Challenges in Ensuring AI Safety in DeepSeek-R1 Models: The Shortcomings of Reinforcement Learning Strategies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17030v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 15:52:51 GMT
• Title: Challenges in Ensuring AI Safety in DeepSeek-R1 Models: The Shortcomings of Reinforcement Learning Strategies
• Authors: Manojkumar Parmar, Yuvaraj Govindarajulu,
• Abstract summary: This paper examines the limitations of Reinforcement Learning as the primary approach for reducing harmful outputs in DeepSeek-R1.<n>We propose hybrid training approaches combining RL and Supervised Fine-Tuning to achieve robust harmlessness reduction.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in reasoning, alignment, and task-specific performance. However, ensuring harmlessness in these systems remains a critical challenge, particularly in advanced models like DeepSeek-R1. This paper examines the limitations of Reinforcement Learning (RL) as the primary approach for reducing harmful outputs in DeepSeek-R1 and compares it with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT). While RL improves reasoning capabilities, it faces challenges such as reward hacking, generalization failures, language mixing, and high computational costs. We propose hybrid training approaches combining RL and SFT to achieve robust harmlessness reduction. Usage recommendations and future directions for deploying DeepSeek-R1 responsibly are also presented.

Related papers

• Scaling Up RL: Unlocking Diverse Reasoning in LLMs via Prolonged Training [121.5858973157225]
  We investigate the effects of prolonged reinforcement learning on a small language model across a diverse set of reasoning domains.<n>We introduce controlled KL regularization, clipping ratio, and periodic reference policy resets as critical components for unlocking long-term performance gains.<n>Our model achieves significant improvements over strong baselines, including +14.7% on math, +13.9% on coding, and +54.8% on logic puzzle tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T17:59:24Z)
• Excessive Reasoning Attack on Reasoning LLMs [26.52688123765127]
  In this work, we expose a novel threat: adversarial inputs can be crafted to exploit excessive reasoning behaviors.<n>Our results demonstrate a 3x to 9x increase in reasoning length with comparable utility performance.<n>Our crafted adversarial inputs exhibit transferability, inducing computational overhead in o3-mini, o1-mini, DeepSeek-R1, and QWQ models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T10:16:52Z)
• Reasoning Model Unlearning: Forgetting Traces, Not Just Answers, While Preserving Reasoning Skills [32.96074934023323]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) have enabled strong chain-of-thought (CoT) generation through test-time computation.<n>We show that conventional unlearning algorithms, originally designed for non-reasoning models, are inadequate for LRMs.<n>We propose Reasoning-aware Representation Misdirection for Unlearning ($R2MU$), a novel method that effectively suppresses sensitive reasoning traces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-15T20:54:23Z)
• Beyond Accuracy: Dissecting Mathematical Reasoning for LLMs Under Reinforcement Learning [82.43575191712726]
  We introduce a fine-grained analytic framework to dissect the impact ofReinforcement learning on reasoning.<n>Our framework specifically investigates key elements that have been hypothesized to benefit from RL training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T07:53:59Z)
• Reinforced Latent Reasoning for LLM-based Recommendation [83.18146814163308]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities in complex problem-solving tasks.<n>Existing methods typically rely on fine-tuning with explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) data.<n>In this work, we explore an alternative approach that shifts from explicit CoT reasoning to compact, information-dense latent reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T11:03:45Z)
• QwenLong-L1: Towards Long-Context Large Reasoning Models with Reinforcement Learning [80.26953590563232]
  We formalize the paradigm of long-context reasoning RL, and identify key challenges in suboptimal training efficiency and unstable optimization process.<n>We propose QwenLong-L1, a framework that adapts short-context LRMs to long-context scenarios via progressive context scaling.<n> Experiments on seven long-context document question-answering benchmarks demonstrate that QwenLong-L1-32B outperforms flagship LRMs like OpenAI-o3-mini and Qwen3-235B-A22B.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T09:31:55Z)
• SRPO: A Cross-Domain Implementation of Large-Scale Reinforcement Learning on LLM [18.275547804539016]
  Two-Staged history-Resampling Policy optimization surpasses the performance of DeepSeek-R1-Zero-32B on the AIME24 and LiveCodeBench benchmarks. We introduce two key methodological innovations: (1) a two-stage cross-domain training paradigm designed to balance the development of mathematical reasoning and coding proficiency, and (2) History Resampling (HR), a technique to address ineffective samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-19T13:06:03Z)
• RealSafe-R1: Safety-Aligned DeepSeek-R1 without Compromising Reasoning Capability [29.437113221903715]
  We introduce RealSafe-R1 as safety-aligned versions of DeepSeek-R1 models. Our method preserves the models' reasoning capabilities by maintaining the training data within the original distribution of generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T10:26:37Z)
• Reasoning Under 1 Billion: Memory-Augmented Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models [53.4530106173067]
  Large language models (LLMs) with reinforcement learning (RL) have shown promising improvements in complex reasoning tasks. RL remains challenging for tiny LLMs with 1 billion parameters or fewer because they lack the necessary pretraining strength to explore effectively. This work introduces a novel intrinsic motivation approach that leverages episodic memory to address this challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T04:46:17Z)
