ASRank: Zero-Shot Re-Ranking with Answer Scent for Document Retrieval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15245v1
• Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 15:27:40 GMT
• Title: ASRank: Zero-Shot Re-Ranking with Answer Scent for Document Retrieval
• Authors: Abdelrahman Abdallah, Jamshid Mozafari, Bhawna Piryani, Adam Jatowt,
• Abstract summary: ASRank is a new re-ranking method based on scoring retrieved documents using zero-shot answer scent.<n>It increases Top-1 retrieval accuracy on NQ from $19.2%$ to $46.5%$ for MSS and $22.1%$ to $47.3%$ for BM25.
• Score: 16.434748534272014
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models have drawn considerable attention in modern open-domain question answering. The effectiveness of RAG depends on the quality of the top retrieved documents. However, conventional retrieval methods sometimes fail to rank the most relevant documents at the top. In this paper, we introduce ASRank, a new re-ranking method based on scoring retrieved documents using zero-shot answer scent which relies on a pre-trained large language model to compute the likelihood of the document-derived answers aligning with the answer scent. Our approach demonstrates marked improvements across several datasets, including NQ, TriviaQA, WebQA, ArchivalQA, HotpotQA, and Entity Questions. Notably, ASRank increases Top-1 retrieval accuracy on NQ from $19.2\%$ to $46.5\%$ for MSS and $22.1\%$ to $47.3\%$ for BM25. It also shows strong retrieval performance on several datasets compared to state-of-the-art methods (47.3 Top-1 by ASRank vs 35.4 by UPR by BM25).

Related papers

• RAGentA: Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Attributed Question Answering [8.846547396283832]
  RAGentA is a multi-agent retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework for attributed question answering (QA)<n>Central to the framework is a hybrid retrieval strategy that combines sparse and dense methods, improving Recall@20 by 12.5%.<n>RAGentA outperforms standard RAG baselines, achieving gains of 1.09% in correctness and 10.72% in faithfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T13:37:03Z)
• InsertRank: LLMs can reason over BM25 scores to Improve Listwise Reranking [3.1125398490785217]
  InsertRank is an LLM-based reranker that leverages lexical signals like BM25 scores during reranking to further improve retrieval performance.<n>With Deepseek-R1, InsertRank achieves a score of 37.5 on the BRIGHT benchmark, and 51.1 on the R2MED benchmark, surpassing previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T01:04:45Z)
• Deep Retrieval at CheckThat! 2025: Identifying Scientific Papers from Implicit Social Media Mentions via Hybrid Retrieval and Re-Ranking [4.275139302875217]
  We present the methodology and results of the Deep Retrieval team for subtask 4b of the CLEF CheckThat! 2025 competition.<n>We propose a hybrid retrieval pipeline that combines lexical precision, semantic generalization, and deep contextual re-ranking.<n>Our approach achieves a mean reciprocal rank at 5 (MRR@5) of 76.46% on the development set and 66.43% on the hidden test set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T08:55:39Z)
• Rank-R1: Enhancing Reasoning in LLM-based Document Rerankers via Reinforcement Learning [76.50690734636477]
  We introduce Rank-R1, a novel LLM-based reranker that performs reasoning over both the user query and candidate documents before performing the ranking task. Our experiments on the TREC DL and BRIGHT datasets show that Rank-R1 is highly effective, especially for complex queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T03:14:26Z)
• From Retrieval to Generation: Comparing Different Approaches [15.31883349259767]
  We evaluate retrieval-based, generation-based, and hybrid models for knowledge-intensive tasks. We show that dense retrievers, particularly DPR, achieve strong performance in ODQA with a top-1 accuracy of 50.17% on NQ. We also analyze language modeling tasks using WikiText-103, showing that retrieval-based approaches like BM25 achieve lower perplexity compared to generative and hybrid methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T16:29:14Z)
• Retrieval-Augmented Visual Question Answering via Built-in Autoregressive Search Engines [17.803396998387665]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged to address the knowledge-intensive visual question answering (VQA) task. We propose ReAuSE, an alternative to the previous RAG model for the knowledge-based VQA task. Our model functions both as a generative retriever and an accurate answer generator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-23T16:39:39Z)
• ECLIPSE: Contrastive Dimension Importance Estimation with Pseudo-Irrelevance Feedback for Dense Retrieval [14.72046677914345]
  Recent advances in Information Retrieval have leveraged high-dimensional embedding spaces to improve the retrieval of relevant documents.<n>Despite these high-dimensional representations, documents relevant to a query reside on a lower-dimensional, query-dependent manifold.<n>We propose a novel methodology that addresses these limitations by leveraging information from both relevant and non-relevant documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T15:45:06Z)
• JudgeRank: Leveraging Large Language Models for Reasoning-Intensive Reranking [81.88787401178378]
  We introduce JudgeRank, a novel agentic reranker that emulates human cognitive processes when assessing document relevance. We evaluate JudgeRank on the reasoning-intensive BRIGHT benchmark, demonstrating substantial performance improvements over first-stage retrieval methods. In addition, JudgeRank performs on par with fine-tuned state-of-the-art rerankers on the popular BEIR benchmark, validating its zero-shot generalization capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T18:43:12Z)
• BRIGHT: A Realistic and Challenging Benchmark for Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval [54.54576644403115]
  Many complex real-world queries require in-depth reasoning to identify relevant documents. We introduce BRIGHT, the first text retrieval benchmark that requires intensive reasoning to retrieve relevant documents. Our dataset consists of 1,384 real-world queries spanning diverse domains, such as economics, psychology, mathematics, and coding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T17:58:27Z)
• Improving Passage Retrieval with Zero-Shot Question Generation [109.11542468380331]
  We propose a simple and effective re-ranking method for improving passage retrieval in open question answering. The re-ranker re-scores retrieved passages with a zero-shot question generation model, which uses a pre-trained language model to compute the probability of the input question conditioned on a retrieved passage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-15T14:51:41Z)
• Adversarial Retriever-Ranker for dense text retrieval [51.87158529880056]
  We present Adversarial Retriever-Ranker (AR2), which consists of a dual-encoder retriever plus a cross-encoder ranker. AR2 consistently and significantly outperforms existing dense retriever methods. This includes the improvements on Natural Questions R@5 to 77.9%(+2.1%), TriviaQA R@5 to 78.2%(+1.4), and MS-MARCO MRR@10 to 39.5%(+1.3%)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T16:41:15Z)
• Pre-training Tasks for Embedding-based Large-scale Retrieval [68.01167604281578]
  We consider the large-scale query-document retrieval problem. Given a query (e.g., a question), return the set of relevant documents from a large document corpus. We show that the key ingredient of learning a strong embedding-based Transformer model is the set of pre-training tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-10T16:44:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.