Towards Sharper Information-theoretic Generalization Bounds for Meta-Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15559v1
• Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 15:22:04 GMT
• Title: Towards Sharper Information-theoretic Generalization Bounds for Meta-Learning
• Authors: Wen Wen, Tieliang Gong, Yuxin Dong, Yong-Jin Liu, Weizhan Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We establish novel single-step information-theoretic bounds for meta-learning. Our bounds exhibit substantial advantages over prior MI- and CMI-based bounds. We provide novel theoretical insights into the generalization behavior of two classes of noise and iterative meta-learning algorithms.
• Score: 31.843499167305115
• License:
• Abstract: In recent years, information-theoretic generalization bounds have emerged as a promising approach for analyzing the generalization capabilities of meta-learning algorithms. However, existing results are confined to two-step bounds, failing to provide a sharper characterization of the meta-generalization gap that simultaneously accounts for environment-level and task-level dependencies. This paper addresses this fundamental limitation by establishing novel single-step information-theoretic bounds for meta-learning. Our bounds exhibit substantial advantages over prior MI- and CMI-based bounds, especially in terms of tightness, scaling behavior associated with sampled tasks and samples per task, and computational tractability. Furthermore, we provide novel theoretical insights into the generalization behavior of two classes of noise and iterative meta-learning algorithms via gradient covariance analysis, where the meta-learner uses either the entire meta-training data (e.g., Reptile), or separate training and test data within the task (e.g., model agnostic meta-learning (MAML)). Numerical results validate the effectiveness of the derived bounds in capturing the generalization dynamics of meta-learning.

Related papers

• Interpetable Target-Feature Aggregation for Multi-Task Learning based on Bias-Variance Analysis [53.38518232934096]
  Multi-task learning (MTL) is a powerful machine learning paradigm designed to leverage shared knowledge across tasks to improve generalization and performance. We propose an MTL approach at the intersection between task clustering and feature transformation based on a two-phase iterative aggregation of targets and features. In both phases, a key aspect is to preserve the interpretability of the reduced targets and features through the aggregation with the mean, which is motivated by applications to Earth science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T08:30:16Z)
• Theoretical Characterization of the Generalization Performance of Overfitted Meta-Learning [70.52689048213398]
  This paper studies the performance of overfitted meta-learning under a linear regression model with Gaussian features. We find new and interesting properties that do not exist in single-task linear regression. Our analysis suggests that benign overfitting is more significant and easier to observe when the noise and the diversity/fluctuation of the ground truth of each training task are large.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-09T20:36:13Z)
• Scalable PAC-Bayesian Meta-Learning via the PAC-Optimal Hyper-Posterior: From Theory to Practice [54.03076395748459]
  A central question in the meta-learning literature is how to regularize to ensure generalization to unseen tasks. We present a generalization bound for meta-learning, which was first derived by Rothfuss et al. We provide a theoretical analysis and empirical case study under which conditions and to what extent these guarantees for meta-learning improve upon PAC-Bayesian per-task learning bounds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-14T08:51:04Z)
• Provable Generalization of Overparameterized Meta-learning Trained with SGD [62.892930625034374]
  We study the generalization of a widely used meta-learning approach, Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) We provide both upper and lower bounds for the excess risk of MAML, which captures how SGD dynamics affect these generalization bounds. Our theoretical findings are further validated by experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-18T07:22:57Z)
• A General framework for PAC-Bayes Bounds for Meta-Learning [0.0]
  We study PAC-Bayes bounds on meta generalization gap. In this paper, by upper bounding arbitrary convex functions, we obtain new PAC-Bayes bounds. Using these bounds, we develop new PAC-Bayes meta-learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-11T07:45:25Z)
• Generalization Bounds For Meta-Learning: An Information-Theoretic Analysis [8.028776552383365]
  We propose a generic understanding of both the conventional learning-to-learn framework and the modern model-agnostic meta-learning algorithms. We provide a data-dependent generalization bound for a variant of MAML, which is non-vacuous for deep few-shot learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-29T17:45:54Z)
• Meta-Learning with Fewer Tasks through Task Interpolation [67.03769747726666]
  Current meta-learning algorithms require a large number of meta-training tasks, which may not be accessible in real-world scenarios. By meta-learning with task gradient (MLTI), our approach effectively generates additional tasks by randomly sampling a pair of tasks and interpolating the corresponding features and labels. Empirically, in our experiments on eight datasets from diverse domains, we find that the proposed general MLTI framework is compatible with representative meta-learning algorithms and consistently outperforms other state-of-the-art strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-04T20:15:34Z)
• Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Meta-Learning and Applications [42.275148861039895]
  Key performance measure for meta-learning is the meta-generalization gap. This paper presents novel information-theoretic upper bounds on the meta-generalization gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-09T05:48:01Z)
• Theoretical Convergence of Multi-Step Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning [63.64636047748605]
  We develop a new theoretical framework to provide convergence guarantee for the general multi-step MAML algorithm. In particular, our results suggest that an inner-stage step needs to be chosen inversely proportional to $N$ of inner-stage steps in order for $N$ MAML to have guaranteed convergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-18T19:17:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.