• OpenVLThinker: An Early Exploration to Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative Self-Improvement [91.88062410741833]
  This study investigates whether similar reasoning capabilities can be successfully integrated into large vision-language models (LVLMs) We consider an approach that iteratively leverages supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on lightweight training data and Reinforcement Learning (RL) to further improve model generalization. OpenVLThinker, a LVLM exhibiting consistently improved reasoning performance on challenging benchmarks such as MathVista, MathVerse, and MathVision, demonstrates the potential of our strategy for robust vision-language reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:52:43Z)
• Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs [46.352406501403465]
  Long chains-of-thought (CoTs) enable strategies like backtracking and error correction. Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a crucial method for developing these capabilities. We identify the key factors that enable models to generate long CoT trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T17:13:32Z)
• DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [147.16121855209246]
  We introduce our first-generation reasoning models, DeepSeek-R1-Zero and DeepSeek-R1.<n>DeepSeek-R1-Zero is trained via large-scale reinforcement learning.<n>DeepSeek-R1 incorporates multi-stage training and cold-start data before RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-22T15:19:35Z)
• Reinforcement Learning with Intrinsically Motivated Feedback Graph for Lost-sales Inventory Control [12.832009040635462]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has proven to be well-performed and general-purpose in the inventory control (IC) domain. Online experience is expensive to acquire in real-world applications. Online experience may not reflect the true demand due to the lost sales phenomenon typical in IC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T13:52:47Z)
• Analyzing Adversarial Inputs in Deep Reinforcement Learning [53.3760591018817]
  We present a comprehensive analysis of the characterization of adversarial inputs, through the lens of formal verification. We introduce a novel metric, the Adversarial Rate, to classify models based on their susceptibility to such perturbations. Our analysis empirically demonstrates how adversarial inputs can affect the safety of a given DRL system with respect to such perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T21:58:40Z)
• Stabilizing Contrastive RL: Techniques for Robotic Goal Reaching from Offline Data [101.43350024175157]
  Self-supervised learning has the potential to decrease the amount of human annotation and engineering effort required to learn control strategies. Our work builds on prior work showing that the reinforcement learning (RL) itself can be cast as a self-supervised problem. We demonstrate that a self-supervised RL algorithm based on contrastive learning can solve real-world, image-based robotic manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T01:36:56Z)
• Robust Reinforcement Learning Objectives for Sequential Recommender Systems [7.44049827436013]
  We develop recommender systems that incorporate direct user feedback in the form of rewards, enhancing personalization for users. employing RL algorithms presents challenges, including off-policy training, expansive action spaces, and the scarcity of datasets with sufficient reward signals. We introduce an enhanced methodology aimed at providing a more effective solution to these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T08:09:08Z)
• Hyperbolic Deep Reinforcement Learning [8.983647543608226]
  We propose a new class of deep reinforcement learning algorithms that model latent representations in hyperbolic space. We empirically validate our framework by applying it to popular on-policy and off-policy RL algorithms on the Procgen and Atari 100K benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T12:03:04Z)
• Supervised Advantage Actor-Critic for Recommender Systems [76.7066594130961]
  We propose negative sampling strategy for training the RL component and combine it with supervised sequential learning. Based on sampled (negative) actions (items), we can calculate the "advantage" of a positive action over the average case. We instantiate SNQN and SA2C with four state-of-the-art sequential recommendation models and conduct experiments on two real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-05T12:51:15Z)
• Combining Pessimism with Optimism for Robust and Efficient Model-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning [56.17667147101263]
  In real-world tasks, reinforcement learning agents encounter situations that are not present during training time. To ensure reliable performance, the RL agents need to exhibit robustness against worst-case situations. We propose the Robust Hallucinated Upper-Confidence RL (RH-UCRL) algorithm to provably solve this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T16:50:17Z)
• Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning through Adversarial Loss [74.20501663956604]
  Recent studies have shown that deep reinforcement learning agents are vulnerable to small adversarial perturbations on the agent's inputs. We propose RADIAL-RL, a principled framework to train reinforcement learning agents with improved robustness against adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-05T07:49:42Z)
• Stealing Deep Reinforcement Learning Models for Fun and Profit [33.64948529132546]
  This paper presents the first model extraction attack against Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) It enables an external adversary to precisely recover a black-box DRL model only from its interaction with the environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-09T03:24:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.