep learning. We focus on the challenges of gradient vanishing and gradient exploding, which normally lead to diminished model representational ability and training instability, respectively. To help understand the current optimization methodologies, we categorize them into two classes: explicit optimization and implicit optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T17:59:27Z)
• Hierarchical Optimization-Derived Learning [58.69200830655009]
  We establish a new framework, named Hierarchical ODL (HODL), to simultaneously investigate the intrinsic behaviors of optimization-derived model construction and its corresponding learning process. This is the first theoretical guarantee for these two coupled ODL components: optimization and learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T03:35:13Z)
• Unified Convergence Analysis for Adaptive Optimization with Moving Average Estimator [75.05106948314956]
  We show that an increasing large momentum parameter for the first-order moment is sufficient for adaptive scaling. We also give insights for increasing the momentum in a stagewise manner in accordance with stagewise decreasing step size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-30T08:50:24Z)
• Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmark [94.29436694770953]
  Learning to optimize (L2O) is an emerging approach that leverages machine learning to develop optimization methods. This article is poised to be the first comprehensive survey and benchmark of L2O for continuous optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T20:46:20Z)
• Bilevel Optimization: Convergence Analysis and Enhanced Design [63.64636047748605]
  Bilevel optimization is a tool for many machine learning problems. We propose a novel stoc-efficientgradient estimator named stoc-BiO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T18:09:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.